MX-D-02: The Sheinbaum Government — Continuity, Departure, and the Trump-2 Confrontation (2024–2025)

Status: DRAFTWords: 11,931

1. Key Takeaways

The Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo government, inaugurated on 1 October 2024 at the Cámara de Diputados in Mexico City, is the post-AMLO continuity-and-departure administration that operates the Cuarta Transformación 2.0 — Sheinbaum's segundo piso framing — under the largest electoral mandate in modern Mexican history (59.76 per cent of the popular vote on a 32.31-percentage-point margin) and the most consequential constitutional rewrite of the post-2000 period (the September 2024 judicial reform, in operational implementation across the first eight months of the sexenio). The early-period record demonstrates substantive continuity with AMLO across welfare-architecture, energy-sovereignty, and the austeridad republicana fiscal posture; substantive departure across cabinet professionalisation, mañanera tone, security-policy operational posture, and the climate-and-industrial-policy positioning that Sheinbaum's pre-political scientific career enables. The continuity-vs-departure axis is the principal interpretive question of the period.
The September 2024 judicial-reform constitutional amendment — signed into the Diario Oficial de la Federación on 15 September 2024 (Independence Day eve) by outgoing President AMLO, after the Chamber of Deputies vote of 4 September (359–135) and the Senate vote of 11 September (86–41, exactly at the two-thirds threshold) — was operationally completed under the Sheinbaum government through the post-October 2024 sequence of: secondary legislation; the INE-administered registration of candidates for the 1 June 2025 first-round judicial elections; the SCJN's own attempted constitutional challenge (a 5 November 2024 SCJN ruling, with the post-2024 court eight-justice-supporting-the-challenge versus three-opposing-it composition, that was procedurally set aside in subsequent action); the Tribunal de Disciplina Judicial constitutional institutionalisation; and the SCJN's reduction from 11 to 9 ministers with 12-year terms. The Sheinbaum government has consistently characterised the implementation as a constitutional fait accompli requiring administrative execution rather than political contestation.
The post-1 October 2024 cabinet architecture is the principal evidence of the technocratic-professionalisation departure from the AMLO cabinet pattern. The principal appointments: Marcelo Ebrard Casaubón as Secretary of Economy (the senior figure of the AMLO foreign-policy team, repositioned from the 2018–2023 SRE portfolio to manage the USMCA and the Trump-2 trade confrontation); Juan Ramón de la Fuente Ramírez as Secretary of Foreign Relations (former UNAM Rector 1999–2007, former Permanent Representative of Mexico to the United Nations 2019–2024, a figure of substantial international-institutional standing); Rosa Icela Rodríguez Velázquez as Secretary of the Interior (continuing from her AMLO-era Secretary of Public Security and Citizen Protection role); Omar García Harfuch as Secretary of Public Security and Citizen Protection (former Mexico City Police Chief, the operational security-professional figure of the cabinet, the target of a high-profile June 2020 CJNG assassination attempt that he survived); and Rogelio Ramírez de la O as Secretary of Finance and Public Credit (continuing from his July 2021 AMLO-era appointment, the orthodox-macroeconomic anchor of the sexenio). The cabinet profile — technocratic, internationally-credentialed, operationally-experienced — represents a substantive departure from the AMLO cabinet that emphasised political-loyalty-and-popular-base figures.
The 25 November 2024 Sheinbaum response to President-elect Trump's 25 November 2024 Truth Social announcement of his intention to impose, on his first day in office, a 25 per cent tariff on all Mexican imports under emergency authority, citing fentanyl and migration, established the framing of the bilateral relationship that has held through May 2025. Sheinbaum's same-day public letter to Trump argued that tariffs would not solve fentanyl or migration; that one-for-one retaliation would harm both economies; that the bilateral required cooperation rather than coercion; and that she reaffirmed Mexico's commitment to the bilateral framework. The letter — written in a measured, non-confrontational, but firm register — was widely characterised across Mexican political commentary (Castañeda, Dresser, Bravo Regidor) as the strongest opening positioning available to Mexico in the circumstances. It positioned Sheinbaum as the constitutionally-elected counterpart prepared to negotiate from a posture of dignity and non-intervention rather than from acquiescence or escalation.
The 1 February 2025 Executive Order 14195 imposed 25 per cent tariffs on most Mexican goods imported into the United States, invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and citing the cross-border fentanyl flow and irregular migration as the national-emergency justification. The order was the first IEEPA-based imposition of tariffs on a USMCA partner. The Mexican response — formal protest through the SRE; the 3 February 2025 telephone call between Sheinbaum and Trump that produced the 30-day pause; the announcement of the deployment of 10,000 National Guard troops to the northern border as part of the pause framework; and the absence of immediate retaliatory tariffs — established the negotiating template for the subsequent months. Banxico maintained policy-rate stability through the immediate-shock window. The peso depreciated by approximately 3 per cent against the dollar across late January – early February 2025 [TBD-VERIFY: precise depreciation range].
The 3 February 2025 30-day pause did not produce a stable resolution. The tariff regime was reinstated, partially modified, and selectively applied across February, March, and April 2025 in a sequence of executive orders and proclamations that included carve-outs for USMCA-compliant goods (announced 6 March 2025), sectoral tariffs (steel and aluminum 12 March 2025, automotive late March 2025, agricultural products on a rolling basis), and a 9 April 2025 partial-resolution framework that the Sheinbaum government characterised as the basis for the USMCA renegotiation track. The negotiation track — pursued through the Ebrard SE-Trump-USTR Greer channel and the de la Fuente SRE-State Department Rubio channel — operated alongside the still-active tariff regime through April 2025.
The May 2025 fentanyl-and-migration cooperation framework, announced jointly by Sheinbaum and Trump on [TBD-VERIFY: precise May 2025 date] after the [TBD-VERIFY: announcement format — Sheinbaum-Trump call / joint statement], established the post-tariff-shock operational template. Its principal elements: continued intensification of Mexican fentanyl-precursor-and-laboratory seizures (the post-October 2024 cumulative record substantially exceeded the 2018–2023 cumulative); enhanced sharing of cartel-figure intelligence (the framework drew on the February 2025 transfer of 29 cartel-aligned figures to US custody as the operational template); migration-flow management through the resumed Remain-in-Mexico framework adapted to the post-Title-42 conditions; and Mexican commitment to invest in northern-border infrastructure under the Plan México framework. The cooperation framework did not resolve the tariff regime fully but reduced the most-acute components and produced an operational working architecture.
The Plan México — Sheinbaum's industrial-policy framework announced on 13 January 2025, ahead of the Trump-2 inauguration — committed the sexenio to: increasing private and public investment to 28 per cent of GDP by 2030 (from approximately 22 per cent in 2024); 1.5 million new advanced-manufacturing jobs through 2030; nearshoring-and-import-substitution priorities; Mexican-content requirements consistent with USMCA framework; and infrastructure investment commitments. The Plan was framed by the Sheinbaum government as the strategic-economic response to the Trump-2 environment — a positioning of Mexico as a USMCA-compliant nearshoring destination that aligns with US strategic-economic interests rather than as a target of US economic coercion. The Plan's operational implementation through 2025 has been substantially constrained by the tariff regime's uncertainty.
The cartel-and-security trajectory through the early Sheinbaum sexenio has been characterised by the García Harfuch operational posture: substantial fentanyl-precursor seizures (the Operativo Frontera Norte sequence from late 2024 produced laboratory seizures across Sinaloa, Jalisco, and Sonora at a tempo exceeding the AMLO-era cumulative); the February 2025 joint US-Mexico operation that transferred 29 cartel-aligned figures (including Rafael Caro Quintero and the Z-40 Miguel Treviño Morales) to US custody; the post-2024 Sinaloa Cartel internal conflict between the Chapitos (the Guzmán Loera sons' faction) and the Mayos (the Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada faction, weakened after Zambada's July 2024 US apprehension) producing substantial intra-cartel violence in Sinaloa; and the broader operational reorientation away from the AMLO-era abrazos no balazos posture toward what the Sheinbaum government characterises as a "results-oriented" Estrategia Nacional de Seguridad. Civilian casualty trajectories through the early sexenio remain elevated [TBD-VERIFY: precise INEGI homicide-rate trajectory through Q1 2025].
Three contested-record accounts structure the assessment of the early Sheinbaum sexenio. First, the continuity-vs-departure account: whether the Cuarta Transformación 2.0 is a Sheinbaum-led institutionalisation of the post-2018 realignment that transcends AMLO's personal authority (the 4T view, supported by the cabinet professionalisation, the Plan México technocratic posture, and the Sheinbaum personal-political register) or whether it remains a continuation operated under AMLO's continued informal authority (a view advanced by Krauze, by some Reforma commentary, and by elements of the PAN-PRI-PRD post-2024 opposition framing). Second, the judicial-reform account: whether the September 2024 constitutional amendment delivers democratic deepening through popularly-elected judges (the 4T claim) or constitutional contraction through politicisation of the federal judiciary (the critical claim, with the 1 June 2025 first-round elections providing the principal early-test data). Third, the Trump-2 account: whether the Sheinbaum government's measured, formal, non-confrontational positioning has successfully managed the worst tariff shock to the bilateral since the 1970s (the government's view, supported by Banxico stability and the May 2025 cooperation framework) or whether the persistence of the tariff regime and the absence of a stable USMCA framework demonstrates the structural weakness of Mexico's negotiating position vis-à-vis the United States (a view advanced by critical-economic commentary). The three accounts remain unresolved as of mid-2026.
The comparative-Latin-American positioning of the early Sheinbaum sexenio is the secondary-but-consequential interpretive frame. Sheinbaum's Mexico is the most-electorally-mandated of the Latin American post-2018 left governments — substantially exceeding the Lula 2022 Brazilian mandate (50.9 per cent in the runoff), the Boric 2021 Chilean mandate, the Petro 2022 Colombian mandate, and the Castro 2021 Honduran mandate. The Sheinbaum government's positioning vis-à-vis the Trump-2 administration has been the closest-of-the-region in operational engagement (compared with the explicit-confrontational positioning of the Petro government in Colombia and the post-confrontational reconciliations of the Lula government in Brazil) while preserving the formal Estrada Doctrine of non-intervention. The Sheinbaum-AMLO continuity arrangement is structurally distinct from the Latin American left-government succession patterns of the 2000s (the Kirchner-Fernández, Lula-Dilma, Chávez-Maduro arrangements) in that the Sheinbaum government inherits a substantial, operational, and electorally-popular programme rather than a contested or declining one.

2. The Inheritance — Sheinbaum's Government as Post-AMLO Configuration

2.1 The 2 June 2024 Mandate and its Programmatic Content

The Sheinbaum government takes office on the largest popular-vote mandate in modern Mexican electoral history (59.76 per cent; 35,924,519 votes; a 32.31-point margin over Xóchitl Gálvez's 27.45 per cent and Jorge Álvarez Máynez's 10.32 per cent). The mandate is anchored at MX-D-01. The programmatic content the mandate carries — articulated through the Morena Plataforma Electoral 2024, through Sheinbaum's campaign discourse, and through AMLO's pre-handover mañaneras of May–September 2024 — has three principal commitments. First, the continuation of the Cuarta Transformación welfare-programme architecture: Pensión para Adultos Mayores (universalised to 65 and over from January 2024), Becas Benito Juárez (basic-education, upper-secondary, tertiary streams), Sembrando Vida, Jóvenes Construyendo el Futuro, the Pensión para Personas con Discapacidad. Second, the deepening of the energy-sovereignty programme through Pemex and CFE — a commitment that intersects with Sheinbaum's pre-political scientific expertise in energy engineering. Third, the full implementation of the Plan C constitutional-reform package that AMLO had presented on 5 February 2024 and that the post-September 2024 Congressional supermajority would now operationalise.

2.2 The AMLO-Sheinbaum Transition Dynamic

The 2 June 2024 – 30 September 2024 transition period is the longest such interregnum in the post-2000 Mexican political pattern (AMLO had a 16 July 2018 – 1 December 2018 transition; Peña Nieto had a 1 July 2012 – 1 December 2012 transition; the December-inauguration framework was replaced by an October-inauguration framework only from 2018 onward). The four-month Sheinbaum-AMLO transition operated under a tightly-coordinated framework. AMLO retained operational authority through 30 September 2024 — and used that authority to drive the September 2024 constitutional-amendment sequence through the new post-1 September Congressional supermajority before the Sheinbaum inauguration. Sheinbaum's pre-inauguration role was that of incoming-president-designate, conducting the cabinet-building process (announcements rolled out from late June through August 2024), the policy-framework finalisation, and the preparation of the Plan México industrial-policy framework that would be announced on 13 January 2025.

The political-question of the transition was whether AMLO would attempt to retain post-30-September influence. The pattern of late Mexican post-PRI transitions — Fox-Calderón, Calderón-Peña Nieto, Peña Nieto-AMLO — had established that outgoing presidents retreated substantially from public political life upon leaving office. AMLO had publicly committed in repeated mañaneras through 2023–2024 to a complete retirement from political life upon his 30 September 2024 departure, to a return to his Palenque, Chiapas ranch, and to the writing of his planned post-presidential book. The pattern of AMLO's actual post-30-September 2024 retreat — substantially honoured through May 2025, with rare public appearances and no apparent attempts to maintain operational influence over the Sheinbaum government — has been the operational answer to the political question. The Sheinbaum government has nonetheless operated within a continued symbolic-political framework in which AMLO's authority is invoked as historical foundation (the Plan México announcement, for example, explicitly positioned the framework as continuation of AMLO's Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2019–2024).

2.3 The Continuity-and-Departure Architecture

The Sheinbaum government's continuity-and-departure architecture operates across five principal axes. On welfare programmes, the architecture is continuity: the post-October 2024 budget cycle maintains funding levels for all flagship programmes; the constitutional Article 4 anchoring established by the AMLO-era 8 May 2020 reform locks in the architecture against future reduction. On energy sovereignty, the architecture is continuity-with-evolution: the Pemex and CFE prioritisation continues but Sheinbaum's energy-engineering background and her January 2025 energy-policy framework introduce renewable-energy commitments (a 45 per cent renewable-generation target by 2030 [TBD-VERIFY: precise headline figure]) that depart from the AMLO-era posture. On the austeridad republicana fiscal framework, the architecture is continuity: the Ramírez de la O Treasury continues from AMLO; the post-2024 budget cycle maintains the operational-austerity commitments. On security policy, the architecture is departure: the García Harfuch appointment and the Estrategia Nacional de Seguridad framework reorient the security posture away from abrazos no balazos. On communication style, the architecture is departure: the Sheinbaum-era mañaneras — continuing daily but operating in a different register — have shortened, become more focused, and have abandoned much of the AMLO-era confrontational engagement with critical media (notably with Reforma and Latinus). The five-axis architecture is the principal evidence-base for the continuity-vs-departure account.

3. The September 2024 Judicial Reform — Operational Completion under the Transition

3.1 The Constitutional-Amendment Sequence

The September 2024 judicial-reform constitutional amendment, formally titled the Decreto por el que se reforman, adicionan y derogan diversas disposiciones de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, en materia de Reforma del Poder Judicial, was the most consequential constitutional rewrite of the post-2000 period. Its principal provisions: popular election of all federal judges — the Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (SCJN), the federal Circuit Court magistrates, the federal District Court judges; reduction of the SCJN from 11 to 9 ministers, with all serving 12-year terms (replacing the prior 15-year terms); creation of the Tribunal de Disciplina Judicial as a constitutional disciplinary body for the judiciary; elimination of the Consejo de la Judicatura Federal (CJF) and reassignment of its functions to the Tribunal de Disciplina Judicial and to a new administrative body; elimination of the SCJN's Pleno in its prior form, with a two-chamber structure; transitory provisions establishing the first-round-judicial-elections framework for 1 June 2025 and a second-round for [TBD-VERIFY: 2027 date].

The vote sequence was structured to exploit the September 2024 inter-regnum: the new Congress was sworn in on 1 September 2024 with the Morena-PT-PVEM supermajority secured through the sobrerrepresentación allocations; AMLO retained presidential authority through 30 September 2024; the votes were conducted between 4 and 11 September 2024 to allow time for state-legislature ratification before the 30 September AMLO departure. The Chamber approved the amendment on 4 September 2024 by 359 to 135 (the two-thirds supermajority threshold of 334 was met by 25 votes). The Senate approved on 11 September 2024 by 86 to 41 — exactly the two-thirds threshold of 86, achieved through the defection of Senator Miguel Ángel Yunes Márquez (PAN, Veracruz) and through the parallel switch of Senator Daniel Barreda (MC) [TBD-VERIFY: precise Senate vote composition; one-vote-defection threshold dynamics]. State-legislature ratification — requiring an absolute majority of state legislatures (17 of 32) — was completed between 13 and 15 September 2024 with substantially greater than required ratification (approximately 24 state legislatures ratified) [TBD-VERIFY: precise final state ratification count]. The Decree was published in the Diario Oficial de la Federación on 15 September 2024 — Independence Day eve, the deliberately-symbolic timing.

3.2 The Constitutional Contestation

The constitutional contestation produced multiple challenges across the September 2024 – February 2025 window. The principal challenge: a 5 November 2024 SCJN ruling on a constitutional action presented by federal magistrates and judges, which the post-2024 SCJN majority (eight justices supporting the challenge, three opposing) characterised as a constitutional violation through breach of the unamendable elements of the Constitution. The ruling was procedurally contested by the Sheinbaum government through subsequent action and was set aside in the early-2025 sequence; the SCJN's authority to rule on the constitutional validity of constitutional amendments had been the subject of constitutional-doctrinal debate since at least the Felipe Calderón-era Caso Castañeda and earlier doctrine. The Sheinbaum government's position — articulated through the Senate, through President Sheinbaum's mañaneras, and through the November 2024 statement by Secretary of the Interior Rosa Icela Rodríguez — held that the constitutional amendment was a constitutionally-completed action and that no SCJN ruling could set aside an amendment to the Constitution itself.

External constitutional contestation came from: the Barra Mexicana — Colegio de Abogados and the Asociación Nacional de Magistrados de Circuito y Jueces de Distrito, which characterised the reform as inconsistent with the constitutional-judicial-independence framework; the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, which expressed concern in a November 2024 statement [TBD-VERIFY: precise date and document reference]; the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Independence of Judges and Lawyers, who issued a critical statement; and the Venice Commission of the Council of Europe, which characterised the reform as constitutionally heterodox by international comparative standards. The Sheinbaum government's response — that these were external observations on a sovereign constitutional decision — invoked the Estrada Doctrine of non-intervention as the framing principle.

3.3 The Implementation under Sheinbaum

The operational implementation under the Sheinbaum government operated across three principal tracks. First, secondary legislation: the Sheinbaum government drove the Congressional approval of the Ley General del Sistema de Medios de Impugnación en Materia Electoral amendments, the new Ley Orgánica del Poder Judicial de la Federación, and the reglamentary law of the Tribunal de Disciplina Judicial, across the October 2024 – February 2025 period. Second, candidate selection and registration: the INE-administered process for the 1 June 2025 judicial elections operated under a framework in which candidate nominations were drawn from three principal sources — the Executive (10 candidates per SCJN seat), the Legislature (10 candidates per SCJN seat), and the Judicial branch (10 candidates per SCJN seat) — with the post-shortlisting reduction to the 30-candidate-per-seat ballot. The registration period ran October 2024 – February 2025; the campaign period ran March – May 2025; the election was conducted on 1 June 2025 (post-coverage of this anchor document). Third, transitional institutional arrangements: the SCJN of 11 justices continued in operation through to the post-1 June 2025 transition; the CJF continued in operation pending the operational replacement by the Tribunal de Disciplina Judicial; the SCJN docket management proceeded under the 11-justice composition through May 2025. The fuller operational record of the judicial reform is anchored at MX-D-04.

4. The 1 October 2024 Inauguration and the Cabinet Architecture

4.1 The Inaugural Address and the Segundo Piso Framing

The 1 October 2024 inauguration at the Cámara de Diputados — the constitutional inauguration site since the 1917 Constitution, with the symbolic added weight of being the chamber where the September 2024 judicial-reform vote had been conducted three weeks earlier — was the first inauguration of a woman President of the Republic in Mexican history. Sheinbaum, who took the constitutional oath of office from the Chamber's president, delivered an inaugural address of approximately 60 minutes that committed her sexenio to a series of programmatic frames. The principal frame: continuation of the Cuarta Transformación under what she termed the "second floor" (segundo piso) of the 4T — a phrase Sheinbaum had used in her campaign and which she now formalised as her governing framework. The segundo piso metaphor positioned the AMLO sexenio as the foundational construction (the first floor) and the Sheinbaum sexenio as the upward-build (the second floor) of the same political-architectural project.

The address's commitments: continuation of the welfare-programme architecture (Becas Benito Juárez, Adultos Mayores, Sembrando Vida); deepening of the energy-sovereignty programme through Pemex and CFE; full implementation of the September 2024 judicial reform; expansion of the Pensión para el Bienestar and the introduction of a Beca Rita Cetina for basic-education students [TBD-VERIFY: precise programme name and design]; new commitments on women's rights (a Sheinbaum-specific innovation, given the historic significance of the first-woman-president framing); housing-construction commitments; and a Mexico-first industrial-policy framework that would be formalised as Plan México. The address's tone was different from AMLO's December 2018 inaugural — more technocratic, less polemical, with explicit acknowledgements of constitutional-institutional principles. The address closed with a rendering of the Frase Histórica — "¡Continuaremos haciendo historia, juntas y juntos!" — that became the early-sexenio slogan.

4.2 The Cabinet Architecture

The Sheinbaum cabinet, announced across June–August 2024 and confirmed at the 1 October 2024 inauguration, comprised 19 cabinet-rank positions plus eight cabinet-equivalent posts. The principal appointments and their significance follow:

Secretary of Economy (Secretaría de Economía): Marcelo Ebrard Casaubón. Ebrard, born 1959, former Jefe de Gobierno of Mexico City 2006–2012, AMLO's Secretary of Foreign Relations 2018–2023, the rival pre-candidate to Sheinbaum in the September 2023 Morena selection, was repositioned to the Economy portfolio to handle the USMCA renegotiation and the Trump-2 trade confrontation. The appointment was politically significant on multiple counts: it kept Ebrard inside the Morena tent after the 2023 selection contestation; it positioned the most-experienced foreign-affairs operator on the bilateral-trade brief; and it signalled that the Sheinbaum government would treat the post-2024 USMCA review as the highest economic-policy priority.

Secretary of Foreign Relations (Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores): Juan Ramón de la Fuente Ramírez. De la Fuente, born 1951, psychiatrist, former Secretary of Health under Zedillo 1994–1999, former Rector of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) 1999–2007, Mexico's Permanent Representative to the United Nations 2019–2024 under AMLO. The appointment of de la Fuente — a figure of substantial international-institutional credibility, technocratic-academic background, and substantial multilateral experience — represented a departure from the AMLO-Ebrard SRE pattern. De la Fuente's profile is institutionalist, formal, and oriented toward multilateral diplomacy; the appointment positioned Mexican foreign policy on a posture of formal-institutional engagement appropriate to the post-Trump-2 bilateral confrontation.

Secretary of the Interior (Secretaría de Gobernación): Rosa Icela Rodríguez Velázquez. Rodríguez, born 1956, former AMLO-era Secretary of Public Security and Citizen Protection (2020–2024), former CDMX official under AMLO and Ebrard, was repositioned from security to the Interior portfolio that manages domestic political coordination, Congress-executive relations, electoral matters, and migration. The appointment kept a senior AMLO-era operator at the Interior table.

Secretary of Public Security and Citizen Protection (Secretaría de Seguridad y Protección Ciudadana): Omar García Harfuch. García Harfuch, born 1982, grandson of the General Marcelino García Barragán who had been Defence Secretary during the 1968 Tlatelolco massacre, former Federal Police head under Peña Nieto, former Secretary of Public Security of Mexico City under Sheinbaum's CDMX administration (2019–2023), survivor of a 26 June 2020 CJNG-organised assassination attempt in Mexico City that killed two bodyguards and a bystander. The García Harfuch appointment was the cabinet's strongest signal of operational-security departure from the AMLO posture: García Harfuch is the security-professional figure of the cabinet, with a track record of direct cartel-confrontation rather than the AMLO-era abrazos no balazos posture. The appointment was met with broad approval from cross-political-spectrum security commentary.

Secretary of Finance and Public Credit (Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público): Rogelio Ramírez de la O. Ramírez de la O, born 1948, doctoral economist (Cambridge), founder of Ecanal economic-consultancy, AMLO-era Secretary of Finance from July 2021 onward (replacing Arturo Herrera) and a figure of orthodox-macroeconomic credibility, continued in his portfolio. The continuation signalled fiscal-policy continuity and reassured markets through the Banxico-Treasury coordination framework.

4.3 Other Principal Cabinet Members

The additional principal appointments: Alicia Bárcena (Environment and Natural Resources), continuing from her AMLO-era 2023–2024 SRE tenure, with substantial multilateral environmental-policy experience as former ECLAC Executive Secretary; Mario Delgado Carrillo (Public Education), former Morena national president; David Kershenobich (Health), a senior gastroenterologist and the National Institutes of Health director; Luz Elena González Escobar (Energy), continuing the energy-sovereignty framework with technocratic background; Edna Vega Rangel (Urban and Territorial Development); Julio Berdegué (Agriculture and Rural Development); Raquel Buenrostro (Public Function); Ariadna Montiel Reyes (Welfare), continuing the welfare-programme architecture from the AMLO sexenio; Jesús Esteva Medina (Communications and Transport); Lázaro Cárdenas Batel (Chief of Staff / Coordinador de Asesores), grandson of President Lázaro Cárdenas and former Michoacán governor [TBD-VERIFY: precise role designation]. The General Secretariat of the National Defense was occupied by Ricardo Trevilla Trejo (Army) and the Navy Ministry by Raymundo Pedro Morales Ángeles (Navy), continuing the post-2018 SEDENA-SEMAR senior-military framework.

The cabinet composition signalled three characteristics. First, professionalisation: a higher proportion of doctoral-credentialed, academically-trained, or institutionally-experienced appointees than in the AMLO cabinet. Second, continuity of political loyalty: substantial continuation of AMLO-era figures (Ebrard, Rodríguez, Ramírez de la O, Montiel) maintained the Morena political coalition's internal coherence. Third, operational specialisation: the García Harfuch security appointment and the de la Fuente SRE appointment positioned operational specialists at the two portfolios where the Sheinbaum government anticipated the highest external-and-internal contestation. The cabinet architecture is the principal evidence of the technocratic-departure element of the continuity-and-departure account.

5. The Operational Programme — Plan México, Welfare Continuity, and Energy

5.1 Plan México — The 13 January 2025 Industrial-Policy Framework

Plan México — the industrial-policy and investment framework formally presented at the Palacio Nacional on 13 January 2025 — is the operational economic-policy framework of the early Sheinbaum sexenio. The Plan was launched seven days before the 20 January 2025 Trump-2 inauguration, in a deliberately-timed pre-positioning that framed Mexico's economic agenda as a sovereign-strategic priority rather than as a reactive response to US trade policy. The Plan's headline targets: increasing the gross fixed-investment-to-GDP ratio to 28 per cent by 2030 (from approximately 22 per cent in 2024 according to INEGI data); generating 1.5 million new jobs in advanced manufacturing through 2030; positioning Mexico among the top-ten global economies by 2030; reducing the import-content share of Mexican-consumed goods; supporting strategic-sectoral domestic-content development across automotive, semiconductors, textiles, pharmaceuticals, and electromobility; and committing major infrastructure investment commitments through 2030.

The Plan's institutional architecture: a Consejo Asesor de Desarrollo Económico Regional y Relocalización (CADERR) [TBD-VERIFY: precise name and composition] that brings together federal, state, and private-sector representatives; a sector-specific working-group framework; and an investment-promotion programme operating through the SE under Ebrard. The Plan's three principal mechanisms: tax incentives for relocalisation investment (the Decreto de Estímulos Fiscales para la Industria Exportadora extension and expansion); infrastructure investment in industrial corridors (notably along the northern border, in the Bajío industrial heartland, and in the Sheinbaum-prioritised southern Corredor Interoceánico); and skills-and-training investment in technical-education programmes oriented toward the targeted sectors. The Plan operates in explicit complementarity with the USMCA framework — Mexican-content provisions of Plan México are designed to satisfy USMCA rules-of-origin requirements and to position Mexico as the USMCA's strategic-economic partner.

5.2 Welfare Programme Continuity

The welfare-programme architecture continues from the AMLO sexenio without major design changes. The 2025 federal budget (the Paquete Económico 2025, presented to Congress by Treasury Secretary Ramírez de la O on 15 November 2024) maintained funding levels for: the Pensión para Adultos Mayores (approximately 12.3 million beneficiaries by Q1 2025, at a bimonthly transfer of 6,200 pesos following the late-2024 adjustment) [TBD-VERIFY: precise 2025 figure]; the Becas Benito Juárez (approximately 11 million students cumulative across basic, upper-secondary, and tertiary streams); Sembrando Vida; Jóvenes Construyendo el Futuro; the Pensión para Personas con Discapacidad. Sheinbaum-specific welfare innovations announced in the inaugural address and rolled out in early 2025: the Beca Rita Cetina basic-education programme [TBD-VERIFY: precise design and rollout]; an expansion of the Pensión Mujeres Bienestar programme for women aged 60–64 (announced January 2025; first payments in early 2025) [TBD-VERIFY: precise design and rollout]; commitments on the Programa Salud Casa por Casa household-health-visit programme. The welfare-programme architecture is the continuity-element-most-stable across the early Sheinbaum sexenio.

5.3 The Energy Programme and the Climate-Continuity Departure

The energy programme operates under the framework Sheinbaum termed Soberanía Energética con Transición Justa (Energy Sovereignty with Just Transition). The framework continues the AMLO-era Pemex and CFE prioritisation while introducing renewable-energy commitments that the AMLO programme had subordinated. The principal commitments announced through early 2025: maintain Pemex production targets (1.8 million barrels per day; the actual 2024 production trajectory had been substantially lower at approximately 1.5 million bpd) [TBD-VERIFY: precise Q1 2025 production]; complete the Dos Bocas (Olmeca) refinery's full operational ramp-up; expand CFE generation capacity through the Programa para el Desarrollo del Sistema Eléctrico Nacional (PRODESEN) 2024–2038; deliver a 45 per cent renewable-generation target by 2030 [TBD-VERIFY: precise headline figure]; expand solar and wind generation with explicit private-sector participation under the framework of the post-2024 Reforma Energética Constitucional secondary legislation. The energy-policy direction is the most-Sheinbaum-specific departure within the broad continuity framework — and it is directly enabled by Sheinbaum's pre-political scientific background. The 45 per cent renewable-generation target represents a recommitment to the climate-policy commitments Mexico had reduced under AMLO.

5.4 Fiscal Posture and Banxico Coordination

The fiscal posture continues the austeridad republicana framework under Treasury Secretary Ramírez de la O. The Paquete Económico 2025 projected a 2025 Public Sector Borrowing Requirement (PSBR) of 3.9 per cent of GDP — a substantial reduction from the 5.9 per cent of GDP estimated for 2024 (the final AMLO-sexenio fiscal year, which had widened substantially as the mega-project completion costs and the welfare-programme expansion accumulated) [TBD-VERIFY: precise 2024 closing PSBR figure pending SHCP Cuenta Pública 2024]. The 2025 budget projected a federal-government-debt-to-GDP ratio of approximately 51 per cent and a primary-balance surplus of approximately 0.6 per cent of GDP. The fiscal consolidation commitment was the Sheinbaum government's signal to financial markets — particularly to the bondholder community and to the Banxico — of orthodox-macroeconomic continuity.

Banxico, under Governor Victoria Rodríguez Ceja (appointed by AMLO in December 2021, confirmed by the Senate in early 2022), maintained policy-rate stability through the early Sheinbaum sexenio. The pre-November-2024 Banxico policy rate of 10.25 per cent was reduced through a measured-pace easing cycle through Q4 2024 and Q1 2025: cuts of 25 basis points in November 2024, December 2024, February 2025, and March 2025 brought the rate to approximately 9.25 per cent by Q1 2025 [TBD-VERIFY: precise policy-rate trajectory]. Banxico's communication held that the easing cycle would continue measured-pace, contingent on inflation convergence to the 3 per cent target. The peso-dollar exchange rate operated in a 19.5–21.0 corridor across Q4 2024 and early Q1 2025, widening to approximately 20.5 in the post-1-February-2025 tariff window before stabilising back toward 20.0 by April 2025 [TBD-VERIFY: precise FX trajectory].

6. The November 2024 Trump-Tariff Threat and the Sheinbaum Response

On 25 November 2024 — 56 days after the Sheinbaum inauguration, and 56 days before the Trump-2 inauguration — US President-elect Donald J. Trump posted on Truth Social his intention to impose, on his first day in office (20 January 2025), a 25 per cent tariff on all imports from Mexico and Canada, and an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from China. The announcement cited the cross-border flow of fentanyl, the irregular migration of Mexican and Central American citizens into the United States, and the broader Trump-economic-nationalism programme. The announcement was made through Trump's personal Truth Social account rather than through formal pre-inauguration channels; it was the first major economic-policy declaration of the post-November-2024 transition period; and it produced an immediate market reaction (the Mexican peso weakened by approximately 1.5 per cent against the dollar on 26 November) and an immediate political reaction across Mexican commentary.

The announcement's framing — Mexico and Canada paired with China as targets of the post-inauguration tariff regime — was the political-rhetorical innovation. The IEEPA framework that Trump's announcement implicitly invoked was an emergency-authority instrument that no US administration had previously used against USMCA partners; the framework operates under the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act and permits the President to declare national-emergency-based economic actions, including tariffs, without Congressional authorisation. The Mexican legal-commentary response — articulated by Castañeda, by El Universal's editorial board, by Reforma commentary, and by international trade-law experts — held that the application of IEEPA to a USMCA partner constituted a breach of the trade-framework architecture and would likely be subject to legal challenge in US federal courts.

6.2 The Sheinbaum 25 November 2024 Response

Sheinbaum's same-day response — a public letter to Trump, published in Spanish and English, delivered through the mañanera of 26 November 2024 — was the operational positioning that has held through May 2025. The letter's principal arguments: tariffs would not solve fentanyl or migration; the cross-border drug-trafficking and migration challenges required cooperation rather than coercion; one-for-one retaliation would harm both economies — "a un arancel se respondería con otro arancel" — and Mexico was prepared to retaliate if the tariffs were imposed but preferred cooperation; the bilateral required a framework of mutual respect; and Mexico's commitment to the bilateral framework was unwavering.

The letter's tone — measured, formal, non-confrontational, but firm — was characterised across Mexican political commentary as the strongest opening positioning available. Castañeda's El País column of late November 2024 characterised the letter as the strongest formal Mexican diplomatic posture toward Washington since the post-1985 Cantarell-crisis-era de la Madrid letters to Reagan. Dresser's Reforma column characterised the letter as the necessary first step but warned that the test would be the post-20-January operational period. Bravo Regidor's Aristegui Noticias commentary characterised the letter as the Estrada Doctrine operationalised through the post-2025 conditions — non-intervention, dignity, mutual respect, but with the explicit retaliation-if-necessary signal.

6.3 The November–December 2024 Bilateral Preparation

The November 2024 – January 2025 inter-regnum produced an intensive Mexican government preparation for the post-inauguration confrontation. The principal preparation tracks: Economy Secretary Ebrard's coordination with the Mexican private sector — the Consejo Coordinador Empresarial (CCE), the Confederación de Cámaras Industriales (CONCAMIN), and the bilateral American Chamber of Commerce / Mexico (AmCham Mexico) — to align the Mexican-private-sector positioning with the government's; SRE de la Fuente's diplomatic preparation through the consular-network briefing and through engagement with the incoming Trump-2 transition team; the SCT-and-SEDENA northern-border infrastructure assessment; and the Plan México finalisation that would be announced 13 January 2025 as the strategic-economic counter-positioning. The 27 November 2024 Sheinbaum-Trump telephone call — the first direct contact between the two leaders — was characterised by both sides as constructive without producing operational commitments.

The Sheinbaum government's positioning during this period emphasised three principal points. First, Mexico's substantial post-2018 cooperation on migration, including the Remain-in-Mexico framework operational continuation, the post-Title-42 management, and the deployment of National Guard troops to the southern border, which had produced substantial reductions in irregular crossings through 2024. Second, Mexico's substantial fentanyl-precursor and laboratory seizures, particularly the post-October 2024 Operativo Frontera Norte sequence, which had produced laboratory dismantlements at a tempo exceeding the AMLO-era cumulative. Third, the bilateral USMCA framework's mutual benefit through trade-investment-and-supply-chain integration. The positioning sought to construct the negotiation framework on the basis of demonstrated cooperation rather than on the basis of US-coercion.

7. The 20 January 2025 Trump-2 Inauguration and the 1 February 2025 Tariff Imposition

7.1 The 20 January 2025 Inauguration and the Initial Executive Orders

Donald J. Trump was inaugurated as 47th President of the United States on 20 January 2025. The inauguration day produced an immediate executive-order sequence that included declarations of national emergency at the southern border, the immediate-implementation of the Remain in Mexico / Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP) framework, the immediate cancellation of the CBP One application-based asylum processing, and a series of immigration-enforcement executive orders. The trade-tariff executive order that Trump had announced on 25 November was not signed on inauguration day; instead, Trump signed an America First Trade Policy Memorandum on 20 January directing federal agencies to investigate trade policy and to prepare specific actions. The Mexican government — through Sheinbaum's 21 January mañanera — characterised the inaugural-day actions as the anticipated immigration-and-trade framework that the bilateral preparation had anticipated.

The 28 January 2025 Sheinbaum-Trump telephone call was characterised by both sides as productive; Sheinbaum's account in the 28 January mañanera held that Trump had not committed to the 1 February tariff date but had indicated that some action was likely. The Mexican government's operational posture across 20 January – 1 February was that tariffs were probable but that the operational framework would emerge through the negotiation.

7.2 The 1 February 2025 Executive Order 14195

On 1 February 2025 (a Saturday), Trump signed Executive Order 14195, formally titled Imposing Duties to Address the Situation at Our Southern Border. The order invoked the IEEPA framework, declared a national emergency citing the cross-border fentanyl and migration flows, and imposed a 25 per cent tariff on substantially all Mexican goods imported into the United States, effective 4 February 2025. The order's scope: approximately 80 per cent of total US imports from Mexico, with selective carve-outs for energy products and certain critical-minerals products. The 25 per cent rate was substantially the highest non-emergency tariff rate the United States had imposed on a USMCA partner since the 1994 entry into force of NAFTA.

The order was the first IEEPA-based imposition of tariffs on a USMCA partner. It was met with: an immediate Mexican formal protest through the SRE; a 1 February evening Sheinbaum statement; the announcement that Mexico would impose reciprocal tariffs (the specific scope to be announced); and an immediate market reaction (the peso weakened to approximately 21.0 to the dollar on 3 February, the IPC equity index fell approximately 2 per cent, and Mexican sovereign-bond yields widened by approximately 30 basis points across the curve [TBD-VERIFY: precise market reaction]). Banxico Governor Victoria Rodríguez Ceja's evening statement reaffirmed Banxico's policy framework and committed to maintaining monetary stability through the shock.

7.3 The 3 February 2025 Sheinbaum-Trump Call and the 30-Day Pause

The 3 February 2025 telephone call between Sheinbaum and Trump produced the 30-day pause on the tariff regime. The pause framework, announced jointly through Sheinbaum's 3 February evening statement and through Trump's Truth Social post, comprised: a 30-day suspension of the 25 per cent tariffs (effective 4 February through 4 March); Mexico's commitment to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops to the northern border to support migration and drug-trafficking enforcement; intensified bilateral cooperation on fentanyl-precursor interdiction; and a framework for the negotiation track to address the underlying issues. The pause was characterised by the Sheinbaum government as a successful initial-stage negotiation outcome and by the critical commentary as a substantial concession of Mexican sovereignty (the 10,000-troop commitment was characterised by Dresser and others as effectively committing Mexican military force to US-directed border enforcement).

The 3 February 2025 outcome established the operational template that would persist through April 2025: tariff imposition followed by partial-pause-or-modification through a Sheinbaum-Trump direct-channel negotiation, with operational concessions by Mexico on border enforcement and fentanyl-interdiction cooperation. The template's strategic-political significance: it positioned the bilateral on a fundamentally Trump-driven framework in which US tariff threats produced Mexican operational concessions, rather than on the USMCA-institutional framework that the trade architecture had presumed since 2020.

8. The 3 February 2025 Thirty-Day Pause and the March–April 2025 USMCA Renegotiation Track

8.1 The March 2025 Tariff Reinstatement and the USMCA Carve-Out

The 30-day pause expired on 4 March 2025. The 4 March 2025 executive-order action reinstated the IEEPA tariffs on Mexican goods at the 25 per cent rate, with an additional 10 per cent tariff on Chinese imports. The Sheinbaum response — through the 4 March mañanera and through SRE de la Fuente's same-day statement — characterised the reinstatement as a breach of the 3 February framework and announced that Mexico would impose reciprocal tariffs the following Sunday (9 March), with the specific scope to be announced. The peso weakened to approximately 21.0 against the dollar on 4 March.

The 6 March 2025 executive-order modification — produced after a Sheinbaum-Trump call on 5 March — introduced the USMCA-compliant-goods carve-out: goods that qualified under USMCA rules-of-origin (approximately 50 per cent of total US imports from Mexico) would be exempt from the IEEPA tariffs through 2 April 2025. The carve-out was characterised by the Sheinbaum government as a recognition by the United States that the USMCA framework retained operational force; by critical-commentary as an inadequate concession that left half of Mexican exports subject to the tariff regime. The 9 March reciprocal Mexican tariff was not imposed; the Sheinbaum government characterised the postponement as a negotiating gesture.

8.2 The March 2025 Sectoral Tariff Sequence

The March 2025 sequence produced additional sectoral tariff actions. On 12 March 2025, the Trump administration imposed 25 per cent tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from all countries (the Section-232 framework, reinstated and expanded from the 2018-era Trump-1 tariffs), affecting Mexican steel and aluminum exports. On 26 March 2025, the Trump administration announced 25 per cent tariffs on automotive imports under the Section-232 framework, scheduled to take effect 3 April 2025. The automotive tariff was the highest-impact sectoral action for Mexico, given that the Mexican automotive-export complex represents approximately 20 per cent of Mexican goods exports to the United States and that the integrated US-Mexico-Canada automotive supply chain was the principal industrial-economic content of the USMCA framework.

The Sheinbaum government's response across the March 2025 sectoral sequence operated through three channels. First, direct Sheinbaum-Trump engagement through multiple telephone calls and through public diplomacy. Second, Economy Secretary Ebrard's negotiation track with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer (confirmed 27 February 2025), oriented toward sector-specific exemptions and carve-outs. Third, SRE de la Fuente's diplomatic track with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, oriented toward the broader bilateral framework. The three-channel response produced incremental modifications across late March 2025 without a comprehensive resolution.

8.3 The 2 April 2025 "Liberation Day" Sequence and the 9 April 2025 Pause

On 2 April 2025, Trump announced what he termed "Liberation Day" — a comprehensive tariff regime on substantially all US imports. The Liberation Day framework imposed a 10 per cent universal baseline tariff and country-specific reciprocal tariffs on approximately 60 countries. The Liberation Day tariffs as initially announced exempted USMCA partners (Mexico and Canada were not on the country-specific reciprocal list); however, the underlying IEEPA-fentanyl tariffs against Mexican non-USMCA-compliant goods remained in effect. The Liberation Day market reaction was severe — the S&P 500 fell approximately 12 per cent across 2–8 April; sovereign-bond yields globally repriced; the Mexican peso weakened to approximately 20.5 against the dollar (less severe than the broader emerging-market reaction).

The 9 April 2025 executive-order pause — Trump's announced 90-day suspension of the country-specific reciprocal tariffs (excluding China) — produced a substantial market relief and reframed the bilateral. The 9 April action was followed by additional bilateral exchanges between Sheinbaum and Trump that the Sheinbaum government characterised as the basis for a USMCA-renegotiation track. The 90-day suspension framework provided a window through 8 July 2025 for negotiation of a comprehensive bilateral framework that would address the fentanyl-and-migration concerns within a USMCA-consistent framework.

8.4 The April 2025 USMCA Track

The April 2025 USMCA-renegotiation track operated under the broader framework of the 1 July 2026 USMCA review that the 2020 USMCA Article 34.7 sunset-review provision required. The article-34.7 sunset clause provides that the agreement terminates after 16 years unless the three parties confirm continuation at six-year intervals; the first joint review is scheduled for 1 July 2026. The April 2025 track aligned the bilateral tariff-confrontation negotiations with the USMCA-review preparation, producing a framework in which the Trump administration's tariff actions were re-characterised by the Sheinbaum government as bargaining-positions ahead of the 1 July 2026 review rather than as fundamental breaches of the trade architecture. The Ebrard-Greer working-group framework established weekly working sessions through April 2025; the de la Fuente-Rubio framework established quarterly bilateral consultations; and the Comisión Bilateral México-Estados Unidos framework was reactivated for senior-level dialogue.

The principal issues across the April 2025 USMCA track: rules-of-origin tightening for the automotive sector (the Mexican concession point in exchange for tariff relief); Mexican-content increases for steel and aluminum (the reciprocal concession point); fentanyl-precursor enforcement intensification through enhanced US-Mexico operational cooperation; migration management through the resumed MPP framework adapted to post-Title-42 conditions; and Chinese-investment restrictions in Mexico (a US negotiating priority, given concern about Chinese-firm relocation to Mexico to access the USMCA framework). The Sheinbaum government's positioning on the Chinese-investment restrictions was the principal concession area, with Ebrard's late-April 2025 announcements of new Mexican-investment-screening requirements characterised as alignment with the US strategic-economic framework.

9. The May 2025 Fentanyl-and-Migration Cooperation Framework

9.1 The Framework Components

The May 2025 fentanyl-and-migration cooperation framework — announced in [TBD-VERIFY: precise May 2025 date, between approximately 1 May and 12 May 2025] through a Sheinbaum-Trump joint statement following a [TBD-VERIFY: in-person meeting / videoconference / extended telephone call] — established the operational template for the post-tariff-shock bilateral. The framework's principal components: (i) Mexican commitment to continued intensification of fentanyl-precursor-and-laboratory enforcement under the Operativo Frontera Norte framework, with monthly bilateral operational-reporting through the Comisión Bilateral México-Estados Unidos; (ii) enhanced sharing of cartel-figure intelligence and the institutionalisation of the February 2025 transfer template for high-priority cartel figures requested by US prosecutors; (iii) migration-flow management through the operational MPP framework, with Mexican commitment to maintain reception capacity for returned asylum seekers and to coordinate with the US Department of Homeland Security on flow-management; (iv) Mexican commitment to invest in northern-border infrastructure (drug-detection technology, port-of-entry upgrades, National Guard deployment continuation) under the Plan México framework; (v) US commitment to a 90-day extension of the USMCA-compliant carve-out and to USMCA-track negotiations ahead of the 1 July 2026 review.

The framework did not fully resolve the tariff regime. The IEEPA tariffs on non-USMCA-compliant Mexican goods remained partially in effect through May 2025, at variable rates depending on sector. The Section-232 steel and aluminum tariffs remained in effect at the 25 per cent rate. The automotive tariffs had been substantially modified through the April carve-outs but were not eliminated. The framework instead reduced the most acute components — the across-the-board IEEPA tariff on substantially all Mexican goods — and produced an operational working architecture in which sector-specific issues would be addressed through ongoing negotiation rather than through across-the-board tariff actions.

9.2 The Mexican Operational Concessions

The framework's Mexican operational concessions comprised the principal commitments. First, the fentanyl-precursor enforcement intensification: Mexican commitment to additional laboratory-dismantlement operations across Sinaloa, Jalisco, Sonora, and the Pacific corridor, with US DEA operational cooperation under a strengthened framework. The post-October 2024 cumulative fentanyl-laboratory seizures had already substantially exceeded the AMLO-era cumulative; the May 2025 framework committed to additional intensification. Second, the cartel-figure transfer framework: the institutionalisation of the February 2025 template under which 29 cartel-aligned figures (including Rafael Caro Quintero, Z-40 Miguel Treviño Morales, and others) had been transferred to US custody. The framework would operate under expedited extradition-and-transfer procedures coordinated through the SRE and the FGR (Fiscalía General de la República). Third, the migration-cooperation framework: continued National Guard deployment to the southern and northern borders; coordination with DHS on flow-management; reception of returned asylum seekers under MPP. Fourth, the Chinese-investment-screening framework: new Mexican-investment-screening requirements for foreign-firm relocation projects, characterised by the Sheinbaum government as alignment with sound investment-promotion practice and by critical-commentary as alignment with the US strategic-economic framework.

9.3 The Framework's Strategic Implications

The framework's strategic implications operate at three levels. At the bilateral level, the framework re-established an operational working bilateral after the post-1-February 2025 acute-tension period; the framework's continued operation through May 2025 indicated that the bilateral could function under the Trump-2 framework without continuous tariff-confrontation. At the regional level, the framework positioned Mexico as the most-operationally-engaged of the Latin American governments with the Trump-2 administration; the contrast with the explicit-confrontational positioning of the Petro government in Colombia (against which Trump imposed brief sanctions in January 2025) and with the post-confrontational reconciliation of the Lula government in Brazil reinforced Mexico's bilateral-strategic positioning. At the systemic level, the framework demonstrated the fundamental asymmetry of the bilateral — the United States retained the dominant negotiating position through its sovereign tariff authority, while Mexico's negotiating leverage operated principally through cooperation-and-supply-chain integration rather than through reciprocal economic coercion. The framework's durability through and beyond the 1 July 2026 USMCA review remains the principal post-2025 trajectory question.

10. The Security Trajectory — García Harfuch and the Cartel Configuration

10.1 The García Harfuch Posture and the Estrategia Nacional de Seguridad

The Sheinbaum government's security posture — operationalised through Secretary of Public Security and Citizen Protection Omar García Harfuch — represents the most-operational departure from the AMLO-era abrazos no balazos framework. The Estrategia Nacional de Seguridad, presented publicly in October 2024 and elaborated through January 2025, operates under four principal pillars: (i) intelligence-led operations focused on high-value targets within the cartel structures; (ii) anti-impunity coordination through enhanced cooperation between the SSPC, the Guardia Nacional (under SEDENA administrative control since the post-AMLO reform), the FGR, and the state-level prosecutorial systems; (iii) prevention through expansion of welfare-and-education programmes in cartel-affected regions; and (iv) respect for human rights as the operational-framework constraint. The framework's distinction from the AMLO posture: the focus on operational-targeted action against cartel structures rather than on the abrazos no balazos avoidance-of-confrontation framework that had characterised AMLO's approach since 2018.

The García Harfuch operational record across the early sexenio produced results across measurable indicators. The post-October 2024 Operativo Frontera Norte sequence — operating across Sinaloa, Jalisco, Sonora, and the Pacific corridor — produced fentanyl-precursor seizures at a tempo substantially exceeding the AMLO-era cumulative. The Sheinbaum government's October 2024 – April 2025 cumulative reported seizures of fentanyl, precursors, and laboratory dismantlements exceeded the 2018–2023 cumulative across multiple categories [TBD-VERIFY: precise comparative figures]. The February 2025 joint US-Mexico operation that transferred 29 cartel-aligned figures (including Rafael Caro Quintero, the Sinaloa Cartel founder who had been convicted in Mexico in 2022 for the 1985 Camarena murder; and Miguel Treviño Morales / Z-40, the Los Zetas leader convicted in Mexico for multiple crimes) to US custody was a operational-cooperation milestone.

10.2 The Sinaloa Cartel Internal Conflict

The post-2024 Sinaloa Cartel internal conflict — between the Chapitos (the Guzmán Loera sons' faction, led by Iván Archivaldo Guzmán Salazar, Jesús Alfredo Guzmán Salazar, Ovidio Guzmán López prior to his 2023 extradition, and Joaquín Guzmán López prior to his July 2024 US apprehension) and the Mayos (the Zambada faction, weakened after Ismael "El Mayo" Zambada's 25 July 2024 US apprehension at El Paso following his reported abduction by Joaquín Guzmán López) — has produced substantial intra-cartel violence across Sinaloa and parts of Sonora, Durango, and the broader Pacific corridor. The conflict's specific dynamics: the post-July 2024 Mayos response to the Zambada apprehension produced sustained armed-confrontation with the Chapitos faction across Culiacán and adjacent cities; the conflict has produced [TBD-VERIFY: precise homicide-count from Sinaloa state-level data] of cartel-attributed homicides through May 2025; the conflict has displaced [TBD-VERIFY: precise displacement figure] residents from Culiacán and adjacent municipalities.

The Sheinbaum government's response to the Sinaloa conflict has been characterised as operationally measured. The principal actions: enhanced Guardia Nacional and SEDENA deployment to Sinaloa; intensified intelligence-led operations against both factions; the prosecution of arrested figures from both factions; and humanitarian response to the displaced population through the SEGOB and state-level coordination. Critical commentary has characterised the response as inadequate to the scale of the violence — homicide rates in Sinaloa state across late 2024 and early 2025 were substantially elevated relative to the pre-conflict baseline. The government's framing has been that the conflict reflects the operational success of US-Mexico cooperation against the cartel leadership rather than a security-policy failure.

10.3 The Broader Cartel Configuration

The broader cartel configuration as of mid-2025 comprises four principal organisations operating across Mexico: the Sinaloa Cartel (in internal conflict); the Cártel Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG, under "El Mencho" Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes); the Cártel del Noreste (CDN, the post-Zetas successor in northeastern Mexico); and the post-2018 emerging Cártel Santa Rosa de Lima (in the Guanajuato Bajío region, focused on huachicoleo). Secondary organisations: the post-2018 emergent groupings in Michoacán (the Cárteles Unidos coalition and Familia Michoacana successors); the Gulf Cartel remnants in Tamaulipas; and the post-2020 emergent groupings in Chiapas (the Familia Michoacana expansion and the local-organisational sub-units). The cartel-state interactions across the early sexenio operate under the García Harfuch operational framework — substantially more confrontational than the AMLO-era posture but operating under continued constraint that the cartel structures retain substantial territorial-and-economic presence across multiple Mexican states.

11. The Continuity-vs-Departure Account, the Judicial-Reform Account, and the Trump-2 Account — Three Frames

11.1 The Continuity-vs-Departure Account

The continuity-vs-departure account is the principal interpretive question for the early Sheinbaum sexenio. The 4T view — articulated through Sheinbaum's mañaneras, through Morena commentary, and through the La Jornada editorial line — holds that the Cuarta Transformación 2.0 is a Sheinbaum-led institutionalisation of the post-2018 realignment that transcends AMLO's personal authority. The principal evidence: the cabinet's professionalisation (de la Fuente, García Harfuch, Bárcena); the Plan México technocratic framing; the climate-policy renewable-energy commitment that departs from AMLO's posture; the operational departure from abrazos no balazos; and the maintenance of the austeridad republicana fiscal framework that has reassured markets. The view holds that Sheinbaum has demonstrated independent governing capacity within a continuous programmatic framework.

The critical view — articulated through Krauze's Letras Libres, through Castañeda's Reforma and El País columns, through Dresser's Reforma and Proceso commentary, and through the broader PAN-PRI-PRD post-2024 commentary — holds that the Cuarta Transformación 2.0 remains a continuation of the AMLO programme operated under AMLO's continued informal authority, even after AMLO's nominal retreat from public political life. The principal evidence: the continuation of the welfare-programme architecture without revision; the maintenance of the energy-sovereignty framework that retains the AMLO-era Pemex and CFE prioritisation; the operational completion of the September 2024 judicial reform that AMLO had initiated; the Morena-PT-PVEM Congressional coalition's continuation of the AMLO-era voting patterns; and the mañanera communication framework that retains the AMLO-era daily-press-conference structure even in modified register. The view holds that Sheinbaum's apparent independent governing capacity operates within a fundamentally AMLO-defined architecture.

The intermediate view — articulated through Bravo Regidor's Aristegui Noticias commentary, through Viridiana Ríos's CIDE working papers and El País columns, through the Nexos editorial line, and through elements of the academic commentariat — holds that the early Sheinbaum sexenio demonstrates a but bounded departure within a continuous programmatic framework: departure on cabinet, communication style, climate policy, and security-policy operations; continuity on welfare, fiscal posture, energy-sovereignty foundations, and constitutional-architectural framework. The intermediate view treats the continuity-vs-departure question as not binary, with the operational departures real but the programmatic foundations continuous. The view holds that the test of the question will be the post-2025 trajectory — particularly the post-1-June-2025 judicial-elections sequence and the post-1-July-2026 USMCA review.

11.2 The Judicial-Reform Account

The judicial-reform account operates across the constitutional-democratic, procedural-democratic, and institutional-trajectory axes that the September 2024 constitutional amendment's contestation has established. The 4T claim: the popular-election framework as a democratic-deepening of the judicial-selection process; the reduction of the SCJN as a streamlining; the 12-year term as a democratic-accountability mechanism; the Tribunal de Disciplina Judicial as a constitutional-disciplinary anchor; and the elimination of the CJF as a removal of an opaque administrative body. The critical claim: the popular-election framework as a politicisation of the federal judiciary; the SCJN reduction as a court-packing-by-attrition; the 12-year term as inadequate to judicial independence; the Tribunal de Disciplina Judicial as a politically-controllable disciplinary body; and the CJF elimination as the removal of a constitutional check.

The early-implementation evidence operates principally through the candidate-nomination and registration sequence across October 2024 – February 2025. The principal observations: the executive-nominated candidates (10 per SCJN seat, plus equivalents for Circuit and District) substantially comprised figures with Morena political-affiliation backgrounds; the legislature-nominated candidates included a substantial proportion of Morena-aligned figures; and the judicial-branch-nominated candidates included a substantial proportion of incumbent federal judges seeking re-validation. The competitive-balance assessment of the post-1-June-2025 election outcome will be the principal early-implementation evidence; the post-1-September-2025 SCJN composition will be the principal institutional-trajectory evidence. The fuller operational record of the judicial reform implementation is anchored at MX-D-04.

The international-comparative observation: the popular-election of judges at the federal level is constitutionally heterodox by international comparative standards. Bolivia, under its 2009 Constitution, conducts popular elections for some senior judicial positions; Switzerland, under its cantonal system, conducts popular elections for some lower-court judges. No major federal-presidential system conducts popular elections for the federal supreme court. The Mexican reform's international-comparative position is therefore substantially novel, and the international-observer commentary (Inter-American Commission, UN Special Rapporteur, Venice Commission) has characterised the framework as constitutionally heterodox.

11.3 The Trump-2 Account

The Trump-2 account operates across the bilateral-management, USMCA-framework, and sovereign-autonomy axes. The government's view — articulated through Sheinbaum's mañaneras, through SRE de la Fuente's communications, and through Economy Secretary Ebrard's commentary — holds that the early-sexenio response has successfully managed the worst tariff shock to the bilateral since the 1970s. The principal evidence: the 3 February 2025 30-day pause secured through direct negotiation; the 6 March 2025 USMCA-compliant carve-out; the 9 April 2025 90-day suspension that produced the negotiation window; the May 2025 cooperation framework that re-established an operational bilateral; the maintenance of Banxico stability through the shock; the peso-dollar exchange rate corridor that has not breached the post-2018 broader range; and the maintenance of USMCA-framework continuity through the 1 July 2026 review preparation. The view holds that the Sheinbaum measured, formal, non-confrontational, but firm positioning has produced an outcome better than the alternatives (full retaliation; acquiescence).

The critical view — articulated through Castañeda's Foreign Affairs commentary, through Dresser's Reforma commentary, and through elements of the El Universal editorial line — holds that the persistence of the tariff regime through May 2025, the absence of a stable USMCA framework, the operational concessions on border deployment and Chinese-investment screening, and the demonstrated bilateral asymmetry collectively demonstrate the structural weakness of Mexico's negotiating position vis-à-vis the United States. The view holds that the Sheinbaum government's positioning, while operationally competent within constraints, has not delivered a stable bilateral framework and has produced a transfer of Mexican sovereignty-and-policy-autonomy to the US strategic-economic agenda.

The intermediate view — articulated through Bravo Regidor's commentary, through Wilson Center and Brookings briefings, and through the Migration Policy Institute analyses — treats the Sheinbaum response as the best available within the structural constraints. The view holds that the operational concessions (border deployment, fentanyl-precursor enforcement intensification, Chinese-investment screening) were in Mexico's policy interest independent of the tariff confrontation; that the bilateral asymmetry is a structural condition that no Mexican government can fundamentally alter through negotiation; and that the Sheinbaum positioning has produced an operational working bilateral that preserves the USMCA framework as the architectural anchor. The view holds that the test of the Trump-2 account will be the post-2025 trajectory through the 1 July 2026 USMCA review.

12. Comparative Latin American Perspective and the Post-2025 Trajectory

12.1 Comparative Latin American Governance Position

The Sheinbaum government's comparative Latin American position operates across electoral mandate, programmatic continuity, and external-positioning axes. On electoral mandate, Sheinbaum's 2024 result (59.76 per cent) substantially exceeds the comparable post-2018 Latin American left-government mandates: Lula in Brazil 2022 (50.9 per cent in the runoff against Bolsonaro); Boric in Chile 2021 (55.9 per cent in the runoff against Kast, but in a substantially smaller country); Petro in Colombia 2022 (50.4 per cent in the runoff against Rodolfo Hernández); Castro in Honduras 2021 (51.1 per cent in a first-round outright win); the Argentine Kirchnerist-Peronist 2019 Fernández-Fernández mandate (48 per cent); and the Maduro 2018 and 2024 contested results. Sheinbaum's mandate, on a 32-point margin, is the strongest of the comparable Latin American results.

On programmatic continuity, the Sheinbaum-AMLO arrangement is structurally distinct from the comparable Latin American left-government succession patterns. The Kirchner-Fernández (2007 Néstor-Cristina-Cristina-Alberto) arrangement in Argentina experienced substantial political-coalition strain that culminated in the 2023 Massa-Milei election loss. The Lula-Dilma (2010 Brazil) arrangement produced the 2014 re-election but collapsed through the 2016 Dilma impeachment. The Chávez-Maduro (2013 Venezuela) arrangement transitioned in a context of mass political-economic collapse. The Morales-Áñez-Arce (2019–2020 Bolivia) arrangement experienced the November 2019 political crisis and subsequent transitions. By comparison, the AMLO-Sheinbaum arrangement has transitioned smoothly, with substantial popular endorsement and operational continuity, in a manner without close parallel in the recent Latin American left-government succession patterns.

On external positioning, the Sheinbaum government has operated the closest-of-the-region operational engagement with the Trump-2 administration. The contrast with the Petro government in Colombia — which experienced the January 2025 brief sanctions confrontation over deportation-flights acceptance — is substantive. The contrast with the Lula government in Brazil — which has operated a confrontational positioning toward Trump-2 alongside continued multilateral engagement with China and Russia — is substantive. The Sheinbaum-Mexico positioning operates as the most-bilaterally-engaged of the major Latin American governments with the second Trump administration, while preserving the formal Estrada Doctrine of non-intervention as the rhetorical-framing principle.

12.2 The Post-2025 Trajectory

The post-2025 trajectory operates across four principal axes through 2030. The judicial-reform implementation axis: the 1 June 2025 first-round elections; the post-1-September-2025 SCJN composition; the [TBD-VERIFY: 2027 second-round elections]; the operational record of the popularly-elected federal judiciary in adjudicating constitutional questions over the post-2025 period. The USMCA-review axis: the 1 July 2026 first-joint-review under Article 34.7; the negotiation track through the May 2025 cooperation framework; the broader trade-architectural evolution under the Trump-2 framework. The electoral-democracy axis: the 2027 mid-term federal-and-state elections; the Morena coalition's ability to retain the Congressional supermajority through the sobrerrepresentación arrangements; the opposition-party-reorganisation question (the PAN-PRI-PRD post-2024 contestation; the MC growth trajectory). The succession axis: the post-2028 internal Morena succession-process, ahead of the 2030 presidential election, which Sheinbaum's sexenio will close on 30 September 2030.

The principal post-2025 trajectory question is whether the Cuarta Transformación 2.0 will institutionalise as a durable political-coalition framework or whether the post-2030 transition will produce a coalition realignment. The institutional-durability claim — advanced by Morena commentary and by some academic-comparative analysis — holds that the post-2018 realignment has reshaped Mexican politics and that the post-2030 transition will operate within the Morena-led framework. The institutional-fragility claim — advanced by Krauze, Castañeda, and some critical-commentary — holds that the post-2018 framework depends on the post-AMLO political-coalition coherence and that the 2027 mid-terms and the 2030 succession will substantially test this. The post-2025 trajectory of these questions will define the operational-historical assessment of the Sheinbaum sexenio and of the post-2018 Mexican political period.

12.3 The Operational Working Hypothesis

The operational working hypothesis as of mid-2025 — held by the principal analytical-commentary frameworks across the Wilson Center, Brookings, CIDE, and academic-comparative analyses — is that the Sheinbaum government has consolidated the post-2018 realignment as the operational architecture of contemporary Mexican governance while operating within substantial constraints. The constraints: the Trump-2 bilateral confrontation that has produced the most-acute external-economic challenge to Mexico in the post-NAFTA period; the judicial-reform implementation that has produced the most-significant institutional contestation in the post-2000 period; the cartel-and-security trajectory that has produced sustained sub-national violence; and the post-2018 political-coalition fragility that depends on the continued Morena-PT-PVEM coherence. The Sheinbaum government's early-sexenio operational record indicates governing capacity within these constraints, with the post-2025 trajectory the test of the durability of this governing capacity.

13. Conclusion — The Early Sheinbaum Sexenio as Test of Coalition Durability

The first eight months of the Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo sexenio — from 1 October 2024 through May 2025 — constitute the most consequential opening period of a post-2000 Mexican presidency. The combination of the largest electoral mandate in modern Mexican history; the operational completion of the most consequential constitutional rewrite of the post-2000 period; the most acute bilateral economic confrontation since the 1970s; and the most substantial cartel-and-security operational departure since the 2006 Calderón Drug War launch — all within an eight-month window — places the early sexenio within an analytical frame of unusual density.

The continuity-vs-departure account is the principal interpretive question. The Sheinbaum government has demonstrated continuity with the AMLO programme on welfare architecture, fiscal posture, energy-sovereignty foundations, and constitutional-architectural framework. The Sheinbaum government has demonstrated departure from the AMLO programme on cabinet professionalisation, communication style, climate-policy renewable-energy commitment, security-policy operational posture, and the operational engagement with the United States. The intermediate position — that the early sexenio demonstrates a but bounded departure within a continuous programmatic framework — is the analytically-most-defensible reading as of mid-2025. The test of this reading will be the post-2025 trajectory.

The judicial-reform account remains in active contestation. The 1 June 2025 first-round judicial elections will provide the principal early-implementation data; the post-1-September-2025 SCJN composition will provide the principal institutional-trajectory data; and the operational record of the popularly-elected federal judiciary will provide the principal democratic-quality data across the post-2025 period. The constitutional-democratic, procedural-democratic, and institutional-trajectory contestation axes that the September 2024 amendment established remain operative; the resolution of the contestation will operate across the post-2025 implementation period.

The Trump-2 account demonstrates the structural asymmetry of the Mexico-US bilateral and the operational capacity of the Sheinbaum government's measured-formal-firm positioning within the asymmetry. The 1 February 2025 tariff imposition; the 3 February 30-day pause; the March 2025 reinstatement and sectoral sequence; the 9 April 2025 90-day suspension; and the May 2025 cooperation framework collectively constitute an operational template that has reduced the acute components of the tariff confrontation while not delivering a stable USMCA framework. The 1 July 2026 USMCA review is the principal post-2025 trajectory test.

The comparative-Latin-American position of the Sheinbaum government — the strongest electoral mandate, the smoothest political-coalition succession, the closest operational engagement with the Trump-2 administration — positions the early sexenio as the most-operationally-secure of the major Latin American left governments as of mid-2025. The post-2025 trajectory will determine whether this operational security translates into durable political-coalition institutionalisation or whether the post-2030 transition will produce substantial realignment.

The Sheinbaum sexenio is the institutional test of the post-2018 Mexican political coalition. Its early-period record has passed the initial test — operational governing capacity within substantial external and internal constraints. The fuller test — durability across the 2027 mid-terms, the 1 July 2026 USMCA review, the post-1-June-2025 judicial-reform implementation, and the post-2030 succession — will operate across the remaining five years of the sexenio and beyond. The early sexenio has demonstrated the operational capacity for the test; the test itself remains in active contestation.

End of MX-D-02. Cross-reference validation pending. Word-count target 10,000–13,000 met. Status [DRAFT]. Version Date 2026-05-15.

Sources

President Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, Discurso de Toma de Posesión (Inaugural Address), Cámara de Diputados, Mexico City, 1 October 2024.
Sheinbaum, Mensaje de los Cien Días (100 Days Address), 8 January 2025; Primer Informe Trimestral, January 2025; Segundo Informe Trimestral, April 2025.
Coordinación General de Comunicación Social y Vocería de la Presidencia, Versiones Estenográficas de las Conferencias de Prensa Matutinas (Sheinbaum-era mañaneras archive, 1 October 2024 onward).
Gobierno de México, Plan México — Plan Nacional de Desarrollo Industrial y de Inversión, presentation 13 January 2025.
Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público, Paquete Económico 2025; Criterios Generales de Política Económica 2025.
Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores (SRE), Comunicados sobre Aranceles y Cooperación Bilateral, November 2024 – May 2025.
Decreto por el que se reforman, adicionan y derogan diversas disposiciones de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, en materia de Reforma del Poder Judicial, Diario Oficial de la Federación, 15 September 2024.
Decretos secundarios y leyes reglamentarias de la Reforma Judicial, Diario Oficial de la Federación, October 2024 – February 2025.
Instituto Nacional Electoral (INE), Cómputos Distritales — Elección Presidencial 2024, certified result 8 June 2024; Acuerdos sobre Elecciones Judiciales 2025.
United States Government, Executive Order 14195 (Imposing Duties to Address the Situation at Our Southern Border), 1 February 2025; subsequent IEEPA executive orders and proclamations, February–May 2025.
United States Trade Representative (USTR), Statements on USMCA Review and Bilateral Track with Mexico, January–May 2025; USMCA-Article-34.7 sunset-review preparation materials.
Banco de México (Banxico), Comunicados de Política Monetaria (October 2024 – May 2025); Informe Trimestral Q4-2024 and Q1-2025.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI), Producto Interno Bruto, Inflación, Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo (October 2024 – April 2025).
Reforma, archive coverage of the campaign, transition, judicial-reform implementation, and the tariff confrontation (2024–2025).
El Universal, archive coverage (2024–2025).
Milenio, archive coverage (2024–2025).
La Jornada, archive coverage from the sympathetic-to-Morena perspective (2024–2025).
Animal Político, investigative reporting and policy-tracking on the cabinet, judicial reform, and security trajectory (2024–2025).
El País México bureau, archive coverage (2024–2025).
Aristegui Noticias, investigative reporting and interviews (2024–2025).
Dresser, Denise, columns in Reforma and Proceso (October 2024 – May 2025); commentary on the judicial-reform implementation and the Trump-2 confrontation.
Castañeda, Jorge G., Foreign Affairs, El País, and Reforma columns (October 2024 – May 2025); commentary on the bilateral and the Sheinbaum continuity-vs-departure question.
Bravo Regidor, Carlos, Aristegui Noticias, Horizontal, and El País commentary (2024–2025) on the post-2024 institutional trajectory.
Ríos, Viridiana, El País and Animal Político columns and CIDE / academic working papers on cartel violence, security, and fiscal posture (2024–2025) [TBD-VERIFY: specific column/paper citations].
Wilson Center Mexico Institute and Brookings Institution Mexico Initiative briefings (October 2024 – May 2025).
Council on Foreign Relations, Latin America's Moment blog, Mexico entries (2024–2025).
Migration Policy Institute (Selee, Andrew, and colleagues), analyses on US–Mexico migration cooperation under the Sheinbaum and second Trump administrations (2024–2025).

MX-A-01: 2000 Vicente Fox Election — End of 71-Year PRI Rule (founding rupture; deep antecedent)
MX-B-01: Peña Nieto Sexenio (2012–2018) — proximate antecedent
MX-C-01: 2018 AMLO Landslide and Morena's Founding Win (the coalition-realignment anchor)
MX-C-02: Cuarta Transformación (4T) Programme — AMLO Presidency 2018–2024 (sister doc, the predecessor era)
MX-D-01: 2024 Sheinbaum Landslide and Morena Supermajority (sister doc, the electoral mandate anchor)
MX-D-03: Trump-2 Tariff Confrontation (2025) — sequel doc, deeper detail
MX-D-04: Implementation of the 2024 Judicial Reform (Judge Elections June 2025) — sequel doc, deeper detail
MX-F-01: Mexico–US Bilateral (2000–present) — context
MX-G-01: Pemex and Energy Architecture (2013–2024) — context for energy-policy continuity
MX-R-01: Mexico Governance Books Canon
MX-E-01: US–Mexico Migration Cooperation — From Remain in Mexico to CBP One to Plan Frontera Norte (2018–2025)
MX-D-05: Sheinbaum Year Two: USMCA 2026 Review and Economic Recalibration (2025-2026)
MX-A-03: back-reference added by symmetry sweep
MX-E-02: back-reference added by symmetry sweep
US-E-04: back-reference added by symmetry sweep
MX-G-02: Mexico's Welfare State — the 4T Social Programmes, the Dismantling of Conditional Cash Transfers, and the Constitutionalisation of Social Rights
MX-H-PRES-02: Felipe Calderón Hinojosa — A Biography
MX-H-PRES-03: Enrique Peña Nieto — A Biography
MX-H-PRES-05: Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo — A Biography
MX-H-PRES-06: Carlos Salinas de Gortari — A Biography
MX-D-06: Sheinbaum Year Two — USMCA Review, Cartel-FTO Confrontation, Migration Management, and the 2027 Mid-Term Trajectory
MX-I-01: The INE and Mexican Electoral Institutional Architecture
MX-K-02: The 2013 Energy Reform and Its Reversal — Pemex, the Opening, and the Counter-Reform