PH-D-03: The 2022 Election and the Marcos Family Restoration (2022–2024)

Status: DRAFTWords: 11,938

1. Key Takeaways

On 9 May 2022, Ferdinand "Bongbong" Romualdez Marcos Jr. was elected President of the Philippines with 31,629,783 votes — 58.77 percent of valid votes cast — the largest absolute-vote total and the largest winning margin in any Philippine presidential election held under the 1987 EDSA Constitution. His closest opponent, sitting Vice-President Maria Leonor "Leni" Robredo, received 14,822,051 votes (27.94 percent). Senator Manny Pacquiao received 3,663,113 votes (6.81 percent) and Senator Panfilo "Ping" Lacson 2,300,000-class votes ([TBD-VERIFY: COMELEC final canvass figure for Lacson — reported in the 2.0–2.3m range across COMELEC presentations]). Voter turnout was 83.07 percent of 65.7 million registered voters, the highest in any post-1986 Philippine presidential election. The result returned the Marcos family to Malacañang Palace thirty-six years and four months after Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was airlifted from the palace by US helicopter on 25 February 1986 (covered in PH-B-05).
The Marcos–Duterte ticket was a deliberate post-2016 dynastic alliance, not a contingent coalition. Marcos Jr.'s vice-presidential running mate was Sara Zimmerman Duterte-Carpio, the daughter of the outgoing president Rodrigo Duterte and herself the sitting Mayor of Davao City. Sara Duterte received 32,208,417 votes (61.53 percent) in the separately tallied vice-presidential race — the highest vote share for any vice-presidential candidate in the same post-1986 era. The ticket combined the Solid North (Ilocos, Cagayan Valley, Region I and II), the Marcos-aligned Romualdez corridor in Leyte, the Duterte stronghold of Davao and much of Mindanao, and substantial inroads into Cebu, Pampanga, and the National Capital Region. The dynastic logic — two pre-Marcos and pre-Duterte authoritarian-era political-family lineages combining at the federal level — distinguished the 2022 result from prior post-EDSA coalitions assembled from looser party-coalition fragments.
The pre-campaign environment was decisively shaped by Vice-President Robredo's March 2021 candidacy announcement and a parallel multi-year social-media rehabilitation of the Marcos family image. Robredo announced she would not seek the presidency in late 2020, then reversed and declared her candidacy on 7 October 2021, framing her campaign as a defence of post-EDSA democratic institutions. Marcos Jr. filed his certificate of candidacy on 6 October 2021. The Marcos campaign benefited from a sustained 2010s social-media campaign — documented by Maria Ressa, Rappler, Vera Files, and the Oxford Internet Institute — that systematically rehabilitated the Marcos-era image, recast martial law as a period of national discipline and infrastructure construction, and circulated revisionist accounts among voters too young to remember 1972–1986 directly. The interpretive contestation over whether the 2022 result reflected a "legitimate democratic mandate" or a "disinformation-shaped outcome" structures Section 11's three-account analysis.
The campaign slogan Babangong Muling ("We Shall Rise Again") and the parallel Robredo-camp Kulay Rosas ang Bukas ("The Future Is Pink") established the symbolic terrain of the contest. Marcos Jr.'s rally events drew crowds estimated by police at 50,000 to 300,000 across major cities ([TBD-VERIFY: highest single-rally attendance estimates vary widely between PNP, organisers, and journalist counts]). Robredo's late-campaign Pasig rally on 7 May 2022 drew a crowd estimated by organisers at 412,000 and by independent media at 200,000–400,000 — the largest single opposition rally in post-EDSA history. The pink-clad volunteer movement (Kakampink) reflected a substantial mobilisation that nonetheless fell short of the Marcos vote ceiling by approximately 17 million votes.
Marcos Jr. was inaugurated as the 17th President of the Philippines on 30 June 2022 at the National Museum of the Philippines on Padre Burgos Avenue, Manila — a venue selected partly to signal continuity with the National Museum's role as a Manila civic centre and partly to avoid the Quirino Grandstand, which had hosted post-1986 inaugurations including those of Cory Aquino (1986), Fidel Ramos (1992), and Rodrigo Duterte (2016). The inaugural address emphasised national reconciliation, post-pandemic economic recovery, infrastructure continuity from the Duterte-era Build Build Build programme, and food security in the context of global commodity-price disruption from the Russia–Ukraine war. The address conspicuously did not address Marcos-era human-rights issues, the PCGG wealth-recovery cases (covered in PH-J-02), or the ICC drug-war proceedings (covered in PH-D-02).
The first Marcos Jr. cabinet combined Marcos-family loyalists, Duterte-era technocrats, and a small number of independent professionals. Vice-President Sara Duterte was concurrently appointed Secretary of Education on 30 June 2022 — an unusual concurrent assignment, structurally similar to but more politically consequential than prior concurrent VP-cabinet roles. Enrique Manalo was appointed Secretary of Foreign Affairs (a career-diplomatic-service appointment continuing from his late-Duterte-era Acting Secretary role). Benjamin Diokno, the outgoing Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Governor, was appointed Secretary of Finance. Jose Faustino Jr. was appointed Officer-in-Charge of National Defense, then replaced by Carlito Galvez Jr. in January 2023, then by Gilberto Teodoro Jr. in June 2023. The cabinet's principal political feature was the concentration of Marcos-aligned figures in economic, energy, and infrastructure portfolios and the placement of Duterte-aligned figures in security-adjacent portfolios.
Economic policy under Marcos Jr. continued and rebranded the Duterte-era Build Build Build infrastructure programme as Build Better More, with a Philippine Development Plan 2023–2028 targeting 6.5–8.0 percent annual GDP growth. Real GDP growth recorded 7.6 percent in 2022 (partly pandemic-rebound), 5.6 percent in 2023, and 5.7 percent in 2024 ([TBD-VERIFY: PSA final figures for 2024 — preliminary releases reported 5.6–5.9 percent]). Inflation peaked at 8.7 percent in January 2023 before declining to 3.9 percent by end-2023 and 2.9 percent by end-2024. The Maharlika Investment Fund, established by Republic Act No. 11954 signed 18 July 2023, became operational in late 2023 with an initial capitalisation of approximately PHP 125 billion ([TBD-VERIFY: precise initial capitalisation figure across DBP, Land Bank, and Bangko Sentral contributions]). The Fund was the most consequential single economic-policy initiative of the first two years and remains contested as of mid-2026.
Foreign policy under Marcos Jr. executed a decisive re-pivot from the Duterte-era China-tilt toward renewed US strategic alignment. The pivot occurred faster and more comprehensively than most analysts expected. On 3 April 2023, the Department of National Defense and US Department of Defense announced four additional Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) "Agreed Locations" — Camilo Osias Naval Base (Sta. Ana, Cagayan), Lal-lo Airport (Lal-lo, Cagayan), Camp Melchor Dela Cruz (Gamu, Isabela), and Balabac Island (Palawan) — bringing the total to nine. On 11 April 2023, the inaugural 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue convened in Washington with Secretaries Blinken, Austin, Manalo, and Galvez. On 1 May 2023, President Biden hosted President Marcos Jr. at the White House. On 3 May 2023, the Bilateral Defense Guidelines were released. The cumulative shift constituted the most substantial US–Philippine strategic deepening since the 1999 Visiting Forces Agreement (covered in PH-F-01).
The post-2022 South China Sea environment deteriorated sharply, with sustained China Coast Guard and maritime-militia operations at Second Thomas Shoal (Ayungin) targeting Philippine resupply missions to the BRP Sierra Madre. Notable incidents included the 5 August 2023 water-cannon incident in which China Coast Guard vessels used water cannons against Philippine resupply boats; the 10 December 2023 incident in which Philippine vessels were rammed and water-cannoned; and the 17 June 2024 boarding incident in which Chinese personnel boarded Philippine resupply craft and injured Philippine Navy personnel. The Marcos administration's response combined sustained public disclosure (the "transparency strategy" coordinated through the National Task Force on the West Philippine Sea), diplomatic protests, and accelerated US-coordination including expanded joint patrols.
The Marcos–Duterte coalition rupture became publicly irreversible in June 2024. Sara Duterte resigned her concurrent post as Secretary of Education on 19 June 2024 while retaining the vice-presidency, citing a sustained pattern of presidential interference and resource-allocation disputes; subsequent statements from both camps escalated into open political opposition. The rupture's structural causes — the Romualdez-faction's congressional consolidation under Speaker Martin Romualdez (the President's first cousin); the Quad Committee and Senate Justice Committee hearings re-opening drug-war questions (covered in PH-D-02); the November 2024 Sara Duterte impeachment trigger; and the December 2024 statement by Vice-President Duterte that she had arranged for an assassin to kill the President, his wife, and Speaker Romualdez should she herself be killed (subsequently characterised by her camp as hypothetical) — constituted one of the most consequential coalition collapses in Philippine post-EDSA political history.
On 11 March 2025, INTERPOL and Philippine authorities arrested former President Rodrigo Duterte at Ninoy Aquino International Airport on his return from Hong Kong, executing the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I arrest warrant of 7 March 2025 (covered in PH-D-02). Duterte was transferred to ICC custody in The Hague the same day, with his initial appearance before Pre-Trial Chamber I occurring on 14 March 2025. The Marcos administration's operational cooperation with the ICC — a sharp departure from its 2022–early-2024 stance — was widely interpreted as both reflecting the Marcos–Duterte rupture and constituting a policy shift. The Duterte camp characterised the arrest as politically motivated; the Marcos camp characterised it as the operation of independent international and Philippine judicial-administrative process. Section 11's three-account analysis works through these contested framings.
The 2022 result invites three structured framings. A pro-Marcos democratic-mandate framing reads the 31.6 million votes and 58.77 percent margin as a popular endorsement that ended what Marcos partisans characterise as a long anti-Marcos elite-cultural-dominance and restored a legitimate political family to power. An anti-Marcos disinformation-rehabilitation framing reads the result as the product of a decade-long systematic rehabilitation of the Marcos-era image through social media and educational-curriculum contestation, particularly directed at voters too young to remember 1972–1986. A comparative-disinformation framing situates the 2022 outcome alongside structurally similar pre-electoral image-rehabilitation patterns in Brazil (Bolsonaro 2018, Lula 2022, Bolsonaro 2026), Hungary (Orbán post-2010), Turkey (Erdoğan post-2014), and India (Modi 2014, 2019, 2024). Each framing carries genuine analytical content and the corpus presents them in parallel without arbitrating a verdict.
For the long arc of Philippine governance, the 2022 election is a paradigm case of post-democratic-authoritarian-leader-family restoration through electoral means — a category distinct from both the conventional "democratic consolidation" trajectory and the conventional "democratic backsliding" trajectory. The Marcos family's return through a competitive multi-candidate election with 83 percent turnout, an absolute majority for the winner, and orderly inauguration distinguishes the Philippine case from both the Latin American transitions of the 1980s and the East Asian transitions of the 1990s. The case will be studied alongside the Fujimori-family restoration attempts in Peru, the Aliyev-family succession in Azerbaijan (a different category), and the Bhutto–Sharif family rotations in Pakistan. Whether the post-2022 Philippine settlement consolidates or fragments will be determined by the 2025 mid-terms, the Sara Duterte impeachment proceedings, and the 2028 presidential succession.

2. Background — The Post-Duterte Succession Question (2021)

By early 2021, the Philippine political class was already converging on the 2022 succession question with unusual intensity. The 1987 EDSA Constitution imposes a single six-year term on the Philippine president (Article VII, Section 4), and Rodrigo Duterte — elected in May 2016 with 39.0 percent of the vote in a five-way race — was constitutionally barred from re-election. The two open succession questions were therefore: who would run as the Duterte-camp continuity candidate, and who would consolidate the anti-Duterte field. Throughout 2020 and into 2021 the answer to neither question was settled. Duterte himself oscillated publicly between three options: running his daughter Sara Duterte-Carpio (then Davao City Mayor) for president; running himself as vice-president as a constitutional manoeuvre to retain proximity to power; or backing his long-serving aide Senator Bong Go. The opposition camp confronted an unfamiliar landscape because the Liberal Party, which had governed under Benigno Aquino III (2010–2016, covered in PH-D-01), had been hollowed out by six years of executive harassment, congressional defections to the Duterte-aligned PDP-Laban, and the 2017–2019 detention of Senator Leila de Lima.

The Duterte presidency had been structurally consequential in three respects that conditioned the succession. First, the war on drugs (covered in PH-D-02) had become both a domestic political signature and an international liability, with the International Criminal Court Prosecutor's Office having opened a preliminary examination in February 2018 and formally requested authorisation for a full investigation on 24 May 2021 (Pre-Trial Chamber I authorising the investigation on 15 September 2021). Second, the Build Build Build infrastructure programme — anchored on a roughly USD 180 billion pipeline of road, rail, airport, and bridge projects — had accelerated public capital expenditure but raised the issue of fiscal sustainability and Chinese-bank involvement in financing several flagship projects. Third, the foreign-policy pivot toward Beijing announced during Duterte's October 2016 state visit to China had produced fewer concrete economic benefits than promised while generating sustained domestic concern about Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea after the favourable July 2016 PCA arbitral award (covered in PH-F-02 and PH-D-04).

The pre-campaign period was also shaped by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Philippine response — coordinated through the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases (IATF) — had imposed one of the world's longest cumulative lockdowns, with metro Manila under enhanced community quarantine for substantial portions of 2020 and 2021. Real GDP contracted by 9.6 percent in 2020, the deepest recession in the post-war record, before recovering at 5.7 percent in 2021. Vaccination rollout, beginning with the 1 March 2021 arrival of Sinovac doses, proceeded slowly through the first half of 2021 and accelerated only after July 2021 with the arrival of WHO COVAX-channel deliveries and US-donated Pfizer and Moderna doses. The pandemic experience produced an electorate that was simultaneously economically distressed, fatigued by sustained quarantine restrictions, and primed for a candidate offering rhetorical promises of normalisation. The Marcos Jr. campaign's eventual "we shall rise again" framing was crafted with this electorate in mind.

A second structural feature of the 2021 environment was the steady multi-year campaign — documented in detail by Rappler, Vera Files, the Oxford Internet Institute's Programme on Democracy and Technology, and academic work by Jonathan Corpus Ong and Jason Vincent Cabañes — to rehabilitate the public memory of the Marcos era through social-media-native content. From the mid-2010s, Facebook, YouTube, and later TikTok had hosted a sustained stream of pro-Marcos content recasting the 1972–1986 martial-law period as one of national discipline, infrastructure construction (the San Juanico Bridge, the Cultural Center of the Philippines, the Philippine Heart Center, the North and South Luzon Expressways), and economic order disrupted by the post-1986 restoration. The rehabilitation was structurally facilitated by the demographic fact that a majority of the 2022 electorate had been born after the 1986 EDSA Revolution and possessed no direct memory of martial law; by curricular contestation in basic education, where coverage of the martial-law period was uneven across school systems; and by the financial resources of the Marcos family, whose post-1986 wealth-recovery cases (covered in PH-J-02) remained largely uncollected.

By mid-2021, the polling landscape had crystallised around a small number of plausible candidates: Marcos Jr., who had served as Senator from 2010 to 2016 and had narrowly lost the 2016 vice-presidential race to Robredo by 263,473 votes (a result he contested unsuccessfully through 2021 in the Presidential Electoral Tribunal); Robredo herself; Manila Mayor Francisco "Isko Moreno" Domagoso; Senator Manny Pacquiao; Senator Panfilo Lacson; and the still-uncommitted Sara Duterte. Pulse Asia and Social Weather Stations (SWS) surveys through the third quarter of 2021 consistently placed Marcos Jr. as the leading or co-leading candidate among those who had declared or were widely expected to declare. The remaining strategic question for the Duterte camp was whether to compete with or to combine with the emerging Marcos candidacy.

3. The Candidacy Announcements — Robredo (March 2021), Marcos Jr. (October 2021), and the Marcos–Duterte Ticket (November 2021 – March 2022)

The 2022 candidate field took final form in a compressed three-month window between September and November 2021, tracking the COMELEC filing period for certificates of candidacy (1 to 8 October 2021, with substitutions permitted through 15 November 2021). The Robredo and Marcos Jr. announcements bracketed this window and structured the rest of the field.

Vice-President Robredo announced her candidacy on 7 October 2021 in a livestreamed address from Quezon City. The address explicitly framed the campaign as a defence of post-EDSA democratic institutions, the 1987 Constitution, and the constitutional accountability mechanisms (the Ombudsman, the Sandiganbayan, the Commission on Human Rights) whose effective operation the opposition argued had been eroded under Duterte. Robredo had publicly stated through late 2020 and into mid-2021 that she would not seek the presidency; her reversal followed sustained pressure from civil-society groups, Catholic episcopal voices, and what remained of the Liberal Party's organised base. Her running mate, announced 6 October 2021, was Senator Francis "Kiko" Pangilinan, a longtime Liberal Party figure with rural-organising credentials through his agriculture portfolio under Aquino III. The ticket ran under a coalition platform branded Tropang Angat ("Team Lift-Up").

Marcos Jr. filed his certificate of candidacy on 6 October 2021 — one day before Robredo — through the Partido Federal ng Pilipinas (PFP), a small party vehicle whose name nodded to Duterte's longstanding federalism advocacy without committing to specific federalism proposals. The filing was preceded by months of speculative positioning during which Marcos Jr. and his sister Senator Imee Marcos engaged in repeated public conversations with the Duterte camp about a possible joint ticket. The Marcos vice-presidential slot remained open through October as the campaign awaited Sara Duterte's decision. Sara Duterte had filed an October 1 certificate of candidacy for re-election as Davao City Mayor; she withdrew that filing on 9 November 2021 and on 13 November 2021 filed instead as the vice-presidential candidate of Lakas-Christian Muslim Democrats (Lakas-CMD), a centrist party historically associated with Fidel Ramos and Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. The Marcos–Sara Duterte combination was thus formalised on 13 November 2021, with the two campaigns running through separate party vehicles but jointly branded as the UniTeam coalition through the campaign period.

Three other candidacies materially shaped the field. Manila Mayor Isko Moreno Domagoso filed for the presidency on 4 October 2021 with running mate Doc Willie Ong, running as a centrist outsider with an Aksyon Demokratiko vehicle that emphasised pandemic-era municipal-service competence. Senator Manny Pacquiao filed under a PDP-Laban factional vehicle (the Pacquiao-Atienza wing, as distinct from the Duterte-aligned PDP-Laban Cusi wing) with running mate Lito Atienza; the Pacquiao campaign emphasised anti-corruption messaging and the candidate's biographical narrative of poverty-to-global-celebrity. Senator Panfilo "Ping" Lacson filed with Senate President Vicente "Tito" Sotto III as running mate, running on a law-enforcement-and-fiscal-discipline platform with Partido Reporma. Several smaller filings (Faisal Mangondato, Jose Montemayor, Norberto Gonzales, Leody de Guzman) ranged from minor protest candidacies to the labour-left de Guzman candidacy whose votes were eventually counted in the very low hundreds of thousands.

The structural feature of the November 2021 settlement was that the anti-Duterte vote remained fragmented across at least four candidacies (Robredo, Moreno, Pacquiao, Lacson) while the Marcos–Duterte combination consolidated both the Duterte-camp base and the multi-decade Marcos following. Yuko Kasuya's Presidential Bandwagon (2009) framework — under which Philippine presidential elections produce a winning coalition by aggregating provincial dynasties and regional vote blocs — predicted strongly that a consolidated Marcos–Duterte ticket against a fragmented opposition would produce a comfortable Marcos majority. Pulse Asia surveys through November 2021 and into early 2022 confirmed this prediction with Marcos consistently polling between 53 and 60 percent against Robredo at 18 to 24 percent and the other candidates in single digits.

The Robredo camp's strategic response was to attempt to consolidate the anti-Marcos vote behind a single candidate. Through January and February 2022, civil-society and Catholic-Church-adjacent figures sought to broker a Moreno or Pacquiao withdrawal in Robredo's favour; both candidates declined. A late-March 2022 attempt to coordinate a "unity candidate" produced a public Moreno call for Robredo to withdraw in his favour — a call that drew sharp criticism from Robredo supporters and accelerated rather than reduced the opposition's fragmentation. By 1 April 2022, six weeks before election day, the field was effectively locked.

4. The Campaign — Babangong Muling, the Pink Movement, and the Disinformation Environment

The 2022 campaign formally opened on 8 February 2022 and ran for ninety days through 7 May 2022, with the COMELEC silence period commencing 8 May 2022. The campaign produced two of the most distinctive mass-mobilisation phenomena in post-EDSA Philippine politics: the Marcos Babangong Muling rally circuit and the Robredo Kakampink (Pink-Side Volunteer) movement. Each generated crowds, branded merchandise, and a recognisable iconography. The contest between them was structured by an asymmetric media environment, an asymmetric digital-content environment, and a substantial gap in candidate availability for adversarial interviews.

The Marcos campaign's rally strategy emphasised large coordinated events in regional capitals across all three island groups, with the candidate and his running mate appearing jointly under coordinated red-and-green colour schemes and tightly produced video segments featuring Marcos-family historical imagery (the elder Marcos in military uniform, the New Society infrastructure projects, the family portraits). Rally crowd sizes were the subject of substantial contestation between Philippine National Police estimates, campaign-organiser claims, and independent journalist counts; Marcos campaign claims of multi-hundred-thousand crowds in cities including Cebu, Iloilo, Lipa, and Pampanga were generally not corroborated by independent counts. The campaign maintained a tightly controlled media environment, with Marcos Jr. declining to participate in the two principal commission-organised presidential debates (the CNN Philippines debate of 27 February 2022 and the COMELEC PiliPinas Debates of 19 March and 3 April 2022) and granting interviews predominantly to friendly outlets and to social-media personalities outside conventional press accreditation.

The Robredo campaign's strategy, by contrast, emphasised volunteer mobilisation, person-to-person organising, and large open-air rallies in opposition-leaning cities. The campaign's pink colour scheme (officially kulay rosas) emerged organically from a January 2022 volunteer initiative and was adopted as the formal campaign palette. House-to-house canvassing — coordinated through a network of barangay-level Kakampink chapters — became a structural feature of the campaign that distinguished it from prior post-EDSA opposition runs. Rally turnouts produced several record-setting opposition crowds: the 18 March 2022 Cavite rally (organisers: 137,000; independent estimates: 100,000+); the 23 April 2022 Pasig rally (organisers: 137,000); the 28 April 2022 Makati rally (organisers: 110,000); and the 7 May 2022 closing miting de avance at Ayala Avenue, Makati (organisers: 412,000; independent estimates clustered around 200,000–400,000). The closing rally was, by independent count, the largest single opposition rally in post-EDSA Philippine history.

The asymmetric digital environment was the defining feature of the campaign. Maria Ressa's How to Stand Up to a Dictator (2022), the Oxford Internet Institute's Computational Propaganda Project working papers, and Rappler's sustained investigative series documented the operation of coordinated content networks across Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and (to a lesser extent) Twitter that systematically disseminated pro-Marcos content, attacked Robredo with personal and gendered attacks, and circulated revisionist accounts of the martial-law period. Facebook took down several networks linked to the Marcos campaign during the campaign period under its Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior policy, but the takedowns were generally too late and too partial to affect content reach. TikTok, where the Marcos campaign was particularly dominant among voters under thirty, applied minimal moderation to political content during the campaign period.

The Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines issued a pastoral letter on 30 January 2022 (A Call to Conversion, Solidarity, and Discernment) that, without naming candidates, urged voters to "elect those who defend life, truth, and the dignity of the human person" and "reject those who would normalise authoritarian rule, historical revisionism, or extrajudicial violence." Individual bishops — including the influential former Caritas Manila head Bishop Broderick Pabillo — issued more pointed endorsements of Robredo. The Church's institutional position was less unified than during the 1986 EDSA Revolution, with several bishops in Marcos-strongholds publicly neutral or supportive of the UniTeam ticket. The Catholic vote, historically a meaningful but never decisive bloc in post-EDSA presidential elections, divided in 2022 in roughly the proportions of the broader electorate.

The campaign's policy content was thin on both sides relative to the symbolic and identity-based mobilisation. Marcos Jr.'s economic platform, released in a 22 February 2022 statement, emphasised continuity with Build Build Build, agricultural productivity (particularly rice self-sufficiency), and pandemic-recovery economic stimulus. Robredo's platform emphasised governance restoration, anti-corruption measures, social-safety-net expansion, and an explicit commitment to cooperate with the ICC drug-war investigation. Neither candidate engaged with the looming inflation question that would shape the early Marcos presidency, the South China Sea question that would become the principal foreign-policy file, or the medium-term fiscal-consolidation question generated by the pandemic-era debt accumulation.

5. The 9 May 2022 Vote — Results, Turnout, and the Largest Post-1986 Margin

Polling stations opened at 6:00 a.m. on Monday 9 May 2022 across approximately 106,000 precincts nationwide and closed at 7:00 p.m. (extended in select precincts where vote-counting machine (VCM) malfunctions were reported). COMELEC reported 65.7 million registered voters and a final turnout of 83.07 percent — the highest in any post-1986 Philippine presidential election. Transmission of precinct-level results to the COMELEC central server began in the late evening of 9 May; by 10:00 p.m. Manila time, with roughly 40 percent of precincts transmitted, the unofficial partial count was already pointing decisively toward a Marcos victory. By the morning of 10 May 2022, with the partial count past 90 percent of precincts, the Marcos lead was insurmountable.

The official canvass conducted jointly by the Senate and House of Representatives (in their constitutional capacity as the National Board of Canvassers for President and Vice-President) was conducted between 24 and 25 May 2022. The joint canvass formally proclaimed Marcos Jr. and Sara Duterte the duly-elected President and Vice-President of the Philippines on 25 May 2022. The official totals were:

President: Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. (PFP) — 31,629,783 votes (58.77 percent); Maria Leonor "Leni" Robredo (independent, Liberal-coalition-supported) — 14,822,051 (27.94 percent); Manny Pacquiao (PROMDI / PDP-Laban-Pacquiao wing) — 3,663,113 (6.81 percent); Francisco "Isko Moreno" Domagoso (Aksyon Demokratiko) — 1,933,909 (3.59 percent); Panfilo Lacson (Partido Reporma) — [TBD-VERIFY: COMELEC final canvass figure widely reported in the 890,000–2,300,000 range across reporting cycles; the lower figure appears in COMELEC's 25 May proclamation tabulation]; Leody de Guzman (PLM) — 90,160; minor candidates totalling approximately 200,000.
Vice-President: Sara Z. Duterte (Lakas-CMD) — 32,208,417 votes (61.53 percent); Francis "Kiko" Pangilinan (Liberal) — 9,329,207 (17.82 percent); Vicente Sotto III (NPC) — 8,251,259 (15.76 percent); five other candidates aggregating approximately 2.5 million.

The Marcos vote share was the largest absolute total and the largest percentage margin in any post-1986 Philippine presidential election. By comparison, Fidel Ramos won in 1992 with 23.6 percent in a seven-way race; Joseph Estrada in 1998 with 39.9 percent; Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in 2004 with 39.5 percent (a contested result, covered in PH-J discussion of the Hello Garci controversy); Benigno Aquino III in 2010 with 42.1 percent; Rodrigo Duterte in 2016 with 39.0 percent. Marcos Jr.'s 58.77 percent was thus the first absolute majority in a Philippine presidential election since the restoration of competitive multi-candidate elections after 1986.

The geographic distribution of the vote produced sharply differentiated regional patterns. The "Solid North" — Ilocos Norte, Ilocos Sur, La Union, Abra, Cagayan, Isabela, Nueva Vizcaya, Quirino, Apayao, Kalinga, Mountain Province, and Ifugao — delivered Marcos majorities in the 80–95 percent range, the highest provincial-cluster margins for any post-1986 winning candidate. The Visayas-region Romualdez corridor (Leyte, Samar, and adjacent provinces) delivered comparable margins, reflecting the maternal-side Romualdez family's century-long political organisation in the region. Mindanao delivered consistently for the UniTeam ticket on Sara Duterte's coattails, with Davao Region producing 90+ percent margins. The Robredo vote was concentrated in her home province of Camarines Sur (where she won), the National Capital Region (where she narrowly lost), and selected Visayan provinces with strong Liberal Party organisation. Pulse Asia post-election analysis indicated that the Marcos vote was modestly stronger among voters aged 18–34 than among voters aged 55+ — an inversion of the conventional assumption that anti-Marcos sentiment correlated negatively with age.

Post-election litigation was minimal. Robredo conceded on 10 May 2022 in a public address that explicitly accepted the result while reaffirming the campaign's institutional commitments. No electoral protest was filed before the Presidential Electoral Tribunal challenging the canvass. The COMELEC operated under its 2022-edition automated election system supplied by Smartmatic, with VCM malfunctions reported at approximately 1,800 precincts (1.7 percent) over the course of election day — within historical operating norms for the automated system. Allegations of large-scale electoral fraud circulated on social media in the days after 9 May but were not formally pressed and did not gain meaningful traction in any institutional venue. The combination of the substantial margin, the orderly canvass, and the rapid concession produced an election the conduct of which — as distinct from the campaign environment that preceded it — was widely accepted as administratively valid by international observers including the European Union Election Observation Mission and the Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL).

6. The 30 June 2022 Inauguration and the First Cabinet

Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. was inaugurated as the 17th President of the Philippines on Thursday 30 June 2022 at the National Museum of the Philippines on Padre Burgos Avenue, Manila. The venue choice was politically and symbolically significant. Post-1986 inaugurations had conventionally been held at the Quirino Grandstand in Luneta (Rizal Park) — Cory Aquino (25 February 1986, originally Club Filipino with formal inauguration the same day); Fidel Ramos (30 June 1992); Joseph Estrada (30 June 1998); Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo (30 June 2004, after her interim 20 January 2001 EDSA-2 oath); Benigno Aquino III (30 June 2010); Rodrigo Duterte (30 June 2016, at Malacañang). The Marcos inaugural at the National Museum signalled both a deliberate distinction from the EDSA-grandstand tradition and a positioning of the new presidency within a "national heritage" framing.

The inaugural address — delivered before approximately 2,500 invited guests including former presidents Joseph Estrada, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, and Rodrigo Duterte (with Benigno Aquino III deceased and Cory Aquino long deceased, and only Fidel Ramos, then ailing, not in attendance) — emphasised four themes: national reconciliation across the post-1986 political divides; post-pandemic economic recovery; infrastructure continuity from Build Build Build; and food security in the context of the Russia–Ukraine war's commodity-price disruption. The address devoted approximately 280 words to a defence of his father's legacy, framing the elder Marcos as a "leader who got things done" without engaging the contested martial-law record. The address did not address Marcos-era human-rights issues (covered in PH-J-01), the PCGG wealth-recovery cases (PH-J-02), or the ICC drug-war proceedings (PH-D-02). Sara Duterte had been sworn in separately as Vice-President on 19 June 2022 in Davao City, an unusual but constitutionally permissible early oath-taking that allowed her to assume office concurrent with the cabinet swearing-in.

The first Marcos cabinet, announced in installments between mid-May and late June 2022 and formally sworn-in on 30 June 2022, combined Marcos-family loyalists, Duterte-era technocrats, and a small number of independent professionals. The principal appointments were:

Foreign Affairs: Enrique A. Manalo, a career foreign-service officer who had been serving as Acting Secretary since the late-Duterte period. Manalo's appointment signalled continuity in the diplomatic establishment and was widely read as a professional rather than political choice.
Finance: Benjamin E. Diokno, the outgoing Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Governor (2019–2022) and a respected economist whose appointment reassured financial markets. Diokno's portfolio included the Maharlika Investment Fund legislation that would become the administration's principal economic-policy file.
Budget and Management: Amenah F. Pangandaman, a Bangko Sentral career official and the first Muslim Filipino to hold the portfolio.
National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA) Director-General: Arsenio M. Balisacan, a former NEDA Director-General under Aquino III, returning to the post.
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Governor (a separate constitutional appointment): Felipe M. Medalla, the outgoing BSP Monetary Board member.
Trade and Industry: Alfredo E. Pascual, former University of the Philippines President.
Justice: Jesus Crispin "Boying" C. Remulla, a Duterte-era PDP-Laban congressman from Cavite.
Interior and Local Government: Benjamin "Benhur" C. Abalos Jr., the Marcos campaign manager.
National Defense (Officer-in-Charge): Jose C. Faustino Jr., a retired AFP Chief of Staff. Faustino served only six months before being replaced in January 2023 by Carlito G. Galvez Jr. (the OPAPRU chief and former AFP Chief of Staff), who in turn was replaced in June 2023 by Gilberto C. Teodoro Jr. (a former Defense Secretary under Arroyo and the 2010 Lakas-Kampi presidential candidate).
Education (concurrent with the Vice-Presidency): Sara Z. Duterte. The concurrent VP-Cabinet assignment, while constitutionally permissible, was politically consequential: it gave the Vice-President executive authority over basic education and substantial budget, and it positioned her for a post-2028 presidential run with an executive-experience portfolio.
Agriculture (initially concurrent with the President): Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. The President's decision to hold the Agriculture portfolio personally for the first year reflected the food-security framing of the inaugural address. Francisco Tiu Laurel Jr. was appointed Agriculture Secretary on 3 November 2023 after the President relinquished the concurrent role.
Health: Teodoro J. Herbosa (from June 2023, replacing OIC Maria Rosario Vergeire).
Public Works and Highways: Manuel M. Bonoan.
Energy: Raphael P.M. Lotilla.
Executive Secretary: Victor D. Rodriguez (until September 2022); Lucas P. Bersamin (former Chief Justice, from September 2022 with overlapping arrangements); Frederick D. Go (Special Assistant for Investment and Economic Affairs from late 2023).

The cabinet's principal political feature was the concentration of Marcos-aligned and dynastic-family figures in economic, energy, and infrastructure portfolios; the placement of Duterte-aligned figures in security-adjacent portfolios (initially); and the retention of career technocrats in finance, foreign affairs, and the BSP. The 11 May 2024 cabinet reshuffle (later) and the June 2024 Sara Duterte resignation (covered in Section 9) would reorder this structure.

7. Economic Policy — Build Better More, the Maharlika Investment Fund, and the 2022–2024 Macroeconomic Record

The Marcos administration's economic policy framework was articulated in the Philippine Development Plan 2023–2028, published by NEDA in January 2023 and approved by the NEDA Board (chaired by the President) on 15 December 2022. The PDP set medium-term growth targets of 6.5–7.5 percent real GDP growth annually (subsequently revised upward to 6.5–8.0 percent for 2024–2028), inflation targets at the 2–4 percent Bangko Sentral band, and a fiscal-consolidation pathway targeting a 3.0 percent fiscal deficit by 2028 (from a pandemic-elevated 7.3 percent in 2021). The infrastructure programme was rebranded from Duterte's Build Build Build to Build Better More, with a flagship list of 194 Infrastructure Flagship Projects (IFPs) carrying a roughly PHP 9 trillion investment requirement through 2028.

The macroeconomic record of the first three years was respectable but uneven. Real GDP growth recorded 7.6 percent in 2022 (a pandemic-rebound figure), 5.6 percent in 2023, and 5.7 percent in 2024 ([TBD-VERIFY: PSA preliminary releases for 2024 reported 5.6–5.9 percent across successive estimates]). The 2022 figure was the highest in post-EDSA growth-rate terms but reflected base effects from the 2020 contraction. The 2023–2024 figures fell short of the PDP target range but exceeded ASEAN peer-average growth rates. Inflation peaked at 8.7 percent year-on-year in January 2023 — driven by global food and energy prices, the depreciation of the peso against the dollar through 2022, and persistent rice and onion supply disruptions — before declining to 3.9 percent by end-2023 and 2.9 percent by end-2024 as global commodity prices eased and the BSP's policy-rate tightening cycle took effect. The BSP raised the overnight reverse repurchase rate from 2.0 percent in May 2022 to 6.5 percent by October 2023, the most rapid tightening cycle in post-1997 monetary history. Unemployment remained in the 4.0–5.0 percent range through the period, with underemployment a more persistent concern at 11–14 percent.

The fiscal position improved slowly. The consolidated public-sector deficit narrowed from 7.3 percent of GDP in 2021 to 6.4 percent in 2022, 6.2 percent in 2023, and an estimated 5.6 percent in 2024 — slower consolidation than the PDP pathway implied. National government debt as a share of GDP peaked at 60.9 percent in 2022, declined to 60.2 percent by end-2024, and remained the highest in the post-1986 record. Tax administration reforms — particularly the Ease of Paying Taxes Act (Republic Act No. 11976, signed January 2024) — modestly raised tax-effort but did not substitute for the broader VAT-expansion and excise-tax reforms that the technocratic consensus had recommended through the campaign period.

The Maharlika Investment Fund — established by Republic Act No. 11954 (the Maharlika Investment Fund Act), signed by President Marcos Jr. on 18 July 2023 — was the most consequential single economic-policy initiative of the first two years. The Fund's design, as enacted, established the Maharlika Investment Corporation (MIC) as a government-owned and -controlled corporation with an initial capitalisation of approximately PHP 125 billion drawn from the Land Bank of the Philippines (PHP 50 billion), the Development Bank of the Philippines (PHP 25 billion), the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (PHP 50 billion in dividends over two years), and the National Government (PHP 50 billion in seed capital). The Fund's stated mandate was to invest across a permitted portfolio of domestic infrastructure, equity in priority sectors, and selected foreign assets, with a long-term return objective above the cost of government borrowing.

The Maharlika legislation drew substantial criticism through the May–July 2023 legislative passage from former Finance Secretaries (including Cesar Purisima and Margarito Teves), the former BSP Governor Felipe Medalla (who later, as a Monetary Board member, voted against the BSP-dividend contribution), academic economists (notably the University of the Philippines School of Economics, which issued a public statement on 5 December 2022), and civil-society groups concerned about governance arrangements. The principal critiques were: (1) sovereign wealth funds globally are funded from current-account surpluses, which the Philippines does not have; (2) the BSP-dividend contribution effectively converted central-bank-balance-sheet capital into fiscal capital, raising central-bank-independence concerns; (3) the governance structure concentrated investment-decision authority in a board with substantial political-appointee composition; and (4) the opportunity cost of PHP 125 billion was substantial against unfunded social-safety-net commitments. The administration's defence emphasised the Fund's developmental rather than savings function, the explicit statutory ring-fencing of pension assets (SSS and GSIS were excluded from contribution after early-stage proposals to include them drew sustained criticism), and the governance protections built into the MIC charter.

The MIC became operationally active in early 2024, with its first board chaired by Rafael D. Consing Jr. (former Bangko Sentral Deputy Governor for Monetary Stability). The Fund's first investment announcements — primarily co-investment positions in domestic infrastructure projects — drew limited public attention through 2024. The longer-term performance and developmental impact of the Maharlika fund remain unsettled questions as of the corpus's mid-2026 cutoff and are flagged for periodic review in subsequent waves.

Beyond Maharlika, three other economic policy strands defined the period. First, the Rice Tariffication Law amendments and the rice-import quota expansions through Executive Order No. 39 (October 2023) brought rice prices down from the early-2024 peak but generated substantial criticism from domestic rice farmers. Second, the CREATE MORE Act (Republic Act No. 12066, signed November 2024) further reformed the corporate-income-tax regime, reducing rates for foreign investors and harmonising fiscal incentives administered by the various Investment Promotion Agencies. Third, the digital-economy build-out — including the National Broadband Plan acceleration and the Department of Information and Communications Technology's connectivity programmes — produced measurable gains in fixed-broadband penetration but slower progress on the rural-mobile coverage gap.

8. Foreign Policy — The US Re-Pivot, EDCA Expansion (April 2023), and the South China Sea Incidents

The Marcos administration's foreign policy executed a decisive re-pivot from the Duterte-era China tilt toward renewed and deepened US strategic alignment. The pivot occurred faster and more comprehensively than most analysts had anticipated at the time of the 2022 election. Three factors drove the shift. First, sustained China Coast Guard and maritime-militia operations in the West Philippine Sea — particularly at Second Thomas Shoal (Ayungin) and Scarborough Shoal (Bajo de Masinloc) — directly affected Philippine sovereignty, fishery access, and resupply of the BRP Sierra Madre garrison. Second, the AFP's institutional preference for the US alliance — long-standing in officer-corps culture, training pipelines, and equipment compatibility — re-asserted itself in the policy process after the Duterte-era political pressure to lean toward China eased. Third, the Biden administration's strategic focus on the Indo-Pacific and on alliance-network building offered concrete deliverables (defence-treaty clarification, military aid, joint-patrol arrangements) that the Marcos administration found attractive.

The first major signal of the pivot came with President Marcos Jr.'s late-September 2022 visit to New York for the UN General Assembly and his meeting with President Biden on the margins. The 22 September 2022 White House readout of the meeting included an explicit reaffirmation of the 1951 Mutual Defense Treaty and a US commitment to upgrade defence and economic cooperation. In November 2022, Vice-President Kamala Harris visited Manila and travelled to Palawan — the first US Vice-Presidential visit to Palawan and a visible signal of US engagement on the West Philippine Sea file. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin visited Manila on 2 February 2023; the visit produced the announcement that the two governments would expand the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) by adding new Agreed Locations.

The EDCA expansion was formally announced on 3 April 2023 by the Department of National Defense and the US Department of Defense. The four new Agreed Locations were:

Camilo Osias Naval Base at Sta. Ana, Cagayan Province (northern Luzon, facing the Bashi Channel and Taiwan)
Lal-lo Airport at Lal-lo, Cagayan Province (a regional airport positioned for runway-capable operations)
Camp Melchor Dela Cruz at Gamu, Isabela Province (northern Luzon interior)
Balabac Island in southern Palawan (facing the South China Sea and proximate to Spratly features)

The four new locations brought the total EDCA-designated sites from five (Antonio Bautista Air Base, Basa Air Base, Fort Magsaysay, Lumbia Air Base, Mactan-Benito Ebuen Air Base) to nine. The geographic distribution of the new sites — three in northern Luzon facing Taiwan, one in southern Palawan facing the South China Sea — drew sharp public criticism from Beijing, which characterised the expansion as Philippine entanglement in US Indo-Pacific strategy. Domestic critics, particularly from the Duterte camp and from sovereignty-oriented voices in academia and civil society, raised concerns about Philippine entanglement in a potential Taiwan-Strait contingency. The administration's response emphasised that EDCA Agreed Locations are not US bases (Philippine sovereignty and command authority over the facilities is reserved); that the locations were selected for humanitarian-assistance and disaster-response capability; and that the agreement was an executive arrangement under the 1951 MDT and 1998 VFA framework requiring no further legislative ratification.

The inaugural US-Philippines 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue convened in Washington D.C. on 11 April 2023, with Secretaries Antony Blinken (State), Lloyd Austin (Defense), Enrique Manalo (DFA), and Carlito Galvez Jr. (DND, then serving as Acting). The 2+2 joint statement endorsed the EDCA expansion, announced negotiation of Bilateral Defense Guidelines, committed to a substantial increase in Foreign Military Financing for the Philippines, and announced expanded joint-exercise programmes including the Balikatan annual exercise (which expanded to approximately 17,600 participants in April 2023, the largest in the exercise's history). The Bilateral Defense Guidelines, released on 3 May 2023, formally clarified that Article IV of the 1951 MDT — the mutual-defence commitment — extends to "armed attacks on either of our armed forces, public vessels, or aircraft, including those of our Coast Guards, anywhere in the South China Sea." This clarification, long sought by the Philippine side and granted in earlier non-binding form during the Pompeo period in 2019, was now formalised in written guidelines.

President Marcos Jr.'s state visit to the United States from 30 April to 4 May 2023 included a 1 May 2023 White House meeting with President Biden producing a joint statement that reaffirmed the alliance, announced USD 100 million in Foreign Military Financing for FY2023 (the largest single annual allocation in recent memory), and committed to deepening trilateral cooperation with Japan. The trilateral track — anchored by the April 2024 Camp David-style trilateral leaders' summit involving Presidents Biden and Marcos Jr. and Prime Minister Kishida — would become a feature of the Indo-Pacific architecture through 2024.

The South China Sea environment deteriorated sharply over the same period. The Marcos administration adopted what officials called a "transparency strategy" — a deliberate public-disclosure approach in which Philippine Coast Guard and AFP Western Command operations publicly released video and photographic documentation of Chinese Coast Guard and maritime-militia actions. The strategy was coordinated through the National Task Force on the West Philippine Sea (NTF-WPS), chaired by the National Security Council and including DFA, DND, DOJ, BFAR, and PCG. Major incidents included:

5 August 2023: China Coast Guard vessels used water cannons against Philippine resupply boats approaching the BRP Sierra Madre at Second Thomas Shoal. The incident, documented in Philippine Coast Guard video footage released the same day, generated international condemnation and a formal Philippine diplomatic protest.
10 December 2023: Chinese vessels rammed and water-cannoned Philippine resupply craft at Second Thomas Shoal, injuring multiple Philippine Navy personnel.
5 March 2024: A water-cannon and ramming incident injured four Philippine Navy personnel and damaged a Philippine Coast Guard vessel.
17 June 2024: Chinese Coast Guard personnel boarded Philippine resupply craft, seized firearms and equipment, and injured Philippine Navy personnel including the loss of a finger by one sailor — the most physically aggressive incident of the post-2022 period.

Following the June 2024 incident, the Philippines and China negotiated a modus vivendi on Second Thomas Shoal resupply, announced in late July 2024, under which the Philippines could conduct routine humanitarian resupply of the Sierra Madre garrison subject to procedural notifications. The arrangement reduced friction at Second Thomas Shoal but did not address Scarborough Shoal, Sabina Shoal, or other contested features where lower-intensity incidents continued through late 2024 and into 2025. The transparency strategy was widely regarded by foreign-policy analysts including Aries Arugay (Diplomat and East Asia Forum essays) and Greg Poling (CSIS Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative) as successful in mobilising international diplomatic support, though it did not produce concessions from Beijing on the underlying maritime claims.

9. The 2024 Marcos–Duterte Coalition Rupture — Sara's June 2024 Resignation and the Romualdez Consolidation

The UniTeam coalition was structurally fragile from the start. Three structural fault lines — congressional speakership control, the drug-war ICC question, and the post-2028 presidential succession — generated friction from the first year and erupted publicly through 2023 and 2024. The rupture's milestones can be traced through six events.

First, the contest for the Speakership of the House of Representatives in mid-2022 was resolved in favour of Martin G. Romualdez, the President's first cousin and a senior Lakas-CMD figure from Leyte. The Speakership confers substantial budget-and-legislative-agenda authority, and Romualdez consolidated the position with an unusually large supermajority by Philippine standards. Duterte-aligned legislators, while initially incorporated into the supermajority, increasingly chafed at what they perceived as Romualdez-faction control of legislative committee assignments, the Confidential and Intelligence Funds (CIF) allocations, and the pork-barrel-equivalent district-allotment process. The 2023 budget cycle and particularly the 2024 budget cycle saw repeated public disputes over the Office of the Vice-President's CIF allocations — which under prior administrations had received minimal scrutiny but which the House began to question in detail.

Second, the Quad Committee of the House (combining four standing committees including Public Order, Dangerous Drugs, Human Rights, and Public Accounts) began hearings in mid-2024 on the conduct of the Duterte-era drug war (covered in PH-D-02 and PH-J-05). The hearings, which compelled testimony from former PNP officials including former Chief Ronald "Bato" dela Rosa (then a sitting Senator), produced substantial under-oath testimony about command-and-control of the drug war and about specific operations. The Senate Justice Committee, under Senator Risa Hontiveros, ran a parallel investigation through late 2024 and early 2025. The hearings eroded the legal and political protection the drug-war record had previously enjoyed and signalled that the Marcos administration's earlier 2022–2023 statements that the Philippines would not cooperate with the ICC were no longer operative.

Third, Sara Duterte's resignation from the Department of Education on 19 June 2024 was announced through a Davao City press statement. The resignation citation emphasised "the time has come for me to focus on the Office of the Vice-President" but the backdrop included the prior weeks' House budget hearings questioning the OVP's CIF allocations, a public falling-out with First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos over educational-policy direction, and the President's late-May 2024 cabinet reshuffle that had not consulted the Vice-President on appointments adjacent to her portfolio. The resignation was the first public signal that the UniTeam coalition no longer functioned as a coalition.

Fourth, the period from July to November 2024 saw escalating public statements from both camps. Vice-President Duterte gave a series of media interviews characterising the Marcos administration as "ineffective" and "weaponising" state machinery against the Duterte family. Former President Duterte gave a 28 January 2025 press conference at the Senate Blue Ribbon Committee (which he attended in response to a subpoena) in which he challenged the ICC's jurisdiction and reiterated his sole-responsibility framing of the drug war.

Fifth, on 23 November 2024, in a 3:00 a.m. livestreamed press conference, Vice-President Duterte stated that she had spoken with someone to arrange to have President Marcos, First Lady Liza Araneta-Marcos, and Speaker Romualdez killed should she herself be killed. The statement, later characterised by her camp as a "hypothetical illustration" of her sense of personal danger, was the subject of immediate Department of Justice referrals, a National Bureau of Investigation case file, and a 25 November 2024 House resolution initiating impeachment-preparatory proceedings.

Sixth, on 4 February 2025, the House of Representatives transmitted Articles of Impeachment to the Senate against Vice-President Sara Duterte. The impeachment articles included betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes, drawing principally on the CIF-allocation evidence and the 23 November 2024 statement. The Senate impeachment trial, scheduled to convene in mid-2025, was postponed past the May 2025 mid-term elections — a postponement that itself became contested. As of the corpus's mid-2026 cutoff, the impeachment proceeding remains a live and consequential institutional matter (covered in detail in PH-J-06).

The Romualdez consolidation — the parallel process by which Speaker Martin Romualdez extended the Marcos-Romualdez faction's grip on the House, the COMELEC budget allocations, and selected Cabinet appointments — proceeded through the same period. By early 2025, Romualdez was widely understood to be positioning for the 2028 presidential race, with internal UniTeam endorsement of Sara Duterte explicitly off the table. The post-2028 succession question, originally resolved in 2022 as a Marcos-then-Sara-Duterte rotation, was effectively reopened.

10. The Duterte ICC Pursuit and the 11 March 2025 Arrest

The ICC's Pre-Trial Chamber I authorised the formal investigation into the Philippine drug war on 15 September 2021, finding reasonable basis to believe that crimes against humanity of murder, torture, and other inhumane acts had been committed in the context of the drug war from 1 November 2011 (covering the Davao Death Squad period during Duterte's mayoralty) through 16 March 2019 (the date the Philippines' ICC withdrawal took effect). The Marcos administration's initial public posture in 2022–2023 was that the Philippines would not cooperate with the ICC investigation on the grounds that domestic-jurisdiction mechanisms were available and that the Philippines was no longer a State Party. This position was articulated by then-Solicitor General Menardo Guevarra and by Justice Secretary Crispin Remulla in multiple public statements through 2023.

The administration's position shifted materially during 2024. In November 2024, Justice Secretary Remulla stated publicly that the Philippines was "open to" cooperation with the ICC and that the Department of Justice was reviewing legal arrangements that would permit cooperation. The shift was structurally connected to the Quad Committee hearings (Section 9) which had produced substantial domestic-jurisdictional fact-finding, to the broader Marcos–Duterte rupture, and to the international diplomatic signalling utility of cooperation with the ICC for an administration positioning itself as a rule-of-law alternative to its predecessor. By late 2024, foreign-affairs and justice-department officials were quietly coordinating with INTERPOL and (through diplomatic channels) with the ICC Office of the Prosecutor.

On 7 March 2025, ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I issued an arrest warrant for Rodrigo Roa Duterte on charges of crimes against humanity of murder. The warrant was unsealed on 11 March 2025. INTERPOL transmitted the warrant to the Philippine government through the standard Red Notice channel.

On 11 March 2025, former President Duterte arrived at Ninoy Aquino International Airport (Terminal 3) on a Cathay Pacific flight from Hong Kong, where he had been speaking at an OFW community event the previous evening. Philippine Bureau of Immigration officers, coordinating with PNP and INTERPOL liaison personnel, served the arrest warrant on arrival. Duterte was processed at NAIA, transferred to Villamor Air Base, and placed aboard a chartered jet that departed for the Netherlands later the same day. He was received by ICC custody officers at Rotterdam Airport on the morning of 12 March 2025 (Manila time) and transferred to the ICC Detention Centre in Scheveningen, The Hague. His initial appearance before Pre-Trial Chamber I occurred on 14 March 2025.

The Marcos administration's operational cooperation with the ICC was a sharp departure from its 2022–early-2024 stance and was widely interpreted as both reflecting the post-June-2024 Marcos–Duterte rupture and constituting a policy shift. The Duterte camp — including his daughter Vice-President Sara Duterte, his son Davao City Mayor Sebastian "Baste" Duterte, and Senator Bato dela Rosa — characterised the arrest as politically motivated, procedurally irregular (Senator dela Rosa argued the arrest violated Philippine constitutional protections), and a foreign-jurisdiction overreach. The Marcos camp characterised the arrest as the operation of independent international and Philippine judicial-administrative process, conducted on technically clean grounds under standard INTERPOL procedure, with the Marcos administration's role limited to non-obstruction of the warrant execution. Both characterisations carry analytical content, and Section 11 below works through the contested framings.

The Duterte ICC proceedings will continue through 2026 and beyond, with confirmation-of-charges hearings, trial preparation, and likely trial itself extending across multiple years. The evidentiary record assembled by the ICC Office of the Prosecutor — drawing on Philippine PNP and DOJ documentation, NGO documentation by groups including Rise Up for Life and for Rights and the Commission on Human Rights, and post-2024 Quad Committee testimony — is substantial. The proceedings are covered in operational detail in PH-D-02 and in evidentiary detail in PH-J-05.

11. Three Accounts of the 2022 Restoration

The 2022 result and the 2022–2025 Marcos restoration admit three different analytical framings. The corpus presents them in parallel, each with serious supporting evidence and serious limitations.

(a) The pro-Marcos democratic-mandate account. Under this framing, the 31.6 million votes and 58.77 percent margin are read as a popular endorsement of the Marcos–Duterte ticket on the merits of the candidate, his platform, and the electorate's evaluation of the post-1986 political settlement. Marcos partisans — and academic voices including selected Filipino legal scholars and historians who have argued for a re-evaluation of the elder Marcos's economic record — emphasise that the 2022 election was conducted under the 1987 EDSA Constitution, in a competitive multi-candidate field, with COMELEC administration that international observers regarded as administratively valid, with an 83 percent turnout, and with an immediate concession by the principal opponent. The result, on this account, ended what Marcos partisans characterise as a multi-decade anti-Marcos elite-cultural dominance — concentrated in Metro Manila professional classes, the Catholic episcopal hierarchy, and English-language broadsheet journalism — and restored a legitimate political family to power against the wishes of that elite. The Marcos Jr. administration's economic record (respectable growth, declining inflation, accelerated infrastructure delivery), its foreign-policy record (decisive defence of Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea), and its institutional record (orderly cabinet operation, cooperation with ICC after evidentiary thresholds were met) are read as validating the electorate's choice. The account's strongest evidence is the size and structure of the vote itself; its principal limitation is its difficulty accounting for the systematic pre-2022 informational environment in which the campaign was conducted.

(b) The anti-Marcos disinformation-rehabilitation account. Under this framing, the 2022 result is read as the product of a decade-long systematic rehabilitation of the Marcos-era image through social media, educational-curricular contestation, and the persistent under-collection of PCGG wealth-recovery claims. The account, developed most thoroughly by Maria Ressa, Sheila Coronel, Mark R. Thompson, and the Rappler and Vera Files investigative archives, emphasises that voters under thirty had no direct memory of the 1972–1986 period; that systematic content networks operating across Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok disseminated revisionist accounts of martial law and personal attacks on Robredo; that Philippine basic-education curricula varied across school systems in their coverage of martial law; and that the Marcos family's post-1986 wealth, much of which remains unrecovered by PCGG, financed the rehabilitation infrastructure. The 58.77 percent margin, on this account, is not a sufficient condition for legitimacy because the electorate's information environment had been structured by sustained campaign that operated outside the bounds of conventional electoral regulation. Coronel's Atlantic essay "The Vote That Brought the Marcoses Back" (12 May 2022) and her Foreign Affairs essay "How the Philippines Became Ground Zero for Disinformation" (July/August 2022) are canonical statements of this account. The account's strongest evidence is the documented operation of content networks, the documented curricular contestation, and the documented financial resources of the Marcos family; its principal limitation is the difficulty of measuring how much of the 31.6 million Marcos vote can be attributed to the disinformation environment versus material, regional, and partisan factors that would have operated regardless.

(c) The structural-dynastic account. Under this framing, the 2022 result is read as an expected outcome of the long-standing structural features of Philippine politics — political-dynasty consolidation, presidential-bandwagon dynamics under multi-candidate plurality elections, the absence of effective anti-dynasty legislation despite the 1987 Constitution's Article II Section 26, and the systematic post-EDSA hollowing of programmatic parties. The account, developed in Kasuya's Presidential Bandwagon (2009), Mendoza's dynasty research at the Asian Institute of Management Policy Center, McCoy's An Anarchy of Families (1994), and Abinales and Amoroso's State and Society in the Philippines (2017), emphasises that Philippine presidential elections systematically favour candidates who can aggregate the largest coalition of provincial dynastic networks; that the Marcos–Duterte combination assembled the strongest such coalition in 2022; and that the fragmented anti-Marcos field reflected the structural difficulty of constructing programmatic opposition coalitions absent functioning national parties. The account's strongest evidence is the comparative pattern across post-EDSA presidential elections (each won by the candidate with the largest dynastic coalition); its principal limitation is the difficulty of distinguishing structural inevitability from contingent strategic choices that the opposition could have made differently.

The corpus does not arbitrate among these accounts. Each carries analytical content; each has limitations; each will be empirically tested by the trajectory of the 2025 mid-terms, the impeachment proceedings, and the 2028 succession. The corpus's contribution is to present the accounts in parallel with the evidentiary base for each.

12. Comparative Framing — Post-Authoritarian Family Restorations and Post-2016 Disinformation

The 2022 Marcos restoration sits within two cross-national comparative frames worth setting out for the corpus's purposes.

The first comparative frame is post-authoritarian family restoration through electoral means. Cross-nationally, the cases include: the Fujimori family in Peru (Keiko Fujimori's three presidential candidacies — 2011, 2016, 2021 — each producing run-off losses; her father Alberto Fujimori's 2007 conviction and subsequent pardon politics); the Bhutto–Sharif family rotations in Pakistan (PPP and PML-N alternating governments across multiple decades, both with patriarchs who were assassinated or executed); the Aliyev family succession in Azerbaijan (Heydar to Ilham, conducted within a non-competitive electoral framework — a different category); the Kenyatta family in Kenya (Jomo Kenyatta to Uhuru Kenyatta, with multi-decade interludes); the Park family in South Korea (Park Chung-hee's daughter Park Geun-hye's 2012 election and 2017 impeachment); the Aquino-Cojuangco family in the Philippines itself (Ninoy → Cory → Noynoy; covered in PH-D-01); and the Bandaranaike-Rajapaksa rotations in Sri Lanka. The Marcos case is distinguished from these by three features: the length of the interregnum (36 years, longer than most comparable cases); the conduct of the restoration through a competitive multi-candidate election with an absolute majority (rather than a runoff, a parliamentary coalition, or a non-competitive election); and the simultaneity of the family-of-the-predecessor (Duterte) component, which combined two authoritarian-era family lineages on the same ticket.

The second comparative frame is post-2016 electoral outcomes shaped by sustained pre-electoral disinformation environments. The cases include: the 2016 Brexit referendum and the 2016 US election, both with documented Russian-coordinated content operations and platform-policy gaps; the 2018 Brazil election (Bolsonaro's WhatsApp-driven campaign); the 2019 Indian general election (Modi-aligned WhatsApp and Twitter networks); the 2022 Brazil election (Bolsonaro vs. Lula, with continued WhatsApp and Telegram contestation); the 2024 Indonesia election (covered in the Indonesia corpus); and the 2024 US election. The Philippine 2022 case is distinguished within this set by the unusually long lead-time of the rehabilitation campaign (a decade-plus rather than an election-cycle), by the specifically family-restoration character of the political project (rather than a programmatic-policy project), and by the absence of substantial platform-policy intervention by Facebook, YouTube, or TikTok during the campaign period proper.

Together, the two comparative frames suggest that the 2022 Philippine result is genuinely novel in some respects (the family-restoration character, the long lead-time of the rehabilitation campaign) and continuous with broader cross-national patterns in others (the absolute-majority outcome under structural dynastic conditions, the platform-shaped information environment). The corpus will revisit the comparative framing in PH-O-04 (Dynasty Persistence Beyond 2030) and in cross-country wave outputs.

13. Forward View — The 2025 Mid-Terms, the Impeachment Track, and the Long Arc of Restoration

Three live institutional processes will determine whether the post-2022 Philippine settlement consolidates or fragments.

First, the 12 May 2025 mid-term elections — for half of the Senate (12 seats), the full House of Representatives, all provincial governors and vice-governors, all mayors and vice-mayors, all sangguniang panlalawigan, panlungsod, and bayan members, and the first formal BARMM Parliament elections (postponed from 2022) — will provide the first electoral test of the post-rupture coalition landscape. The senatorial slates, in particular, were structured around the Marcos–Duterte rupture: the Alyansa para sa Bagong Pilipinas slate aligned with the Marcos administration; the PDP and DuterTen slates aligned with the Duterte camp; the Liberal-Akbayan-Citizens' Battle for Change slate aligned with the post-Robredo opposition. The May 2025 results will indicate the relative strength of each camp and will condition the 2025–2028 legislative environment. As of the corpus's mid-2026 cutoff, preliminary post-mid-term analysis suggests a mixed result with both camps recording wins, the post-Robredo opposition recovering moderate ground, and Senator Bam Aquino's strong showing as a signal of Liberal-coalition residual capacity. Detailed coverage is reserved for PH-E-04.

Second, the Senate impeachment trial of Vice-President Sara Duterte, scheduled to begin in mid-2025, will determine the constitutional and political status of the Vice-Presidency through the remainder of the Marcos term. A two-thirds Senate vote (16 of 24 senators) is required for conviction; conviction would result in removal from office and disqualification from future office; acquittal would leave the Vice-President in office through 2028. The trial's procedural conduct, the evidentiary record assembled, and the eventual vote will shape the post-2028 presidential succession. Detailed coverage is reserved for PH-J-06.

Third, the Duterte ICC proceedings will continue through confirmation-of-charges and (likely) trial across multiple years. The proceedings will produce a substantial public evidentiary record on the drug war (covered in PH-D-02 and PH-J-05) and will continue to structure the Marcos–Duterte political dynamic.

Beyond these three processes, the longer-term structural questions include: whether the Build Better More infrastructure delivery accelerates sufficiently to underwrite the medium-term growth targets; whether the Maharlika Investment Fund's governance and investment record validates or fails the design choices made in 2023; whether the US re-pivot and the EDCA-expanded posture deter or invite Chinese coercion in the West Philippine Sea; whether the 2028 succession resolves into a competitive multi-candidate field or consolidates around a Marcos-Romualdez successor candidate; and whether the post-2022 Philippine settlement consolidates as a stable post-authoritarian-family-restoration equilibrium or fragments into renewed cycles of contestation. Each of these is a live empirical question as of the corpus's mid-2026 cutoff.

14. Conclusion

The 9 May 2022 presidential election returned the Marcos family to Malacañang Palace thirty-six years and four months after Ferdinand E. Marcos Sr. was airlifted from the palace by US helicopter on 25 February 1986. The return was conducted through a competitive multi-candidate election, with 83 percent turnout, an absolute majority for the winner, an orderly canvass and proclamation, an immediate concession by the principal opponent, and an inauguration that proceeded without institutional disruption. The election was, by the formal criteria the post-1986 Philippine political order has applied to its presidential transitions, valid. It was also, by the criteria that critics — domestic and international — have applied to the post-2016 information environment in which it was conducted, shaped by a multi-year systematic rehabilitation of the Marcos-era image and by an asymmetric digital-content ecosystem. Both characterisations are accurate; neither alone is sufficient.

The Marcos Jr. presidency that followed has been more institutionally conventional and consequential than either friendly or hostile pre-election commentary anticipated. The administration executed a decisive foreign-policy re-pivot toward the United States, expanded the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, defended Philippine maritime sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea through a deliberate transparency strategy, presided over respectable post-pandemic macroeconomic recovery, and — over the course of 2024 — operationally cooperated with the International Criminal Court's pursuit of the former President. It also presided over the public rupture of the UniTeam coalition that elected it, the impeachment of the Vice-President who was its electoral asset, the arrest of the former President who was the coalition's other principal, and a substantial concentration of political-and-financial control under the Romualdez-faction. Whether the post-2022 settlement consolidates or fragments will be determined by institutional processes — the impeachment trial, the ICC proceedings, the 2025 mid-terms, the 2028 succession — that are still unfolding.

For the long arc of Philippine governance, the 2022 election is a paradigm case of post-democratic-authoritarian-leader-family restoration through electoral means. It is a category distinct from both the conventional "democratic consolidation" trajectory associated with the post-1986 Philippine narrative and the conventional "democratic backsliding" trajectory associated with cross-national post-2010 patterns. The Philippine case is a third category — restoration through orderly electoral means, conducted within an asymmetric information environment, producing an administration that is institutionally conventional in many respects and transformative in others — that does not map cleanly onto either of the more familiar templates. The corpus's contribution is to document the case in its full institutional and political detail, to present the contested framings in parallel, and to provide subsequent waves and subsequent researchers with the evidentiary base on which to revise these accounts as new evidence and new outcomes accumulate.

Sources

Commission on Elections (COMELEC) of the Republic of the Philippines. Official Canvass of Votes for President and Vice-President, 9 May 2022 National Elections. Manila: COMELEC, 25 May 2022 (transmitted to the joint Congressional canvassing session).
Congress of the Philippines. Joint Resolution Proclaiming Ferdinand "Bongbong" R. Marcos Jr. and Sara Z. Duterte the Duly Elected President and Vice-President. Manila, 25 May 2022.
Office of the President of the Philippines. Inaugural Address of President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., National Museum of the Philippines, 30 June 2022.
Office of the President. First State of the Nation Address of President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., 25 July 2022; Second SONA, 24 July 2023; Third SONA, 22 July 2024.
National Economic and Development Authority (NEDA). Philippine Development Plan 2023–2028. Manila: NEDA, 2023.
Republic Act No. 11954 (2023) — Maharlika Investment Fund Act; and Implementing Rules and Regulations issued by the Department of Finance, October 2023.
Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) and US Department of State. Bilateral Defense Guidelines, joint release, 3 May 2023.
DFA and US Department of State. Joint Statement of the 2+2 Ministerial Dialogue, Washington D.C., 11 April 2023.
Department of National Defense (Philippines) and US Department of Defense. List of Additional EDCA Agreed Locations, joint announcement, 3 April 2023.
White House. Joint Statement of President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. and President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr., Washington D.C., 1 May 2023.
ICC, Pre-Trial Chamber I. Arrest Warrant for Rodrigo Roa Duterte, 7 March 2025 (unsealed 11 March 2025).
Abinales, Patricio N. and Donna J. Amoroso. State and Society in the Philippines. Second edition. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.
Kasuya, Yuko. Presidential Bandwagon: Parties and Party Systems in the Philippines. Manila: Anvil and Keio University Press, 2009.
Curato, Nicole, ed. A Duterte Reader: Critical Essays on Rodrigo Duterte's Early Presidency. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2017; and Curato, Nicole. Democracy in a Time of Misery. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
Thompson, Mark R. "The Marcoses' Return to Malacañang: Disinformation, Dynasty, and the Erosion of Anti-Marcos Memory." Critical Asian Studies 55, no. 1 (2023): 1–22.
Arugay, Aries A. "Stronger Together? The Marcos–Duterte Alliance and Its Cracks." East Asia Forum, 8 February 2024; and Arugay, Aries A. "Marcos Jr. After Two Years." The Diplomat, 30 June 2024.
Coronel, Sheila S. "The Vote That Brought the Marcoses Back." The Atlantic, 12 May 2022; and Coronel, Sheila S. "How the Philippines Became Ground Zero for Disinformation." Foreign Affairs, July/August 2022.
Ressa, Maria. How to Stand Up to a Dictator: The Fight for Our Future. London: WH Allen, 2022.
Miller, Jonathan. Duterte Harry: Fire and Fury in the Philippines. London: Scribe, 2018.
Philippine Daily Inquirer, Philippine Star, Rappler, Vera Files, CNN Philippines, ABS-CBN News, GMA News — sustained 2021–2025 coverage of the campaign, transition, presidency, and Marcos–Duterte rupture.
Pernia, Ronald A. "The Robredo Pink Movement and the 2022 Election." Philippine Political Science Journal 44, no. 1 (2023): 65–90.
Mendoza, Ronald U. and Jurel Yap. "Political Dynasties and the 2022 Philippine Election." Asian Institute of Management Policy Center Working Paper, August 2022.

PH-H-PRES-04: Rodrigo Roa Duterte (1945–)
PH-H-PRES-03: Ferdinand Romualdez Marcos Jr. — "Bongbong" (1957–)
PH-A-01: From Revolution to Commonwealth (1898–1935) — colonial inheritance and the constitutional inheritance the Marcoses returned to
PH-B-04: The Aquino Assassination (21 August 1983) — origin of the anti-Marcos opposition this restoration overcame
PH-B-05: EDSA Revolution (22–25 February 1986) — the 1986 ouster against which the 2022 result is measured
PH-C-01: Cory Aquino's Restoration Presidency (1986–1992) — the post-EDSA settlement now challenged
PH-C-02: Fidel V. Ramos and the "Philippines 2000" Programme — earlier post-EDSA presidency baseline
PH-C-03: Estrada's Presidency and EDSA-2 Removal (1998–2001) — earlier extra-electoral removal precedent
PH-D-01: Noynoy Aquino's Presidency (2010–2016) — the immediate pre-Duterte anti-Marcos administration
PH-D-02: The War on Drugs — Numbers, Mechanics, and the ICC Investigation — the Duterte-era inheritance Marcos Jr. assumed and renegotiated
PH-F-01: The US–Philippines Strategic Relationship (1898–2024) — the alliance framework the post-2022 re-pivot operated within
PH-R-01: Philippines Governance Books Canon — source-canon anchor
PH-D-05: The 2025 Midterm Election, the Marcos–Duterte Rupture, and the Sara Duterte Impeachment Saga
PH-F-03: The Renewed US–Philippines Alliance: EDCA Expansion, South China Sea Crisis, and the Squad Architecture (2022–2025)
PH-K-05: Charter Change (Cha-Cha) Attempts in the Philippines: From 1987 Constitution Foundations to the 2024 People's Initiative Failure
PH-D-06: Senate impeachment trial of VP Sara Duterte 2025-2026
PH-D-07: Philippines post-impeachment polity reset + 2028 pre-campaign 2025-2026
PH-F-02: Duterte's Independent Foreign Policy and the China Pivot
PH-K-06: The March 2025 Duterte ICC Arrest Decision
PH-K-07: The January 2013 Philippines–China PCA Arbitration Filing Decision
PH-I-01: The Philippine Supreme Court and Judicial Politics
PH-N-01: The Philippines in International Perceptions — People-Power Icon and Frontline State
PH-J-01: the Documented Toll and the Plunder Record, the EDSA Settlement's Non-Reckoning, the 1991 Return and the 2016 Libingan Burial, the Disinformation-Era "Golden Age" Revival, the 2022 Election as the Restoration's Completion, and the Contest Among the Never-Again/Human-Rights Account, the Golden-Age/Vindication Account, and the Elite-Settlement/Structural Account
PH-M-01: People Power as Political Idea — From EDSA to Its Exhaustion