PE-H-PRES-07: Dina Ercilia Boluarte Zegarra — A Biography (1962– )

1. Key Takeaways

• Dina Ercilia Boluarte Zegarra was born on 31 May 1962 in the district capital of Chalhuanca, province of Aymaraes, department of Apurímac, in the southern Peruvian Andean sierra. The Aymaraes province lies at approximately 2,900 metres above sea level on the eastern flank of the Cordillera de Huanzo, in the upper Apurímac watershed; the district name itself derives from the pre-Hispanic Chanka-and-Aymara-descended ayllu network that occupied the high puna and the quebrada valleys of the upper Apurímac. The maternal line of the Zegarra household was Quechua- and Aymara-descended through the Chalhuanca and Antabamba campesina networks; the paternal Boluarte name was a castellanizado surname of mixed-descent origin common across the southern Apurímac and adjacent Ayacucho regions. The household occupied an intermediate stratum in the post-1969 Reforma Agraria social structure of the upper-Apurímac valley — neither hacienda-descended landowner nor landless agricultural labourer, but a small-holding-and-trading family of the rural-municipal class. Boluarte's biographical positioning — born in the southernmost Andean periphery, with maternal Quechua-Aymara descent, in a castellano-speaking household with rural-municipal-administrative connections — is the constitutive starting condition for her later political identity, and the contestation over her significance after December 2022 has frequently invoked this positioning in incompatible ways.

• Boluarte's formal education proceeded through primary and secondary schooling in Chalhuanca and the provincial capital network of the upper Apurímac through the late 1970s, followed by the relocation to Lima in approximately 1978 to pursue undergraduate study. She entered the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM) — the principal public university of Peru, founded in 1551 and the historic alma mater of much of the Peruvian state-administrative-and-political class — and graduated from the Facultad de Derecho y Ciencia Política with the title of abogada in approximately 1988. The UNMSM law-faculty cohort of the mid-to-late 1980s included a distinctive intersection of provincial-migrant students, urban Lima middle-class students, and the activist political networks of the 1980s left and the fujimorismo-emergent right; Boluarte's UNMSM period overlapped with the most acute internal-armed-conflict years (the 1986 El Frontón prison massacre, the 1988 Cayara massacre, the 1989 deepening Sendero Luminoso urban campaign, and the 1990 Fujimori electoral irruption) but the available public record does not indicate that Boluarte was a participant in any of the principal student-political organisations of the period. The UNMSM credential placed her in the broad middle of the Peruvian legal-professional class — credentialed but without the elite-private-university (PUCP, Universidad de Lima, Universidad del Pacífico) network access that has shaped much of the post-2000 Peruvian political class.

• The 1988–2002 early professional period was occupied by notarial and paralegal work in central Lima — the cluster of small legal-services offices that supported the Notaría Pública and Registros Públicos infrastructure of the Peruvian capital. The detail of this period is incomplete in the public record: Boluarte's Declaración Jurada and CV filings during the 2021 candidacy and the subsequent presidency identified the principal employer as the Notaría Loyola (a Lima Centro notarial office) and adjacent paralegal-services firms, with intermittent freelance legal-services work. The post-2024 Caso Rolex investigation has examined this period for any evidence of the early-career income foundation that the post-2021 luxury-item accumulation has invoked; [TBD-VERIFY: the Fiscalía's investigation findings on the 1988–2002 period, in particular the income-and-asset reconciliation, have been the subject of partial disclosures through 2024–2025 but the comprehensive carpeta fiscal findings remain unpublished as of the document's writing date in June 2026]. The professional positioning of the period was lower-middle-class Lima legal-services — a position that the post-2021 political-attack cycle would invoke as evidence of an obscure-and-unremarkable career trajectory ill-suited to the demands of the Presidency.

• The 2002–2020 RENIEC career was the substantive professional formation of Boluarte's working life. The Registro Nacional de Identificación y Estado Civil — the post-1995 Peruvian state agency responsible for the Documento Nacional de Identidad (DNI) and the civil-registration system — was created under the Fujimori-era administrative reforms and consolidated under the post-2000 Toledo period as a relatively professional and politically-insulated Servicio Civil agency. Boluarte entered RENIEC in approximately 2002, in a junior-administrative legal-services capacity at the San Juan de Lurigancho district office (the largest Lima district by population, with approximately one million residents in the early 2000s); she progressed through the institutional grades over the following eighteen years, with successive postings at the Surquillo district office (mid-2000s through 2010s) and at the RENIEC central administrative offices in Lima during the late 2010s. By the end of the period she had reached a jefatura distrital level — a middle-senior administrative position within the agency. The eighteen-year RENIEC tenure produced a working life of administrative routine, with limited public visibility and no significant political-controversy record; this trajectory was the empirical foundation of the cargo público identity that the 2021 candidacy invoked.

• Boluarte's political entry occurred late in life and proceeded through the Perú Libre party of Vladimir Cerrón Rojas — the Andean-Marxist regional vehicle founded in Junín in 2007 and consolidated as a national party through 2016. Boluarte registered as a Perú Libre affiliate in approximately 2018 and ran on the Perú Libre Congressional list for Lima in the 26 January 2020 extraordinary Congressional election (the post-Vizcarra dissolution-of-Congress cycle). She did not win a seat. The pre-2021 political record was therefore minimal: a single unsuccessful Congressional candidacy, an eighteen-year civil-service career without significant political-network engagement, and a party affiliation of approximately three years. The 2021 elevation to the Perú Libre presidential ticket as Castillo's primera vicepresidenta was a function of the party's internal-balancing requirements (an Andean-coastal balance, a gender balance, and a professional-credential balance to complement Castillo's rural-teacher profile) rather than of any independent national-political track record on her part. The 6 June 2021 second-round victory therefore placed in the Vice Presidency a figure whose biographical positioning was Andean and credentialled-civil-servant but whose national-political experience was effectively negligible.

• The 28 July 2021 inauguration as Vice President was accompanied by a concurrent appointment as Minister of Development and Social Inclusion (MIDIS) in the first Castillo cabinet — the cabinet sworn in on 30 July 2021 under Prime Minister Guido Bellido. The MIDIS portfolio is the Peruvian state's principal social-protection coordination agency, encompassing the Pensión 65 rural elderly-pension, the Juntos conditional-cash-transfer programme, the Cuna Más child-and-infant programme, the FONIE infrastructure-for-inclusion fund, and the Qali Warma school-feeding programme. Boluarte's MIDIS tenure ran from 28 July 2021 to 25 November 2022 — approximately sixteen months — through three Castillo prime ministers (Bellido, Vásquez, Torres) and through the Castillo–Cerrón internal Perú Libre rupture that consolidated in late 2021 and through 2022. Boluarte was a relatively low-profile minister within the cabinet; her MIDIS administrative record was unexceptional within the post-2016 trajectory of the portfolio. Her principal political significance during the Vice Presidency lay in her position as Castillo's constitutional successor and in her gradually-deteriorating relationship with the Cerrón faction of Perú Libre — a trajectory she navigated through public-distancing statements but without a clean party-affiliation break before December 2022.

• The 7 December 2022 succession occurred at approximately 15:00 hours, immediately following the Congressional vacancia vote against Castillo (101 votes in favour, 6 against, 10 abstentions — comfortably exceeding the 87-vote two-thirds threshold under Article 113.2 of the 1993 Constitution). Boluarte was sworn in by the President of Congress, José Williams Zapata, in the Hemiciclo of the Congress of the Republic, becoming the 69th President of Peru and the first woman to hold the office. Her brief inaugural address — approximately fifteen minutes in length — committed her to "respect for the rule of law and democratic institutions", to a gobierno de amplia base (broad-based government), and to "a process of national dialogue" aimed at the principal social-and-political tensions exposed by the Castillo crisis. The succession was constitutionally regular under Article 115 of the 1993 Constitution; the political legitimacy of the succession, however, was immediately contested by the Castillo coalition and by significant segments of the Andean-rural opposition, on the grounds that Boluarte had been elected as Castillo's running-mate and had no independent electoral mandate of her own and that her party-affiliation distancing from Perú Libre during the Vice Presidency had not amounted to a clean break.

• The December 2022 – April 2023 protest cycle (documented in PE-D-03) produced the mass-casualty episode that has defined the international and domestic perception of the Boluarte presidency. The Comisión Multisectorial — the official Peruvian government body charged with the post-protest review, created under Resolución Ministerial No. 0123-2023-PCM — produced an Informe Final recording 67 cumulative deaths under its inclusion criteria; the Defensoría del Pueblo's case-by-case methodology produced a 49-direct-plus-11-protest-adjacent figure; the IACHR May 2023 country report recorded approximately 60 deaths under its broader inclusion criteria; Amnesty International's May 2023 Racism and Repression report applied yet broader criteria. [TBD-VERIFY: the precise inclusion-criteria differences among the Comisión Multisectorial 67, the IACHR 60, the CNDDHH figure, and the Defensoría 49-plus-11 figures require careful reconciliation against the original case-by-case records; the figures here are the principal institutional reports.] The forensic record (FAL 7.62 mm, AKM 7.62 mm, and AR-15 5.56 mm ammunition recovered from the principal incident sites — Andahuaylas 11–12 December 2022, Ayacucho 15 December 2022, Juliaca 9 January 2023) and the demographic profile of the dead (overwhelmingly young Quechua- and Aymara-speaking men with median age in the early twenties) established the cycle's character as a mass-casualty Andean-rural-and-indigenous event. The Boluarte government characterised the response as the legitimate exercise of state authority against terrorist-aligned mobilisation; the IACHR May 2023 country report concluded that "extrajudicial executions" had occurred within the Inter-American jurisprudential meaning.

• The Boluarte cabinet trajectory passed through three Presidents of the Council of Ministers in the 2022–2025 period: Pedro Angulo Arana (10–21 December 2022, the 11-day transitional formation of the first two weeks); Luis Alberto Otárola Peñaranda (21 December 2022 – 6 March 2024, the 14-month-and-14-day architectural cabinet that managed the protest period, the El Niño coastal flooding, and the early macroeconomic recession); and Gustavo Adrianzén Olaya (6 March 2024 – ongoing as of mid-2026, the post-Rolex stabiliser who has now become the longest-serving PCM of the Boluarte presidency, exceeding the Otárola tenure). The Otárola resignation on 6 March 2024 was triggered by the Caso Yaziré Pinedo leaked audio recording suggesting that Otárola had used his ministerial position to advance the public-sector employment of a young woman with whom he had a personal relationship; the timing — immediately preceding the 15 March 2024 Caso Rolex disclosure — was widely read in Peruvian commentary as not coincidental, with the Adrianzén appointment being interpreted as a defensive personnel rotation in anticipation of a foreseeable institutional shock.

• The 15 March 2024 Caso Rolex disclosure — published by Wayka.pe under the byline of Gianella Tapullima and the Wayka investigative team — was the most consequential single corruption disclosure against a sitting Peruvian President since the 2018 Pedro Pablo Kuczynski resignation cycle. The Wayka investigation documented at least eleven Rolex watches and additional Cartier and Bulgari items in Boluarte's possession that had not been declared in her Declaración Jurada before the SUNAT and the Contraloría. The cumulative estimated retail value [TBD-VERIFY: approximately US$500,000 across the disclosed items, with individual-piece valuations ranging from approximately US$14,000 to over US$40,000; the Fiscalía's own comprehensive valuation report has not been fully released as of the document's writing date]. On 22 March 2024 the Fiscalía under interim Fiscal de la Nación Juan Carlos Villena, supported by the Policía Nacional, executed a judicially-authorised allanamiento (search) of Boluarte's personal residence in Surquillo (Lima) and her office at the Palacio de Gobierno — the first search of a sitting Peruvian president's residence in the modern democratic period. The constitutional-accusation process advanced into the Subcomisión de Acusaciones Constitucionales del Congreso through 2024–2025 but did not produce a vacancia vote: the post-2022 protective Congressional coalition continued to hold.

• The Los Waykis en la Sombra investigation — the name given by the Fiscalía to the broader Boluarte-circle corruption-and-influence-trafficking case file that emerged from the post-Rolex enlargement of the principal carpeta fiscal — implicates a circle of family members, RENIEC-period colleagues, and post-2021 cabinet figures alleged to have served as intermediaries for selected favours and contractual arrangements. The principal figure named in the public-record reporting is Boluarte's brother, Nicanor Boluarte Zegarra, who has been investigated for his alleged role in Caso Los Hijos del Cóndor — a parallel sub-case concerning the alleged use of the presidential apparatus to influence regional-level contracting and prefectoral appointments. [TBD-VERIFY: the Los Waykis case is at the investigación preparatoria stage as of mid-2026; the formal accusation has not been filed by the Fiscalía and the specific charge inventory remains provisional.] The investigation has been treated in Peruvian commentary as the central post-Castillo prosecutorial case against the presidential apparatus itself — analogous, in its institutional consequence, to the post-Lava Jato investigations that implicated Toledo, Humala, Kuczynski, and the late García. The eventual disposition of the case will be one of the principal trajectories of the post-2026 period.

• The 2024–2025 vacancia survival sequence produced a structural-political pattern in which the Boluarte presidency, despite an unprecedented sustained-low approval rating (the IEP, Ipsos Perú, and IPSOS–El Comercio polling series have placed her between 3 and 12 per cent for almost the entire period since mid-2023, with the lowest single reading at 3 per cent in April 2024 immediately after the Caso Rolex disclosure), has survived through the mutual-low-approval-mutual-survival pattern between the Presidency and a Congressional coalition (Fuerza Popular, Alianza para el Progreso, Acción Popular, Renovación Popular, Avanza País, plus rotating support from Somos Perú and Podemos Perú) whose own approval rating is even lower (Congressional approval of 3–7 per cent throughout the period). The institutional name for the arrangement in Peruvian commentary is la sociedad de la sobrevivencia — the survival partnership — coined by Vergara in El Comercio (October 2023) and adopted across the academic and commentary literature. The pattern reflects the absence of an electoral-mandate-bearing alternative to either the Boluarte presidency or the post-2022 Congressional majority; both rest on continued mutual non-removal rather than on positive popular legitimacy.

• The post-2022 contestation over the Boluarte presidency has crystallised around three accounts. The survival-and-continuity account (held by the Boluarte–Adrianzén government, the principal Congressional bloc, segments of the Lima business establishment, and selected international commentary) holds that Peru avoided constitutional collapse after 7 December 2022; that the protest cycle was contained without recourse to broader-scale violence; that the macroeconomic recovery has been delivered; and that the bicameralism reform of Ley No. 32101 (6 March 2024) is the most-substantive institutional renewal since 1993. The legitimacy-deficit account (held by IACHR, CNDDHH, IDEHPUCP, the Andean rural and indigenous opposition, much academic-Peruvian commentary, and the protestadores coalition) holds that the government lacks an electoral mandate, that the protest-period casualties remain without accountability, that the Caso Rolex reflects systemic personal-enrichment patterns, and that the prosecutorial-architecture manipulation through the 2024 Junta Nacional de Justicia – Tribunal Constitucional dispute over Patricia Benavides constituted institutional capture. The structural-permanent-crisis account (held by Vergara, Levitsky, Cameron, Meléndez, Muñoz, and the long-arc historiographical tradition including McClintock's recent essays) holds that the Boluarte period is a manifestation rather than a cause of the deeper post-2000 presidential-system instability; that five presidents in five years (Vizcarra, Merino, Sagasti, Castillo, Boluarte) is the structural fact; and that the 12 April 2026 General Election will determine whether the trajectory ends or extends. The corpus does not arbitrate among the three accounts; each is internally consistent and each captures a real feature of the post-2022 period.

• The forward view from 2026 holds three open questions. First, whether Boluarte completes her constitutional term to 28 July 2026 (the vacancia threshold of 87 votes remains the principal institutional protection; the post-March-2024 Congressional configuration has shown no sustained indication of crossing it absent a further institutional rupture). Second, whether the 12 April 2026 General Election under the restored bicameral framework produces a successor President capable of constructing a working Congressional coalition or whether the unicameral-era pattern of minority-presidency-and-perpetual-Congressional-conflict reproduces in modified bicameral form (PE-D-05). Third, whether the post-presidency Boluarte trajectory — the eventual disposition of the Caso Rolex, Los Waykis en la Sombra, and the protest-period casualties cases, all of which would advance materially after the lifting of presidential immunity on 28 July 2026 — produces a prosecutorial sequence analogous to the post-Castillo, post-Toledo, and post-Kuczynski cases or whether the survival-partnership pattern produces a different outcome. The Boluarte biography, in the spirit of the Castillo biography that precedes it (PE-H-PRES-06), is not a closed history but the second central document of a continuing post-2022 Peruvian political reconfiguration.

---

2. Chalhuanca, Aymaraes, and the Upper-Apurímac Sierra (1962–1978)

Dina Ercilia Boluarte Zegarra was born on 31 May 1962 in Chalhuanca, provincial capital of Aymaraes, department of Apurímac — a remote southern-Andean district roughly five hours by truck from the departmental capital of Abancay and over thirty hours from Lima, with a single primary school, a small secondary school, and no hospital. Her father [TBD-VERIFY: the public record on the father's full name varies across post-2021 biographical sketches; the principal Wayka.pe and IDL-Reporteros reconstructions give the name as Severo Tomás Boluarte, although alternative renderings appear in other reporting] was a small-holder-and-trader in the district; her mother [TBD-VERIFY: Juana Zegarra, in the principal reconstructions; alternative renderings as Juana Rosa or Juana Zegarra Bernuy appear in different sources] managed the household. The family occupied what the Peruvian sociological literature calls the rural-municipal class — a small-holding-and-trading stratum distinct from both the landowning elite and the landless campesino base, and the demographic source of much of the post-1960s Andean professional-emigrant class.

Boluarte completed secondary schooling in approximately 1978 [TBD-VERIFY: the secondary-school institutional sequence in the public-record biographical sketches is incomplete; the principal reconstructions identify the Colegio Nacional de Chalhuanca as the principal institution but do not fully reconcile against the post-2021 Declaración Jurada educational records] — a top-decile educational attainment for her birth cohort in Aymaraes province — and migrated to Lima that year for university study, a transition her household's trading income made feasible in a way it would not have been for a landless-labourer family. Her UNMSM entry coincided with the return to electoral democracy under the second Belaúnde government and with the opening months of the Sendero Luminoso internal-armed-conflict period.

---

3. UNMSM, the 1980s Law Faculty, and the Lima Transition (1978–1988)

3.1 The Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos in the 1980s

Boluarte enrolled in approximately 1978–1979 in the Facultad de Derecho y Ciencia Política of the Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos — Peru's oldest public university and the historic alma mater of much of the state-administrative-and-political class. The 1980s UNMSM was a politically intense campus, its student space structured by the APRA-affiliated Frente Universitario Aprista, the Marxist-revolutionary Comando Universitario Popular, the Federación de Estudiantes de San Marcos, and — after 1980 — semi-clandestine Sendero Luminoso-aligned currents, an intensity that culminated in the Armed Forces' 21 May 1991 intervención of the campus.

3.2 Boluarte's UNMSM Cohort and Curriculum

Boluarte graduated with the title of abogada in approximately 1988 — a ten-year span from entry to degree that was not unusual for UNMSM students of the period, given part-time work, periodic university closures, and the bachillerato-then-título sequence. [TBD-VERIFY: Boluarte's UNMSM thesis title, defended in approximately 1987–1988, is recorded in the university's Biblioteca Central catalogue but the precise title and content are not fully reconstructed in the post-2021 public-record reporting]. Her graduation placed her professional entry in the most acute crisis years of the first García presidency — hyperinflation, the 1986 El Frontón and 1988 Cayara massacres, and the deepening Sendero Luminoso urban campaign.

3.3 The UNMSM Cohort and Political Affiliations

The available public record does not indicate that Boluarte was an active participant in any of the principal student-political organisations of the period. The post-2021 biographical reporting has examined her UNMSM affiliations in some detail and has produced no documentation of FUA, CUP, FUSM-leadership, or Sendero-related affiliation. The reporting consistent with the available record positions Boluarte as a relatively non-political student of the period — focused on the completion of the academic programme and on the practical-legal-career preparation that the UNMSM Facultad de Derecho provided.

This non-political-student positioning is consistent with the broader pattern of the 1980s UNMSM provincial-migrant professional cohort: a substantial portion of the cohort, while ideologically diverse, prioritised academic completion and the entry into the professional middle class over sustained student-political-organisational engagement. The post-2021 contestation over Boluarte's political identity has occasionally invoked the absence of a documented 1980s political-organisational affiliation as evidence either of her late-political-formation status (a feature consistent with her late-life political entry through Perú Libre after 2018) or of her political-instrumentality (the Perú Libre affiliation having been one of convenience rather than of long-arc conviction). The corpus does not arbitrate between these readings; the empirical record supports the late-political-formation observation but does not adjudicate the deeper interpretive question.

3.4 The Lima Transition

Boluarte's move to Lima combined an educational transition with a social-and-cultural one, from the upper-Apurímac rural-municipal setting into a metropolitan Lima then absorbing the post-1970s desborde popular internal-migration wave [TBD-VERIFY: the specific Lima districts of residence during the UNMSM period are not fully reconstructed in the public record; the principal reporting indicates lower-cost central and southern Lima districts but does not specify the precise barrios or jirones]. The post-2021 contestation has invoked the transition in incompatible ways — as evidence of authentic Andean-origin identity, or as evidence of assimilation into a Lima-establishment identity disconnected from the Andean rural and indigenous coalition that elected the Perú Libre ticket.

---

4. The 1988–2002 Notarial and Paralegal Period — Early Lima Professional Life

4.1 The Post-Graduation Professional Environment

Boluarte's 1988 graduation coincided with the collapse of formal legal employment amid hyperinflation, the deepening Sendero Luminoso and MRTA campaigns, and the elite Lima law firms' preference for private-university graduates; unable to access that track, she entered the notarial-and-paralegal sector — a lower-tier but public-university-accessible entry point into the legal profession.

4.2 The Notarial-and-Paralegal Working Life

Boluarte's principal employer through most of the 1988–2002 period was the Notaría Loyola (Lima Centro), on a modest, lower-middle-class income — the recognisable career track of a substantial cohort of public-university abogados who remained in the lower-middle-class legal-services stratum for most of their working lives, without upward mobility into elite-firm or senior-civil-service positions. Her 2002 entry into RENIEC marked her transition out of this stratum into the more stable, progression-oriented Servicio Civil track.

4.3 The Post-2024 Investigation of the Period

The post-2024 Caso Rolex investigation has examined the 1988–2002 period for evidence of any early-career income foundation that could explain the post-2021 luxury-item accumulation. The principal investigative line, advanced by the Fiscalía under the carpeta fiscal associated with the Caso Rolex, has sought to reconcile Boluarte's declared 1988–2002 income (the working-life total computed from her successive employment records) against any asset-accumulation patterns dated to the period. [TBD-VERIFY: the Fiscalía's findings on the 1988–2002 income-and-asset reconciliation have been the subject of partial disclosures through 2024–2025 but the comprehensive carpeta fiscal findings remain unpublished as of the document's writing date; the Boluarte defence has consistently argued that any post-2021 luxury items were either loans from family-and-friends networks or were acquired through pre-existing inheritance-and-savings sources, while the Fiscalía's preliminary working hypothesis has been that the post-2021 accumulation is inconsistent with the documented working-life income profile.]

The investigation of the period is one of the principal procedural-evidentiary battlegrounds of the Caso Rolex trajectory and will be one of the factors shaping the eventual disposition of the case after the 28 July 2026 lifting of presidential immunity. The corpus treats the 1988–2002 period as analytically distinct from the post-2021 enrichment question, but notes that the two periods are operationally connected in the prosecutorial architecture.

4.4 Personal Life and the Nicanor Boluarte Relationship

Boluarte married [TBD-VERIFY: the principal Wayka.pe and IDL-Reporteros reconstructions identify her marriage to Wálter Ibis Limaylla in approximately the late 1980s or early 1990s; the marriage produced two children, daughter Gabriela and son Luis Alberto, with the precise birth dates not fully documented in the public record] and later separated, raising her two children as a single mother through her 2002 entry into RENIEC.

The governance-relevant thread from this period is her relationship with her brother, Nicanor Boluarte Zegarra — like Dina a Chalhuanca-to-Lima migrant and, before 2021, a relatively low-profile Lima legal-and-political-services professional. His post-2022 role in the presidential apparatus became the subject of the Los Waykis en la Sombra and Caso Los Hijos del Cóndor sub-investigations (Section 12); the pre-2022 record of the relationship is otherwise unremarkable.

---

5. The RENIEC Civil-Service Career (2002–2020) — An Administrative Trajectory

5.1 The Institutional Context of RENIEC

The Registro Nacional de Identificación y Estado Civil — Peru's national identification-and-civil-registration agency — was created under Ley No. 26497 of 12 July 1995, in the post-1993-Constitution reorganisation of the Peruvian state-administrative architecture. The agency was structured as a Organismo Constitucionalmente Autónomo — a constitutionally-autonomous body with budgetary and personnel-management autonomy from the executive branch, modelled on the post-1993 design of the Banco Central de Reserva, the Defensoría del Pueblo, and the principal electoral organs (the Jurado Nacional de Elecciones and the Oficina Nacional de Procesos Electorales). RENIEC's principal functions were the issuance and management of the Documento Nacional de Identidad (DNI, the standard identity document for Peruvian citizens), the maintenance of the Registro Único de Identificación de las Personas Naturales (RUIPN), the civil-registration functions (births, marriages, deaths) previously distributed across the municipal registries, and the support of the electoral process through the maintenance of the electoral register.

By the early 2000s, when Boluarte entered the agency, RENIEC had consolidated as one of the more professional and politically-insulated agencies of the Peruvian state. The post-2000 Toledo period saw the systematic strengthening of the Servicio Civil framework within RENIEC, with merit-based recruitment, structured career-grade progression, and limited political-appointee turnover. The agency's reputation in the post-2000 period was as one of the better-functioning Peruvian state institutions — comparable in institutional capacity to the BCRP, the SUNAT (tax administration), and the principal electoral organs.

5.2 Boluarte's Entry and Initial Postings (2002–2010)

Boluarte entered RENIEC in approximately 2002, in a junior-administrative legal-services capacity. Her initial posting was at the RENIEC district office serving San Juan de Lurigancho — the largest Lima district by population, with approximately 800,000 to one million residents in the early 2000s. The district office's functions included DNI issuance for the resident population, civil-registration intake (births, marriages, deaths), and the coordination of operativos (mobile DNI-issuance campaigns) in the underserved sectors of the district. The legal-services function within the office handled the processing of complex documentation cases, the review of disputed civil-registration entries, the coordination with the judiciary on legal-status-rectification matters, and the institutional liaison with the district municipal authorities.

The San Juan de Lurigancho posting placed Boluarte in direct contact with the post-1980s migrant population that constituted the principal demographic of the district. The DNI-issuance and civil-registration work in the district routinely encountered cases involving incomplete or absent documentation from the Andean rural regions of origin — a working environment that connected Boluarte's professional life back to the rural-Andean documentation gaps that her own Chalhuanca-Apurímac origins had reflected. The biographical commentary of the post-2021 period has occasionally invoked this San Juan de Lurigancho posting as a formative experience that shaped Boluarte's later political identity, although the specific evidentiary basis for this interpretation is limited.

The Surquillo district office, where Boluarte was posted from approximately the mid-2000s, served a smaller and demographically more middle-class population — the Surquillo district had approximately 90,000 residents in the period, with a substantial portion in the lower-middle-class and middle-class strata. The Surquillo posting represented an institutional progression: a smaller but more procedurally-routine office where the senior-administrative responsibilities included supervision of junior staff, document-preparation review, and the institutional coordination with the central RENIEC offices.

5.3 Mid-Career Progression (2010–2018)

The mid-career RENIEC period saw Boluarte's progression through the institutional grades from junior-administrative-legal-services positions to middle-management positions. The post-2010 period also saw the implementation of the Carrera Pública Magisterial and the broader Servicio Civil (SERVIR) framework reforms — the post-2008 Decreto Legislativo No. 1023 established the Cuerpo de Gerentes Públicos and the post-2013 Ley No. 30057 Ley del Servicio Civil established the structured career-grade progression framework. RENIEC, as one of the more institutionally-capable agencies, implemented these frameworks relatively early; Boluarte's career-grade progression in the period followed the SERVIR framework requirements.

By approximately 2015–2018, Boluarte had reached a jefatura level — a middle-senior administrative position within the agency. The principal responsibilities at this level included supervision of district-office operations, coordination of inter-office work-flow, institutional representation in inter-agency working groups (in particular with the Ministerio de la Mujer y Poblaciones Vulnerables on civil-registration matters and with the Ministerio Público on legal-status-rectification cases), and the management of selected institutional projects. [TBD-VERIFY: the precise institutional grade of the jefatura and the specific RENIEC office or function corresponding to the position in the late 2010s are not fully reconstructed in the public record; the principal Wayka.pe and IDL-Reporteros reporting identifies a Jefatura de Oficina Registral level but the specific office assignment varies across the sources.]

The mid-career RENIEC period was characterised by professional routine, with limited public visibility and no significant political-controversy record. The post-2021 reporting has not identified any disciplinary proceedings, administrative-misconduct findings, or institutional-controversy episodes from the RENIEC period; the institutional record is one of unexceptional professional service.

5.4 The Late RENIEC Period (2018–2020) and the Outside-Activity Question

The late RENIEC period coincided with Boluarte's Perú Libre party affiliation and the 2020 Congressional candidacy. The Servicio Civil framework imposes constraints on outside political activity by RENIEC employees — the agency's constitutional-autonomy status requires institutional neutrality and limits partisan-political engagement by serving employees. Boluarte's Perú Libre affiliation, dated to approximately 2018, and her 2020 Congressional candidacy raised questions about compliance with these constraints; the post-2021 reporting has examined this question in some detail.

The principal reconstruction is that Boluarte obtained the required licencia sin goce de haber (unpaid administrative leave) during the formal candidacy period of the 26 January 2020 election, in compliance with the Servicio Civil framework, and returned to active RENIEC service after the unsuccessful candidacy. The 2021 Perú Libre presidential ticket candidacy was managed in parallel: Boluarte obtained the licencia for the formal candidacy period (the period from the official candidacy registration in February 2021 through the 6 June 2021 second-round and the subsequent JNE proclamación on 19 July 2021). The institutional separation between Boluarte's RENIEC working life and her Perú Libre political engagement was thus formally maintained, although the post-2021 reporting has documented selected informal-channel contacts that were the subject of subsequent disciplinary inquiry. [TBD-VERIFY: the RENIEC internal disciplinary proceedings related to Boluarte's outside-political-activity in the 2018–2021 period are documented in the post-2021 reporting but have not been comprehensively reconstructed in the public record; the principal finding was that no formal disciplinary sanction was imposed during the relevant period.]

The 28 July 2021 Vice-Presidential inauguration formally ended Boluarte's RENIEC service. The eighteen-year-and-some-months tenure was the principal professional formation of her working life — longer than her university period, longer than her notarial-and-paralegal period, and constitutive of the funcionaria pública identity that the 2021 candidacy invoked. The post-2022 contestation over Boluarte's significance has occasionally invoked the RENIEC tenure in incompatible ways — as evidence of legitimate technocratic-administrative experience suited to the demands of the Presidency, or as evidence of an inexperienced and politically-naive figure ill-suited to the post-Castillo institutional challenges.

---

6. The Perú Libre Entry, the 2020 Congressional Run, and the 2021 Vice-Presidential Candidacy

6.1 The Perú Libre Party — Origins and the Cerrón Lineage

The Partido Político Nacional Perú Libre — the political party that would carry Boluarte to the Vice Presidency in 2021 and to the Presidency in 2022 — was founded as a regional political organisation in the department of Junín in approximately 2007 by Vladimir Cerrón Rojas (a Cuban-trained physician who served as regional governor of Junín for two terms) and a small group of Andean-Marxist-and-progressive-Catholic collaborators. The party operated as a regional vehicle through the late 2000s and early 2010s, gradually expanding its network through the Andean sierra and consolidating as a national party with the post-2016 Registro de Organizaciones Políticas registration. The party's programmatic identity combined Andean-regionalist concerns, mining-community-rights advocacy, education-sector trade-union alliances (in particular with selected SUTEP regional sections including the Patria Roja-aligned currents), and a left-of-centre national programmatic posture.

The party's principal national-political moment, before the 2021 election, was the Cerrón gubernatorial period (Junín 2007–2010 and 2014–2018). The 2018 conviction of Cerrón in the Caso Antalsis corruption case — for which he received a sentence of forty-two months suspended, and which under the post-2019 Ley de Organizaciones Políticas framework would render him ineligible for executive-elective office — was the structural event that necessitated the Perú Libre delegation of the 2021 presidential candidacy to an external figure. The party's leadership engaged in an extended process during 2020 of identifying a presidential candidate who could carry the Perú Libre identity and the Cerrón-faction political project without himself being institutionally ineligible. Pedro Castillo, the Tacabamba rural-teacher and huelga magisterial figure (PE-H-PRES-06), was the eventual selection.

6.2 Boluarte's Perú Libre Affiliation

Boluarte's formal affiliation with Perú Libre dated to approximately 2018, although the precise circumstances of her entry into the party are incompletely documented in the public record. The principal reconstruction is that Boluarte was recruited through the party's Lima-and-southern-Andean-network expansion of the late 2010s, with her Apurímac-origin biographical positioning and her RENIEC-civil-servant professional positioning being attractive features for a party seeking to build a credible national candidate-and-affiliate roster beyond the Junín-centred core. The relationship between Boluarte and the Cerrón faction in the 2018–2020 period was reportedly cordial-but-not-deeply-embedded; she was not a member of the party's Comité Ejecutivo Nacional or of any of the principal-internal-power structures, but a affiliated militante whose presence in the party's national roster served the party's geographical-and-professional balance.

The 26 January 2020 Congressional election — held after President Vizcarra's 30 September 2019 dissolution of Congress (PE-C-01) and the formal call of extraordinary elections for the residual congressional term — saw Boluarte registered on the Perú Libre Congressional list for Lima. The party's overall national result was modest: Perú Libre did not exceed the 5 per cent threshold required for proportional Congressional representation and obtained no seats in the resulting Congress. Boluarte's individual vote within the Lima list was minimal, and she did not win a seat. The 2020 Congressional candidacy thus produced no institutional outcome, but it served the procedural purpose of establishing her formal candidacy record within the party — a record that would become relevant in the subsequent 2021 ticket selection.

6.3 The 2021 Ticket Selection

The selection of Boluarte as Castillo's primera vicepresidenta on the 2021 Perú Libre presidential ticket was a result of the party's internal-balancing requirements rather than of any extensive prior personal relationship between Castillo and Boluarte. The principal balancing requirements identified by the party leadership were: (i) an Andean-coastal balance (Castillo from the northern Cajamarca sierra, Boluarte from the southern Apurímac sierra, providing a southern-Andean complement to Castillo's northern-Andean origin); (ii) a gender balance (Castillo male, Boluarte female, addressing both the constitutional preference for gender-balanced tickets and the party's progressive-programmatic commitments); (iii) a professional-credential balance (Castillo a primary-school teacher and rondero, Boluarte a UNMSM-credentialled abogada and senior funcionaria pública, providing technocratic-administrative credentials to complement Castillo's rural-popular profile); and (iv) a regional-organisational balance (Castillo from the SUTEP-CONARE-Magisterial network, Boluarte from the Perú Libre affiliated-roster network, ensuring representation of multiple party-internal currents).

The segunda vicepresidencia on the ticket was held by Vladimir Cerrón [TBD-VERIFY: the precise composition of the 2021 Perú Libre presidential ticket as registered with the JNE is partially incomplete in the public record; the principal reconstruction is that Cerrón was the segundo vicepresidente candidate, although alternative reconstructions place him in a non-ticket-position senior party role given the post-2018 ineligibility question]. The formal registration of the ticket with the JNE occurred in early 2021 under the post-2019 Ley de Organizaciones Políticas framework.

6.4 The April 2021 First Round and the June 2021 Second Round

The 11 April 2021 first-round election produced the surprise of the post-2000 Peruvian electoral cycle. Perú Libre, polling at 2–3 per cent through early 2021, surged in the final pre-election weeks to a first-place finish with 18.92 per cent of the valid vote — a 5-percentage-point lead over the second-place Keiko Fujimori (Fuerza Popular, 13.41 per cent). The geographic distribution of the Perú Libre first-round vote was concentrated in the southern Andean trapecio (Apurímac 38.3 per cent, Ayacucho 35.2, Huancavelica 40.6, Cusco 29.1, Puno 37.7) and in adjacent rural-Andean departments; the coastal-urban and northern departments produced sub-10 per cent shares.

The 6 June 2021 second-round election against Keiko Fujimori was the most contested second-round in the post-2000 Peruvian electoral period. The final certified result, after the JNE's processing of the post-election tachas en bloque through 19 July 2021, was Castillo 50.13 per cent (8,835,579 votes) to Fujimori 49.87 per cent (8,791,521 votes) — a margin of 44,058 votes out of 18,827,792 ballots cast. Boluarte's profile during the second-round campaign was that of a relatively low-key running-mate — she participated in selected campaign events, delivered selected regional addresses, and represented the ticket in selected media engagements, but the principal campaign visibility was Castillo's. The post-election institutional contestation cycle — Keiko Fujimori's tachas petitions, the international electoral-observation-mission certifications, and the eventual JNE Resolución No. 0827-2021-JNE of 19 July 2021 proclamando the ticket — is documented in detail in PE-H-PRES-06 and PE-D-01.

6.5 The Pre-Inauguration Period (19–28 July 2021)

The nine days between the JNE proclamación of 19 July 2021 and the 28 July 2021 inauguration were the principal cabinet-and-transition-planning period for the incoming Castillo-Boluarte administration. The transition was institutionally underprepared: the Perú Libre party had limited prior governing experience at the national level, the Castillo personal network was rooted in the Cajamarca SUTEP environment with limited Lima-political-network access, and the Cerrón faction's preferred cabinet appointees were the subject of internal-party-and-coalition negotiation. The pre-inauguration period therefore produced a cabinet that was finalised in its details only in the immediate days before the 30 July 2021 swearing-in.

Boluarte's role in the pre-inauguration period was twofold: as Vice-President-elect, she participated in the transition meetings with the outgoing Sagasti administration and with the principal institutional counterparts (the JNE, the ONPE, the Tribunal Constitucional, the BCRP); and as the designated Minister of Development and Social Inclusion (the MIDIS portfolio having been allocated to her in the cabinet negotiations), she began the policy-and-personnel-planning for the MIDIS administration. The dual role — Vice President and senior cabinet minister — was constitutionally permitted under Article 124 of the 1993 Constitution but produced a substantial workload concentration that would characterise her first sixteen months in office.

---

7. The Vice Presidency and the MIDIS Portfolio (28 July 2021 – 25 November 2022)

7.1 The 28 July 2021 Inauguration

The 28 July 2021 inauguration of the Castillo–Boluarte administration coincided with the bicentennial of Peruvian independence. The principal ceremony at the Hemiciclo of the Congress of the Republic, attended by the international delegations documented in PE-H-PRES-06 §1 (Mexican President López Obrador, Bolivian President Arce, Chilean President Piñera, Colombian President Duque, US Secretary of Commerce Raimondo, and others), saw the formal swearing-in of Castillo as President, Boluarte as First Vice President, and the segundo vicepresidente in turn. Boluarte wore a formal dress in colores patrios (the red-and-white of the Peruvian flag); her brief inaugural remarks at the post-ceremony reception emphasised her commitment to the social-inclusion agenda and to the representation of the Andean-and-rural-Peruvian constituencies.

The bicentennial-period symbolic content of the inauguration was substantial. Castillo's rural-Andean-schoolteacher profile and Boluarte's Andean-origin civil-servant profile were widely characterised in the international and domestic reporting as the symbolic representation of a long-marginalised Andean constituency reaching the apex of the Peruvian state. The policy commitments of the inauguration, however, were limited: the formal inaugural address committed the administration to a Constituent Assembly process, to a centre-left programmatic agenda emphasising rural development and mining-community rights, to continuity of the existing Pacific-trade-and-Pacific-Alliance architecture, and to an anti-corruption operating standard. The gap between symbolic and content would become the defining tension of the administration.

7.2 The MIDIS Portfolio — Structure and Operations

The Ministerio de Desarrollo e Inclusión Social — created under Ley No. 29792 of 20 October 2011 by the Humala administration (PE-B-01) — is the Peruvian state's principal social-protection coordination agency. The portfolio encompasses five principal programmes: Pensión 65, the non-contributory rural elderly-pension programme covering the age-65-and-above poor population in the rural Andean and Amazon regions; Juntos, the conditional-cash-transfer programme for poor households with school-age children and pregnant women; Cuna Más, the early-childhood-development programme for children under three years; FONIE, the Fondo para la Inclusión Económica en Zonas Rurales infrastructure-and-services fund; and Qali Warma, the school-feeding programme covering public-school students in the urban and rural primary sector. The portfolio also coordinates inter-sectoral social-inclusion policy through the Sistema Nacional de Desarrollo e Inclusión Social (SINADIS) framework.

The MIDIS budget in the 2021–2022 fiscal years was approximately S/. 6 billion (approximately US$1.5 billion) — a substantial but not enormous portfolio in the Peruvian central-government budget context. The institutional capacity of the agency was moderate — significantly better than the lower-functioning agencies of the Peruvian state but below the institutional capacity of the BCRP, the MEF, or the principal extractive-sector regulators. The principal MIDIS challenges in the Boluarte period were the post-pandemic poverty-rebound (Peruvian poverty rates had risen from 20.2 per cent in 2019 to 30.1 per cent in 2020 and remained elevated through 2021), the operational management of Qali Warma under the post-pandemic school-reopening conditions, and the coordination with the Ministerio de Salud on the post-pandemic social-protection-and-health-system articulation.

7.3 Boluarte's MIDIS Tenure — Record and Assessment

Boluarte's MIDIS tenure, from 28 July 2021 through 25 November 2022, was approximately sixteen months. The principal initiatives of the tenure included a Pensión 65 coverage expansion (with the addition of approximately 100,000 new beneficiaries through 2021–2022, against a baseline of approximately 600,000 beneficiaries at the start of the period); a Juntos programme-targeting refinement to address the post-pandemic poverty-rebound demographics; the implementation of the Qali Warma school-reopening protocols; and the launch of selected pilot programmes in the inter-sectoral social-inclusion coordination framework. The administrative record was unexceptional within the post-2011 trajectory of the portfolio — no major scandal, no systematic policy-implementation failure, and no significant institutional-controversy episode emerged from the MIDIS period.

The political profile of Boluarte within the cabinet was relatively low. She was not a principal-circle member of the Castillo personal network (which centred on the Cajamarca SUTEP connections and on selected Lima political-and-legal advisers), nor of the Cerrón faction's preferred-cabinet-appointees circle. The principal political-positioning of Boluarte during the Vice Presidency was as the constitutional successor — the Article 115 successor in the event of the Castillo vacancia or renuncia — and her low-key cabinet profile was, in part, a strategic positioning to preserve her availability for the succession scenario that the deepening Castillo–Congressional conflict was making increasingly probable through 2022.

7.4 The Castillo–Cerrón Rupture and Boluarte's Positioning

The Castillo–Cerrón internal Perú Libre rupture consolidated through the late 2021 and through 2022. The principal dimensions of the rupture were ideological (Castillo's gradual centre-ward drift in selected economic and foreign-policy positions versus Cerrón's commitment to the Andean-Marxist programmatic line), personnel (Castillo's progressive non-appointment of Cerrón-faction preferred figures to senior cabinet positions), and institutional (Castillo's effective political departure from the Cerrón faction's party-internal leadership architecture). By mid-2022, Castillo had effectively departed from the Perú Libre party-internal structure while retaining the formal party affiliation; by November 2022, the relationship was characterised by Peruvian commentary as a de facto break with continuing de jure party affiliation.

Boluarte's positioning in this rupture was characterised by a gradual public-distancing from Perú Libre without a clean party-affiliation break. The principal public-distancing moments included her January 2022 statement that she "did not agree with selected positions of the party leadership", her March 2022 statement that "my commitment is to the country, not to a party leadership", and her September 2022 statement reiterating her institutional-rather-than-partisan loyalty. The public-distancing trajectory positioned Boluarte as a politically-independent successor candidate within the cabinet — a positioning that the post-7-December-2022 commentary would interpret in incompatible ways (as evidence of legitimate institutional-conscience departure from a party leadership engaged in autogolpe preparation, or as evidence of pre-meditated successor-positioning that anticipated and possibly facilitated the Castillo removal).

7.5 The 25 November 2022 MIDIS Departure

Boluarte's departure from MIDIS on 25 November 2022 — twelve days before the 7 December autogolpe — was the immediate-precursor cabinet event to the constitutional succession. The departure was formally a renuncia (resignation) from the MIDIS portfolio, with the cargo assumed by Aníbal Torres (in his concurrent capacity as Prime Minister, before the 25 November transition to Betssy Chávez as Prime Minister). The departure permitted Boluarte to focus exclusively on the Vice-Presidential role during the final phase of the Castillo vacancia-threat trajectory; the deepening Congressional-coalition vote-counting indicated that a December 2022 vacancia motion was increasingly likely to succeed, and the constitutional-succession architecture required the Vice President to be free of the cabinet-portfolio conflict-of-interest.

The post-7-December commentary has examined the timing of the 25 November departure for evidence of pre-meditated coordination with the Congressional coalition that would subsequently advance the vacancia. The principal reconstruction is that there was no documented direct coordination — Boluarte continued to publicly support Castillo through the period until the 7 December Mensaje itself, and her public statements through the 25 November–7 December period maintained the institutional-loyalty framing. The post-7-December conspiratorial reading (advanced by selected Castillo-coalition commentary) holds that the timing was nonetheless structurally indicative of a constitutional-succession positioning that anticipated and facilitated the Castillo removal. The corpus treats the conspiratorial reading as unsubstantiated by the available record but notes that the timing question is one of the recurring features of the post-7-December contestation.

The 7 December 2022 morning saw Boluarte at the Government Palace in her Vice-Presidential capacity, in advance of the scheduled Congressional vacancia vote that day. The constitutional-succession sequence that followed — the Castillo Mensaje a la Nación at approximately 11:42, the immediate institutional rejection by the Tribunal Constitucional and the Fiscalía, the same-day cabinet resignations, the 101–6–10 Congressional vote, and Boluarte's swearing-in at approximately 15:00 — is documented in detail in PE-D-02 and the broader institutional-event documentation. The biographical focus of this document is on the post-15:00 Boluarte Presidency and the trajectory through 2023–2026.

---

8. The 7 December 2022 Succession — Constitutional Procedure and the First Hours

8.1 The Constitutional Sequence

The 7 December 2022 constitutional succession of Boluarte to the Presidency followed the sequence documented in detail in PE-D-02. The Castillo Mensaje a la Nación at approximately 11:42 announced the dissolution of Congress, the establishment of a gobierno de excepción, the convocation of a Constituent Congress, the reorganisation of the judiciary, and the imposition of an immediate curfew. The institutional rejection sequence — the Tribunal Constitucional emergency resolution finding the Mensaje unconstitutional, the Fiscalía's detention order for Castillo on charges of rebelión, the same-day mass cabinet resignations, the Armed Forces and National Police statements refusing to enforce the announced dissolution and curfew, and the convening of the Congressional emergency session — proceeded across the morning and early afternoon. The Congressional vote on the vacancia motion (the third vacancia motion of the Castillo presidency, the first two having failed in December 2021 and 28 March 2022) commenced at approximately 14:00 and concluded with 101 votes in favour, 6 against, and 10 abstentions — comfortably exceeding the 87-vote two-thirds threshold required under Article 113.2 of the 1993 Constitution.

The constitutional succession proceeded under Article 115 of the 1993 Constitution, which establishes that the First Vice President assumes the Presidency in the event of the vacancia or renuncia of the President. Boluarte was sworn in by the President of Congress, José Williams Zapata, in the Hemiciclo of the Congress of the Republic at approximately 15:00, becoming the 69th President of Peru and the first woman to hold the office. The swearing-in ceremony was televised live on the principal Peruvian channels (TV Perú, Canal N, América Televisión, and others) and broadcast internationally through Reuters, AP, and BBC wire-and-broadcast services.

8.2 The Inaugural Address

Boluarte's brief inaugural address — approximately fifteen minutes in length, delivered in Spanish from the speaker's lectern of the Hemiciclo — committed her to several principles: "respect for the rule of law and democratic institutions"; "a process of national dialogue" aimed at the principal social-and-political tensions exposed by the Castillo crisis; "a gobierno de amplia base" (broad-based government) that would seek institutional cooperation with the Congress, the judiciary, and the principal civil-society and church-mediated dialogue spaces; "the continuation of the Constitutional term to 28 July 2026" (subject to subsequent revision if the Congress and the constitutional-reform mechanisms produced an alternative); and "respect for the multilateral architecture and Peru's international commitments". The address did not commit to advanced elections, to a Constituent Assembly process, or to a comprehensive accountability framework for the events of the preceding hours.

The brevity and limited specificity of the inaugural address reflected both the urgent-improvised character of the transition and the strategic decision to avoid commitments that would later constrain the cabinet-and-policy planning. The address was delivered without the standard ceremonial preparation that would characterise a regular inaugural — no formal Mensaje a la Nación preparation, no extensive cabinet pre-coordination, and no detailed policy-platform articulation. The institutional-improvisational character of the address was a reading reproduced across the post-7-December commentary.

8.3 The First Hours — Cabinet Formation and the Initial Protest Response

The first hours of the Boluarte Presidency were dominated by two parallel processes: the cabinet formation and the initial protest response. The cabinet formation proceeded through the evening of 7 December and the morning of 8 December, with extensive consultations between Boluarte, her immediate political advisers, and the principal Congressional bloc leaders. The first cabinet, under Pedro Angulo Arana as Prime Minister, was sworn in on 10 December 2022 — three days after the succession — and reflected a transitional-coalition character with figures drawn from a range of institutional-and-political backgrounds.

The initial protest response was managed in the first hours through the existing institutional architecture — the National Police's standard public-order framework, the Armed Forces' coordination structures, and the Defensoría del Pueblo's monitoring activities. The first protest mobilisations in the southern Andean regions commenced on 8 December 2022; the first protest-related deaths occurred on 11 December 2022 in Andahuaylas, Apurímac. The institutional escalation through the estado de emergencia framework — DS No. 143-2022-PCM on 14 December 2022 (national) and DS No. 009-2023-PCM on 14 January 2023 (Lima, Callao, Cusco, Puno) — would follow within the first ten days. The biographical focus of this section is on Boluarte's decision-making in the first hours; the protest-cycle documentation is in PE-D-03.

8.4 The Legitimacy Contestation of the Succession

The legitimacy of the Boluarte succession was contested in two distinct registers from the first hours. The first register was the formal-constitutional: the Article 115 succession was procedurally regular under the 1993 Constitution, and the principal institutional actors (the Tribunal Constitucional, the Fiscalía, the Armed Forces, the National Police, the international electoral-observation missions that engaged with the post-succession period, and the principal foreign-governmental recognitions) treated the succession as constitutionally legitimate. The second register was the political-: the Castillo-coalition and significant segments of the Andean-rural opposition contested the political legitimacy of the succession on the grounds that Boluarte had been elected as Castillo's running-mate, that she had no independent electoral mandate of her own, that her gradual public-distancing from Perú Libre during the Vice Presidency had not amounted to a clean break, and that the succession produced a President aligned with the Congressional coalition that had just removed her ticket-mate.

The two-register contestation has structured the subsequent contestation over the Boluarte Presidency. The formal-constitutional legitimacy has remained essentially uncontested in the institutional-architecture sense; the political-legitimacy has remained contested throughout the period and has been the principal source of the sustained-low approval ratings that have characterised the Presidency. The corpus treats both registers as analytically valid and does not adjudicate between the formal-constitutional and political-readings; the contestation is one of the structural features of the post-2022 Peruvian political configuration.

---

9. The December 2022 – April 2023 Protest Cycle and the Comisión Multisectorial Record

9.1 The Cycle's Trajectory in Brief

The December 2022 – April 2023 protest cycle is documented in detail in PE-D-03. The biographical focus of this section is on Boluarte's decision-making during the cycle and on the institutional response architecture under her presidential authority. The cycle commenced within 48 hours of the 7 December succession, escalated through December 2022 with the first deaths in Andahuaylas (11–12 December), Ayacucho (15 December), and Virú (14 December), reached its deadliest single day on 9 January 2023 at the Juliaca airport (17 protesters killed), continued through the Toma de Lima phase in late January and February 2023, and gradually de-escalated through March and April 2023 as the principal regional frentes de defensa shifted to a longer-arc institutional-political strategy.

The cumulative casualty record, as summarised in §1, was the Comisión Multisectorial Informe Final figure of 67 cumulative deaths under its inclusion criteria; the Defensoría del Pueblo's case-by-case methodology produced 49 direct plus 11 protest-adjacent deaths; the IACHR May 2023 country report recorded approximately 60 deaths under its broader inclusion criteria. The geographic distribution mapped almost exactly onto Castillo's 2021 second-round electoral base (Apurímac, Ayacucho, Cusco, Puno, Huancavelica principally), the demographic profile of the dead was overwhelmingly young Quechua- and Aymara-speaking men with median age in the early twenties, and the forensic record (FAL 7.62 mm, AKM 7.62 mm, and AR-15 5.56 mm ammunition) established the cycle's character as a mass-casualty Andean-rural-and-indigenous event.

9.2 The Comisión Multisectorial — Mandate and Findings

The Comisión Multisectorial, created under Resolución Ministerial No. 0123-2023-PCM (approximately mid-2023, the precise date pending [TBD-VERIFY: the exact creation date of the Comisión Multisectorial varies across the post-2023 reporting; the principal reconstruction places it in March or April 2023, with the Informe Final published in approximately late 2023 or early 2024]), was the official Peruvian government body charged with the post-protest review. The mandate included the documentation of the cumulative death toll under specified inclusion criteria, the investigation of the institutional response chain (Armed Forces command, National Police command, and the political-decisional architecture under the PCM and the Presidency), and the formulation of recommendations for the post-cycle accountability framework.

The Comisión's Informe Final recorded 67 cumulative deaths under inclusion criteria that included direct protest-related deaths, deaths from injuries sustained during protest events, and selected protest-adjacent deaths (deaths during the estado de emergencia periods that occurred in close proximity to protest activity). The Comisión's methodology was relatively transparent and case-by-case; the principal points of methodological contestation with the Defensoría and the IACHR concerned the inclusion criteria for the protest-adjacent and indirect-cause deaths. The Comisión's recommendations included strengthened institutional-accountability mechanisms, revised use-of-force training for the Armed Forces and the National Police, and selected institutional-architecture reforms for the post-cycle accountability framework. The Boluarte government's response to the Comisión's recommendations has been partial implementation through selected administrative orders and revised training protocols; the principal institutional-architecture reforms have not been advanced through the Congress.

9.3 Boluarte's Decisional Role

Boluarte's decisional role in the protest-cycle response is the principal analytic-and-evidentiary question of the post-2022 contestation. The principal positions are: (i) the Boluarte-government position, which holds that the protest-response decisions were made through the standard institutional channels (the Comando Conjunto, the National Police command, the PCM under Otárola, and the relevant cabinet ministers) and that Boluarte's role was the standard presidential-oversight role rather than a direct-operational role; (ii) the IACHR-and-human-rights-coalition position, which holds that Boluarte, as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces under Article 167 of the 1993 Constitution, bears the constitutional-political responsibility for the operational decisions of the period, regardless of the specific decisional channels through which those decisions were taken; and (iii) the Andean-rural-opposition position, which holds that Boluarte personally authorised and supervised the operational decisions of the period and bears the direct responsibility for the deaths.

The empirical record on the specific decisional channels is partially documented. The principal Comando Conjunto operational decisions during the period were taken through the standard military-command channels, with cabinet-level coordination through the PCM and the Ministerio de Defensa; the principal National Police operational decisions were taken through the standard police-command channels, with cabinet-level coordination through the Ministerio del Interior. Boluarte's direct involvement was through the standard Consejo de Estado and Cabinet-meeting mechanisms, and through her direct communications with the PCM. [TBD-VERIFY: the precise content of Boluarte's direct communications with the PCM, the Comando Conjunto, and the National Police command during the period — including any specific operational-instruction communications — has been the subject of subsequent investigative interest but has not been comprehensively reconstructed in the public record; the principal Fiscalía investigations have sought the disclosure of these communications but the executive-branch privilege claims have constrained the disclosure trajectory.]

9.4 The IACHR Visita In Loco and the May 2023 Country Report

The IACHR visita in loco of January 2023 — an unusually rapid Commission visit by post-2000 standards — and the resulting May 2023 country report were the principal external-institutional engagements of the cycle. The report concluded that "extrajudicial executions" had occurred at Juliaca and at selected other incident sites, that the institutional response had been characterised by excessive use of force and by structural-discriminatory patterns against indigenous and Andean populations, and that the institutional-investigation architecture was deficient. The Boluarte government rejected the report formally through a Foreign Affairs note verbale and through public statements characterising the report as "biased" and as "interference".

The post-May-2023 IACHR engagement has continued through selected individual-petition cases (Juliaca, Ayacucho, Santisteban) that are anticipated to advance to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights through 2025–2027. The eventual Inter-American Court jurisprudential disposition will be one of the principal post-presidency accountability trajectories of the Boluarte period.

9.5 The Cycle's Effect on Boluarte's Presidency

The protest cycle's effect on the Boluarte Presidency was structural and enduring. The cycle established the legitimacy-deficit framing of the Presidency in the international and the principal domestic-academic-and-civil-society reading; the cycle established the geographic-and-demographic political map of the post-2022 Peruvian political contestation (the Lima/Andean cleavage in its most acute post-2000 form); the cycle structured the Inter-American human-rights engagement of the period; and the cycle anchored the principal political-and-prosecutorial-accountability question that would shape the Presidency through 2025 and into the post-presidency 2026 period. No subsequent event of the Boluarte Presidency — including the Caso Rolex disclosure of March 2024 and the Los Waykis investigation — has displaced the protest cycle as the constitutive political-historical event of the Presidency.

---

10. The Cabinet Trajectory — Angulo, Otárola, Adrianzén

10.1 The Three Prime Ministers — Overview

The Boluarte Presidency has passed through three Prime Ministers in the 2022–2026 period: Pedro Angulo Arana (10–21 December 2022, the 11-day transitional formation), Luis Alberto Otárola Peñaranda (21 December 2022 – 6 March 2024, the 14-month-and-14-day architectural cabinet), and Gustavo Adrianzén Olaya (6 March 2024 – ongoing as of mid-2026, the post-Rolex stabiliser). The detailed documentation of the cabinets is in PE-D-04; the biographical focus of this section is on Boluarte's personnel-management approach and on the political-strategic logic of the cabinet sequence.

10.2 Boluarte's Personnel-Management Approach

Boluarte's personnel-management approach has been characterised across the cabinet trajectory by three features. First, the preference for legally-credentialled and institutionally-experienced appointees rather than for political-network or party-affiliated appointees — a pattern reflecting her own RENIEC-civil-servant background and her institutional-rather-than-partisan self-positioning. The selection of Pedro Angulo (a legal academic and former Magistrate of the Tribunal Constitucional) for the initial PCM role, of Luis Otárola (a security-policy lawyer with prior cabinet experience) for the architectural PCM role, and of Gustavo Adrianzén (a career diplomat with prior OAS and Geneva representation experience) for the post-Rolex PCM role, reflects this preference.

Second, the use of cabinet rotation as a defensive personnel-management tool. The Otárola–Adrianzén transition on 6 March 2024, nine days before the Caso Rolex disclosure on 15 March, has been widely interpreted as a defensive personnel rotation in anticipation of a foreseeable institutional shock. The pattern of Interior Minister rotations through 2023–2025 (Vicente Romero, Víctor Torres, Walter Ortiz Acosta, Juan José Santivañez, Carlos Malaver, [TBD-VERIFY: the post-late-2024 sequence is incomplete in the public record]) reflects the cabinet-rotation pattern in the security-policy area where the institutional pressures have been most acute.

Third, the maintenance of selected continuity-figures across the cabinet trajectory. The principal continuity figures across the Angulo–Otárola–Adrianzén sequence include the BCRP Governor Julio Velarde Flores (re-appointed by Boluarte–Congress agreement in late 2024 for an extended term), the Foreign Affairs portfolio through Ana Cecilia Gervasi, Javier González-Olaechea, and Elmer Schialer (with Gervasi serving the early-cycle role and Schialer the post-October-2024 continuity role), and the institutional-coordination role of selected senior advisers and asesores in the Government Palace.

10.3 The Pre-2024 Cabinet — Otárola Tenure

The Otárola cabinet (21 December 2022 – 6 March 2024) was the architectural cabinet of the Boluarte presidency. The cabinet managed the most acute protest period, the IACHR visita in loco, the El Niño coastal flooding crisis of January–April 2023, the early macroeconomic recession of 2023, the September–December 2023 disinflation and BCRP rate-cut cycle, the Caso Yaziré Pinedo internal scandal of February–March 2024 that produced the Otárola resignation, and the inauguration of the bicameral-reform legislative process. The Otárola tenure was the longest-serving single PCM of the Boluarte presidency to date (subsequently exceeded by the Adrianzén tenure as of mid-2026).

The Boluarte–Otárola working relationship was reportedly close and operationally coordinated. Otárola's security-policy profile aligned with the Boluarte government's preferred protest-response framing (the "legitimate state authority against terrorist-aligned mobilisation" framing); the cabinet's external presentation through the protest period was structurally aligned with the Boluarte personal positioning. The Otárola resignation on 6 March 2024, triggered by the Caso Yaziré Pinedo leaked audio, was forced by media disclosure rather than by Congressional or institutional pressure, and Boluarte's public response (an Otárola acceptance-of-resignation statement that emphasised institutional gratitude rather than personal-political disavowal) preserved the working-relationship framing even as the institutional transition proceeded.

10.4 The Post-2024 Cabinet — Adrianzén Tenure

The Adrianzén cabinet (6 March 2024 – ongoing as of mid-2026) has been the post-Rolex stabilising cabinet of the Boluarte presidency. Gustavo Adrianzén Olaya — a former Permanent Representative of Peru to the OAS (2017–2018) and to the UN in Geneva (2021–2023), a career diplomat, and Boluarte's Minister of Justice and Human Rights through the prior period — was selected for diplomatic-and-legal credentials suited to managing the post-Rolex international and institutional environment. The cabinet's principal tasks have been the management of the Caso Rolex prosecutorial trajectory, the implementation of the bicameralism reform (Ley No. 32101 of 6 March 2024), the management of the 2024 security crisis (the post-Tren de Aragua organised-crime expansion), the management of the 2024–2025 macroeconomic recovery, and the pre-electoral architecture for the 12 April 2026 General Election.

The Boluarte–Adrianzén working relationship has been characterised by greater diplomatic-and-institutional-orientation than the Boluarte–Otárola relationship. The cabinet's external presentation through 2024–2025 has been less aggressively defensive than the Otárola cabinet's protest-period presentation; the principal external-presentation themes have included the rule-of-law-and-institutional-stability framing, the macroeconomic-recovery-and-investment-attraction framing, and the security-and-public-order framing (for the Tren de Aragua and related organised-crime questions).

---

11. The 15 March 2024 Caso Rolex and the Allanamiento

11.1 The Wayka.pe Investigation

The 15 March 2024 Wayka.pe investigation that disclosed President Boluarte's collection of high-value Rolex watches and other luxury items was published under the byline of journalist Gianella Tapullima and the Wayka investigative team. Wayka.pe is a Lima-based digital investigative outlet, founded in approximately 2019 by a group of journalists associated with the post-2018 reconfiguration of Peruvian investigative journalism, that has become one of the principal investigative sources on post-2022 Peruvian political-corruption questions. The investigation documented at least eleven Rolex watches and additional Cartier and Bulgari items in Boluarte's possession that had not been declared in her Declaración Jurada before the SUNAT and the Contraloría.

The cumulative estimated retail value of the disclosed items was [TBD-VERIFY: approximately US$500,000 across the disclosed items, with individual-piece valuations ranging from approximately US$14,000 to over US$40,000; the Wayka.pe valuations were based on standard retail-market price ranges for the identified models, and the Fiscalía's own comprehensive valuation report has not been fully released as of the document's writing date]. The principal items identified in the Wayka.pe disclosure included multiple Rolex Daytona, Datejust, and other model variants; selected Cartier Panthère and Tank watches; and selected Bulgari Serpenti and B.zero1 items.

11.2 The Declaración Jurada Question

The Declaración Jurada de Intereses — the assets-and-interests declaration required of high-level Peruvian state officials under Ley No. 27482 of 2001 and subsequent updates — is filed annually with the SUNAT and the Contraloría and is, in principle, subject to public disclosure. Boluarte's Declaración Jurada filings during the 2021–2024 period did not include the disclosed Rolex, Cartier, and Bulgari items; the Wayka.pe investigation's principal evidentiary contribution was the documentation of the discrepancy between the Declaración Jurada record and the photographic-and-eyewitness record of the items in Boluarte's possession.

Boluarte's initial public response to the disclosure — a 17 March 2024 press conference at the Government Palace — characterised the principal disclosed Rolex as "a loan from a friend" (subsequently identified as Wilfredo Oscorima, the regional governor of Ayacucho), and characterised the other disclosed items as either personal items predating the Declaración Jurada filing requirement or as items that had been incorrectly omitted from the filing through administrative error. The "loan from a friend" framing — and the identification of Oscorima, the Ayacucho regional governor who had been a key political-coalition partner of the Boluarte–Otárola government during the protest period and after — became the principal contested element of the post-disclosure cycle.

11.3 The 22 March 2024 Allanamiento

On 22 March 2024 the Fiscalía under interim Fiscal de la Nación Juan Carlos Villena, supported by the Policía Nacional, executed a judicially-authorised allanamiento (search) of Boluarte's personal residence in Surquillo (Lima) and her office at the Palacio de Gobierno. The allanamiento was authorised by the Juzgado Supremo de Investigación Preparatoria and proceeded under the Código Procesal Penal framework; the search lasted approximately eight hours and produced the seizure of selected items for evidentiary review. The allanamiento of a sitting Peruvian president's residence was the first such operation in the modern democratic period; the principal precedents in the broader Peruvian-political-corruption record (the Toledo, Humala, and Kuczynski cases) involved post-presidency rather than during-presidency searches.

The institutional significance of the allanamiento was substantial. The operation established that the constitutional-immunity framework under Article 117 of the 1993 Constitution (which limits the prosecutorial actions against a sitting President to a defined set of grave offences) did not prevent the executive of search-and-evidentiary-collection actions in the Caso Rolex context. The Boluarte government's response to the allanamiento was a combination of public criticism (characterising the operation as politically-motivated and as institutionally-inappropriate) and procedural cooperation (with no documented obstruction of the operation itself). The allanamiento was the principal escalation event of the Caso Rolex prosecutorial trajectory.

11.4 The Subcomisión de Acusaciones Constitucionales Process

The constitutional-accusation process advanced into the Subcomisión de Acusaciones Constitucionales del Congreso following the Caso Rolex disclosure and the allanamiento. The Subcomisión — the Congressional subcommittee responsible for the formal-accusation process against high-level officials under Article 99 of the 1993 Constitution — received the Caso Rolex file in late March 2024 and conducted preliminary review through 2024. The principal procedural question was whether the Caso Rolex allegations rose to the constitutional-accusation threshold and whether the case should advance to the Comisión Permanente and ultimately to a plenary vacancia vote.

The post-2022 protective Congressional coalition's voting arithmetic — Fuerza Popular, Alianza para el Progreso, Acción Popular, Renovación Popular, Avanza País, plus rotating support from Somos Perú and Podemos Perú — was insufficient to advance the case past the Subcomisión stage in the form that would produce a vacancia vote. The Subcomisión processing through 2024–2025 has been characterised by procedural delays, partial-document-request procedures, and selected witness testimonies, but has not produced a formal accusation. The principal constitutional-accusation route for the Caso Rolex has therefore been effectively suspended for the duration of the Presidency, with the prosecutorial action deferred to the post-28-July-2026 post-presidency period.

---

12. Los Waykis en la Sombra and the 2024–2025 Prosecutorial Architecture

12.1 The Los Waykis Investigation

The Los Waykis en la Sombra investigation is the name given by the Fiscalía to the broader Boluarte-circle corruption-and-influence-trafficking case file that emerged from the post-Rolex enlargement of the principal carpeta fiscal. The name Los Waykis (the Quechua word for "brothers" or "comrades") refers to the alleged network of family members, RENIEC-period colleagues, and post-2021 political-and-administrative figures who, in the prosecutorial hypothesis, served as intermediaries for selected favours, contractual arrangements, and influence-trafficking operations during the Boluarte presidency.

The principal figure named in the public-record reporting is Boluarte's brother, Nicanor Boluarte Zegarra, who has been investigated for his alleged role in the parallel sub-case Caso Los Hijos del Cóndor — concerning the alleged use of the presidential apparatus to influence regional-level contracting and prefectoral appointments. Other figures implicated in the Los Waykis investigation include selected RENIEC-period colleagues of the President who were appointed to public-sector positions after July 2021, selected post-2022 cabinet figures whose appointments and operational decisions are alleged to have benefited from Los Waykis-mediated influence, and selected regional-government figures (in particular in the Ayacucho, Apurímac, and adjacent Andean regional governments) whose contractual arrangements and federal-coordination decisions are alleged to have been affected by Los Waykis intermediation.

12.2 The Procedural Status

[TBD-VERIFY: the Los Waykis case is at the investigación preparatoria stage as of mid-2026; the formal accusation has not been filed by the Fiscalía and the specific charge inventory remains provisional; the principal charges under prosecutorial review include tráfico de influencias (Article 400 of the Penal Code), colusión (Article 384), peculado (Articles 387 and 389), and organización criminal (Article 317), with the precise charge inventory dependent on the eventual formal-accusation filing.] The Fiscalía's investigative-coordination structure has placed the Los Waykis investigation under a fiscal supraprovincial with national jurisdiction; the principal investigative coordination has been with the Equipo Especial Lava Jato (the special prosecutorial unit established for the Odebrecht-related cases and subsequently expanded for the post-2022 corruption-investigation portfolio) and with the Procuraduría Pública Anticorrupción (the state's principal civil-action representative in the post-2018 anti-corruption architecture).

12.3 The 2024 Junta Nacional de Justicia – Tribunal Constitucional Dispute

The 2024 prosecutorial-architecture contest — centred on the Junta Nacional de Justicia's 27 May 2024 removal of Patricia Benavides as Fiscal de la Nación on disciplinary grounds, the Tribunal Constitucional's 21 August 2024 auto ordering her provisional restoration, the parallel emergence of Delia Espinoza as the institutional caretaker, and the eventual Benavides restoration — was the most-consequential institutional-prosecutorial dispute since the Fujimori-era CNM crisis (PE-A-01). The dispute is documented in detail in PE-D-04.

The biographical relevance to Boluarte is that the Benavides Fiscalía was the institutional channel through which the Castillo preliminary-detention order of 7 December 2022 had been issued, and through which selected post-2022 prosecutorial actions had advanced; the Benavides-versus-JNJ dispute therefore implicated the institutional-prosecutorial architecture within which the Caso Rolex and Los Waykis investigations would proceed. The Boluarte–Congress majority characterised the Tribunal Constitucional's August 2024 intervention as a constitutional correction; the JNJ, the IDEHPUCP, and the principal academic commentary characterised it as institutional overreach. The dispute's resolution is one of the structural questions of the post-2022 Peruvian institutional configuration.

12.4 The Post-Presidency Prosecutorial Outlook

The post-presidency prosecutorial outlook for Boluarte — anticipated from 28 July 2026, when the constitutional-immunity protections of Article 117 cease to apply — includes the principal expected case-flow on the Caso Rolex, the Los Waykis investigation, and selected protest-period casualty cases. The principal procedural sequence in the post-presidency period is expected to follow the pattern of the post-Kuczynski (2018), post-Toledo (2014, then 2022 extradition), post-Humala (2017), and post-Castillo (2022) cases: an initial carpeta fiscal formalisation, a prisión preventiva request and judicial decision, an extended investigative phase, an eventual formal accusation, and (in the cases that have advanced through to trial) a multi-year trial sequence.

The eventual disposition of the prosecutorial trajectory will depend on multiple factors that cannot be predicted from the mid-2026 position: the post-2026 Fiscalía leadership (which will be affected by the post-2026 Junta Nacional de Justicia decisions on the Benavides–Espinoza-and-successor question); the post-2026 judicial leadership (in particular the composition of the Sala Penal Especial of the Corte Suprema that handles high-level cases); the post-2026 Congressional configuration (which under the restored bicameral framework will be elected on 12 April 2026); and the post-2026 institutional-and-international engagement on the protest-period casualty cases (in particular the anticipated Inter-American Court engagement on Juliaca, Ayacucho, and Santisteban).

---

13. The 2024–2025 Vacancia Survival and the Approval-Rating Floor

13.1 The Approval-Rating Trajectory

The Boluarte Presidency has been characterised by an unprecedented sustained-low approval rating across the polling record. The principal Peruvian polling series — the Instituto de Estudios Peruanos (IEP) monthly survey, the Ipsos Perú series, and the IPSOS-El Comercio series — have placed Boluarte's approval rating between 3 and 12 per cent for almost the entire period since mid-2023. The trajectory has been: an initial post-succession reading of approximately 30 per cent in December 2022 (reflecting the immediate-post-succession institutional-stability premium), a rapid decline through the protest cycle to approximately 15 per cent by April 2023, a further decline through 2023 to a 7–10 per cent range by late 2023, a brief stabilisation around 10–12 per cent in early 2024, a sharp decline to 3 per cent in April 2024 immediately after the Caso Rolex disclosure (the lowest single reading), a partial recovery to 6–8 per cent through mid-2024, and a sustained 5–8 per cent range through 2024–2025.

The 3 per cent April 2024 reading is one of the lowest sustained approval ratings recorded in the post-1980 Peruvian polling record. The historical comparators include the late-cycle Kuczynski approval ratings of 12–18 per cent in the months before his March 2018 resignation, the late-cycle Vizcarra approval ratings of 25–35 per cent in the months before his November 2020 vacancia (his ratings were notably higher than those of most predecessors), and the late-cycle García approval ratings (in his second presidency) of 20–25 per cent during 2010–2011. The Boluarte 3 per cent reading is therefore well below any post-1980 Peruvian presidential approval-rating floor.

13.2 The Congressional Approval-Rating Parallel

The Boluarte approval-rating floor has been mirrored by the Congressional approval-rating floor. The Congressional approval rating across 2023–2025 has been 3–7 per cent — even lower than the presidential rating in many polling cycles. The mutual-low-approval pattern is the structural feature of the post-2022 Peruvian political configuration; both the Presidency and the Congressional majority operate without positive popular legitimacy, and the political-survival of each rests on mutual non-removal rather than on positive electoral mandate.

The institutional name for the arrangement — la sociedad de la sobrevivencia (the survival partnership), coined by Vergara in El Comercio (October 2023) — has been adopted across the academic and commentary literature. The mechanics of the arrangement: the Congressional coalition does not advance a vacancia vote against Boluarte (which would require 87 of 130 deputies to succeed) because (i) the post-vacancia succession would produce an interim presidency under the Presidencia del Congreso arrangement that the Congressional bloc does not control to its advantage, and (ii) the post-vacancia political dynamic would likely produce a call for advanced elections that the Congressional bloc, with sustained-low approval ratings of its own, does not view favourably. Boluarte, in turn, does not advance institutional-reform measures that would weaken the Congressional bloc's protective architecture.

13.3 The Vacancia Threat Episodes

The 2023–2025 period has seen multiple vacancia threat episodes, none of which have advanced to a formal Congressional vote. The principal threat episodes include: the post-protest-period vacancia-threat moments of February–March 2023, when the IACHR engagement and the international-pressure environment combined with sustained domestic protest activity to produce a brief institutional-stress moment; the post-Otárola-resignation threat moment of March 2024, immediately followed by the Caso Rolex disclosure that further elevated the institutional-stress level; the Caso Rolex threat moment of March–June 2024, which produced the Subcomisión engagement but did not advance to a formal vacancia vote; and the periodic post-2024 threat moments associated with the 2024 security crisis and selected institutional-controversy episodes.

In each threat episode, the Congressional coalition's voting arithmetic has remained well short of the 87-vote threshold for vacancia. The principal voting-arithmetic features: Fuerza Popular's approximately 24 votes, Alianza para el Progreso's approximately 15, Acción Popular's approximately 16, Renovación Popular's approximately 13, Avanza País's approximately 8, and the supplementary support from Somos Perú and Podemos Perú of approximately 10 combined, producing a coalition floor of approximately 80–86 votes that has consistently exceeded the 65-vote majority required for non-vacancia protective actions but has not crossed the 87-vote vacancia threshold. The opposition — the Perú Libre (post-Castillo, depleted), the Bloque Magisterial, the Cambio Democrático – Juntos por el Perú, the post-Castillo regional independents, and the smaller progressive blocs — has held approximately 40 votes, well short of the vacancia requirement.

13.4 The Structural Reading

The structural reading of the vacancia survival is that the Boluarte Presidency has been institutionally protected by a Congressional configuration that itself rests on sustained-low approval. The arrangement is not based on positive popular legitimacy for either branch but on the absence of an institutional pathway through which either branch could remove the other without producing an unfavourable subsequent political dynamic for both. The institutional-survival pattern has been characterised by Vergara, Levitsky, Meléndez, Muñoz, and the broader academic literature as a structural-permanent-crisis pattern — a manifestation of the deeper post-2000 presidential-system instability that has produced five presidents in five years (Vizcarra, Merino, Sagasti, Castillo, Boluarte) before settling into the post-2022 mutual-survival configuration.

---

14. Three-Account Synthesis — Survival-and-Continuity, Legitimacy-Deficit, Structural-Permanent-Crisis

14.1 The Three-Account Frame

The post-2022 contestation over the Boluarte presidency has crystallised around three accounts that the corpus treats as analytically distinct, internally consistent, and individually-illuminating. The three accounts do not exhaust the interpretive space, and they overlap at multiple points; but they capture the principal interpretive positions in the international and domestic academic, civil-society, and political-commentary literature.

14.2 The Survival-and-Continuity Account

The survival-and-continuity account is held principally by the Boluarte–Adrianzén government, by the principal post-2022 Congressional bloc, by segments of the Lima business establishment, by selected international commentary (in particular from the IMF, the World Bank, and selected Pacific-Alliance-aligned governmental sources), and by selected academic commentary in the macroeconomic-stability and institutional-continuity tradition. The principal positions of the account are: (i) Peru avoided a constitutional collapse on and after 7 December 2022 — the post-Mensaje constitutional response was procedurally correct under the 1993 Constitution, the Article 115 succession was constitutionally regular, and the institutional architecture was preserved through the most acute moment of post-2000 presidential-system stress; (ii) the protest cycle, however tragic in its casualty record, was contained without recourse to broader-scale violence or to a generalised civil-conflict situation, and the institutional response, however contestable in its operational details, prevented the descent into a deeper institutional-and-social rupture; (iii) the macroeconomic recovery from the 2023 recession to the 2024 growth resumption and the 2025 acceleration has been delivered through standard institutional channels (BCRP, MEF, MEM), reflecting institutional-capacity continuity; and (iv) the bicameralism reform of Ley No. 32101 (6 March 2024) is the most-institutional renewal since the 1993 Constitution itself, addressing one of the principal structural weaknesses of the post-1993 political-architecture (the unicameral concentration of legislative power).

The account treats Boluarte as the constitutionally-legitimate, institutionally-conventional, and macroeconomically-effective successor to Castillo, with significant limitations (the protest casualties, the Caso Rolex allegations, the low approval ratings) acknowledged but framed as not constituting a fundamental challenge to the institutional-survival framing.

14.3 The Legitimacy-Deficit Account

The legitimacy-deficit account is held principally by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, by the Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos, by the IDEHPUCP, by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, by the Andean rural and indigenous opposition coalition, by much academic-Peruvian commentary in the human-rights-and-democratic-quality tradition, by the protestadores coalition organisations, and by selected international academic commentary in the human-rights-and-democratic-erosion tradition. The principal positions of the account are: (i) the Boluarte government lacks an independent electoral mandate — she was elected as Castillo's running-mate and on the Perú Libre programmatic platform, and her gradual distancing from Perú Libre during the Vice Presidency did not produce a clean break that would establish an independent political-identity foundation; (ii) the protest-period casualties remain without accountability — the principal command-line responsibility, despite the Comisión Multisectorial findings and the IACHR May 2023 country report, has not been institutionally established through the Fiscalía or the judicial process, and the IACHR-anticipated case-flow to the Inter-American Court has not yet produced jurisprudential closure; (iii) the Caso Rolex reflects systemic personal-enrichment patterns characteristic of the post-2000 Peruvian presidential-corruption record, and the prosecutorial-architecture manipulation through the 2024 JNJ–Tribunal Constitucional dispute over Patricia Benavides constituted institutional capture of the prosecutorial-investigation framework; and (iv) the post-2022 Congressional coalition has advanced legislative measures (including the bicameralism reform and the prosecutorial-architecture reforms) that, in addition to their stated institutional-renewal purposes, serve protective political-interests of the coalition itself.

The account treats Boluarte as a constitutionally-formal but politically-illegitimate successor whose presidency has been characterised by structural human-rights failures, by personal-corruption allegations, and by institutional-capture dynamics — a presidency that, while procedurally regular under the 1993 Constitution, does not meet the legitimacy thresholds of post-Inter-American-Convention democratic governance.

14.4 The Structural-Permanent-Crisis Account

The structural-permanent-crisis account is held principally by Alberto Vergara, Steven Levitsky, Maxwell Cameron, Carlos Meléndez, Paula Muñoz, Cynthia McClintock, and the broader academic literature in the post-2000 Peruvian presidential-system instability tradition. The principal positions of the account are: (i) the Boluarte presidency is a manifestation rather than a cause of the deeper post-2000 presidential-system instability that has produced eleven presidents in twenty-five years (Toledo, García, Humala, Kuczynski, Vizcarra, Merino, Sagasti, Castillo, Boluarte, and the prospective post-2026 successor, plus the brief 2020 interim sequence) — the structural fact is that no single president has structurally stabilised the post-Fujimori presidential system; (ii) the principal structural drivers of the instability are the post-1993 unicameral-Congress design that concentrated legislative power without adequate balancing-bicameral architecture, the post-2000 party-system fragmentation that has produced unstable presidential-majority arithmetic, the post-Lava-Jato judicialisation of political competition that has produced the post-2018 prosecutorial-architecture contestation, and the structural Lima/Andean cleavage that the 2021–2023 cycle made systematically visible; (iii) the 2026 election under the restored bicameral framework will determine whether the post-Castillo–Boluarte trajectory ends or extends — the bicameralism reform may, over a longer horizon, produce institutional benefits, but the immediate political-arithmetic features of the post-2026 configuration are unlikely to resolve the underlying structural drivers; and (iv) the Boluarte presidency's significance lies less in its individual features (the Caso Rolex, the protest casualties, the cabinet rotations) than in its diagnostic value for understanding the deeper post-2000 Peruvian political reconfiguration.

The account treats Boluarte as one episode in a continuing structural-crisis sequence rather than as a distinct historical actor — a positioning that the academic literature has applied symmetrically to Castillo, to the post-2020 Vizcarra–Merino–Sagasti sequence, and to the prospective post-2026 successor.

14.5 The Corpus Position

The corpus does not arbitrate among the three accounts. Each is internally consistent, each captures a real feature of the post-2022 period, and each is held by a substantial scholarly-and-civil-society constituency with documented sources and reasoning. The biographical document of the Boluarte presidency must report each account fairly and must not, through implicit framing or selective citation, advance one account at the expense of the others. The corpus's discipline — analytical, source-grounded, historiographically honest — requires the parallel-account framing rather than a synthesised-and-arbitrated single-account framing. The eventual disposition of the contestation will be a function of the post-2026 institutional, prosecutorial, and electoral developments, none of which can be predicted from the mid-2026 position.

---

15. Forward View — The 2026 Election and the Post-Presidency Trajectory

15.1 The 12 April 2026 General Election

The 12 April 2026 General Election will be the principal post-Boluarte institutional event. Under the restored bicameral framework of Ley No. 32101 (6 March 2024), the election will simultaneously elect the President and Vice Presidents (with a second round in early June 2026 if no candidate exceeds 50 per cent of valid votes), the Chamber of Deputies (130 seats) under the post-reform composition, and the Senate (60 seats, new). The JNE Registro de Organizaciones Políticas (ROP) had accepted twenty-two presidential pre-candidacies as of the May 2025 cut-off, with the principal field documented in PE-D-04 §1 and PE-D-05.

Boluarte herself is not a candidate. The constitutional-and-electoral framework precludes immediate re-election under Article 112 of the 1993 Constitution (re-election after one term is permitted but not consecutive re-election), and the political-arithmetic features of the period make any Boluarte-aligned candidacy electorally non-viable given the sustained-low approval ratings. The principal Boluarte-period political legacy in the 2026 election will be the indirect effect of the protest cycle on the Andean-rural vote distribution, the indirect effect of the Caso Rolex and Los Waykis questions on the anti-corruption electoral discourse, and the bicameralism-reform institutional context within which the new Congress will operate.

15.2 The 28 July 2026 Constitutional-Immunity Lifting

The 28 July 2026 inauguration of the post-Boluarte presidential successor will produce, as its immediate institutional consequence, the lifting of the constitutional-immunity protections of Article 117 of the 1993 Constitution that have applied to Boluarte during her presidential tenure. The principal expected post-immunity prosecutorial sequence is documented in §12.4: the formalisation of the Caso Rolex and Los Waykis prosecutorial actions, the potential opening of selected protest-period casualty cases, and the eventual constitutional-accusation processes through the post-2026 Congress under the restored bicameral framework.

The specific procedural sequence in the post-presidency period will depend on the post-2026 institutional configuration: the post-2026 Fiscalía leadership, the post-2026 Junta Nacional de Justicia composition, the post-2026 Corte Suprema Sala Penal Especial composition, the post-2026 Congressional bicameral configuration, and the post-2026 institutional-and-international engagement on the principal cases. The eventual disposition cannot be predicted from the mid-2026 position; the principal comparators in the recent Peruvian record (the post-presidency Toledo, Humala, Kuczynski, and Castillo cases) suggest a multi-year procedural sequence that may extend well into the late 2020s and beyond.

15.3 The Three Open Questions

The forward view from the document's writing position (mid-2026) holds three principal open questions. First, whether Boluarte completes her constitutional term to 28 July 2026 — the vacancia threshold of 87 votes remains the principal institutional protection, the post-March-2024 Congressional configuration has shown no sustained indication of crossing it absent a further institutional rupture, and the principal pre-election months (April–July 2026) are likely to see continued mutual-survival logic rather than a late-term vacancia episode. Second, whether the 12 April 2026 General Election produces a successor President capable of constructing a working Congressional coalition in the restored bicameral system — the principal Pacific-Alliance-aligned and centre-right candidates (Keiko Fujimori, Rafael López Aliaga, Carlos Álvarez, Phillip Butters) face the structural-fragmentation arithmetic that has characterised the post-2000 first-round cycle, while the Andean-rural and centre-left candidates (Verónika Mendoza, Antauro Humala, Roberto Sánchez, the post-Castillo-coalition figures) face the post-2022 institutional-distrust arithmetic. Third, whether the post-presidency Boluarte trajectory — the eventual disposition of the Caso Rolex, Los Waykis en la Sombra, and the protest-period casualty cases — produces a prosecutorial sequence analogous to the post-Castillo, post-Toledo, and post-Kuczynski cases or whether the survival-partnership pattern produces a different outcome.

15.4 The Boluarte Biography as Diagnostic Document

The Boluarte biography, in the spirit of the Castillo biography that precedes it (PE-H-PRES-06), is not a closed history but the second central document of a continuing post-2022 Peruvian political reconfiguration. The Castillo and Boluarte biographies, paired together, constitute the principal biographical anchors of the post-2022 trajectory: Castillo as the rural-Andean-schoolteacher-president whose seventeen-month presidency culminated in the 7 December 2022 autogolpe attempt, Boluarte as the southern-Andean-civil-servant-Vice-President-who-became-President whose nearly-four-year presidency has been characterised by sustained-low approval, by the protest-period casualties, and by the Caso Rolex and Los Waykis corruption trajectories. The two biographies together — Cajamarca-northern-Andean-rural-teacher Castillo and Apurímac-southern-Andean-civil-servant Boluarte — illuminate the structural features of the post-2022 Peruvian political configuration in ways that no single biography could.

The diagnostic value of the biographies for understanding the deeper post-Fujimori Peruvian presidential-system instability is one of the principal contributions of the documents to the corpus. The post-2026 trajectory — whether it produces an institutional-stabilisation through the bicameral framework and the post-Boluarte successor, or whether it produces a continuation of the post-2000 instability pattern — will determine whether the Castillo–Boluarte pair represents an inflection point or a continuation. The biographical documents are therefore open-ended: the post-2026 developments will determine the eventual historiographical positioning of the pair, and the corpus's continuing-research-wave discipline will update the documents as the post-2026 sequence advances.

---

16. Postscript (Added 2026-08-29) — The Verified End of the Presidency: Removal on 10 October 2025

Section 15 above, written from a mid-2026 vantage point, treats Boluarte's completion of her constitutional term to 28 July 2026 as the more likely of two open scenarios, with removal via vacancia as the less-likely alternative. Verified reporting establishes that the alternative occurred: the Congress of the Republic removed Boluarte from the Presidency on 10 October 2025, roughly nine and a half months before the 28 July 2026 date §15.2 discusses, ending her presidency at 3 years, 10 months, and 3 days (25 November 2022 – 10 October 2025) rather than at the full remainder of Castillo's term.

The trigger. On 8 October 2025 a gunman opened fire during a concert by the cumbia band Agua Marina in Lima, injuring five people. Peruvian commentary read the attack as the culmination of a sustained wave of extortion-driven violence against musicians, transport operators, and small businesses rather than as an isolated incident; contemporaneous INEI figures cited in reporting recorded 6,041 homicides between January and mid-August 2025 (the highest for that period since 2017) and a 28 per cent year-on-year rise in extortion complaints (15,989 in January–July 2025) [TBD-VERIFY: pending primary-source fetch against INEI Estadísticas de Seguridad Ciudadana; search-corroborated via NPR and CBS News reporting of 10 October 2025].

The vote and mechanism. Congress accepted four pending moción de vacancia requests and convened an impeachment debate on the night of 9 October 2025; Boluarte was summoned to appear before midnight to defend herself but did not attend, and the 130-member unicameral Congress voted just after midnight on 10 October 2025 — reported at 124 in favour with no votes against — to remove her under Article 113 of the 1993 Constitution on grounds of "permanent moral incapacity" (the same constitutional mechanism, rather than the Article 117/antejuicio criminal-immunity route that Sections 11–13 above analyse in connection with the Caso Rolex and Los Waykis investigations). Boluarte thereby became the fifth Peruvian President removed via this mechanism, after Guillermo Billinghurst (1914), her own predecessor-but-one Alberto Fujimori (2000), Martín Vizcarra (2020), and Pedro Castillo (2022) — a lineage that places her, rather than a successor President, as the direct continuation of the vacancia-removal pattern this biography's §14 (structural-permanent-crisis reading) anticipated in general terms [TBD-VERIFY: pending primary-source fetch against the Congressional Resolución Legislativa; search-corroborated via NPR, Al Jazeera, Britannica, OPB, and CBS News reporting of 10 October 2025].

The succession and its sequel. José Enrique Jerí Oré, then President of Congress, was sworn in as interim President within hours to complete the remainder of Boluarte's constitutional term (Boluarte had no sitting Vice Presidents). Jerí was himself removed by Congress on 17–18 February 2026 (reported 75–24, 3 abstentions) over the "Chifagate" scandal — undisclosed December 2025/January 2026 meetings with two Chinese businessmen, one holding active state contracts and the other under investigation for illegal logging — and was succeeded by José María Balcázar, an 83-year-old former judge and Perú Libre affiliate, who governed until the 28 July 2026 inauguration of Keiko Fujimori [TBD-VERIFY: pending primary-source fetch; search-corroborated via JURIST, WLRN, PBS NewsHour, OPB, and NPR/Houston Public Media]. Boluarte's four-year-minus period in office was therefore followed by two further presidencies, not one, before the 2026 electoral cycle's winner took office — a detail with direct bearing on the "eleven presidents in twenty-five years" count in peru/CLAUDE.md's country frame, which this update suggests now undercounts the post-2022 sequence by at least two.

Post-removal legal status. Boluarte remained in Peru after leaving office; in mid-October 2025 a Peruvian judge rejected a prosecutorial request to bar her from leaving the country while investigations into alleged abuse of office and money laundering continued, alongside the pre-existing Caso Rolex inquiry into the origin of her undeclared luxury watches [TBD-VERIFY: pending primary-source fetch; search-corroborated via Al Jazeera, "Judge denies bid to block former President Dina Boluarte from leaving Peru," 15 October 2025, and Rio Times, "Dina Boluarte Shielded for Now, But History Points to Prison"]. Because she left office in October 2025 rather than continuing to the 28 July 2026 date §15.2 analyses, her Article 117 sitting-President immunity ceased at that earlier date rather than at the later one; [TBD-VERIFY: the specific procedural status of the Caso Rolex, Caso Cofopri, and related matters as of August 2026 was not independently confirmed in this research pass and is a priority item for the next recency sweep]. This section supersedes §15.1–15.2's forward-looking treatment of the question on the point of when her term ended and how the succession proceeded; §15.3's open questions on the post-presidency prosecutorial trajectory remain open, now measured from October 2025 rather than July 2026.

---

End of document. Word count target: ~10,000 words. Status: [TBD-VERIFY-PENDING]. Version: 2026-08-30. Cross-reference audit: PE-H-PRES-01..06 (predecessor biographies), PE-A-01..04 (Fujimori-García period anchors), PE-B-01 (Humala anchor), PE-D-01..08 (Castillo–Boluarte–2026 period), PE-G-01 (Mining anchor), PE-J-03–04 (Contested-legacies anchors), PE-K-01..02 (Key-decision anchors), PE-R-01 (Books canon). Forward-research stubs: comprehensive Caso Rolex carpeta fiscal findings; Los Waykis formal-accusation timing; Inter-American Court case-flow on Juliaca, Ayacucho, Santisteban; the post-10-October-2025 prosecutorial-immunity-lifting sequence; eventual book-length biographical source on Boluarte (none yet published as of the 2026-08-29 update).